Re: [Internal-cg] Larry's comments at GAC
Joe It should be addressed in section IV bullet point 5 from our RFP. Therefore the assessments should apply due diligence there also. Narelle -- Narelle Clark Director of Operations - Deputy CEO Australian Communications Consumer Action Network Suite 402 Level 4, 55 Mountain St Ultimo NSW 2007 Ph: 02 9288 4000 Direct: 02 9288 4007 Fax: 02 9288 4019 TTY: 02 9281 5322 joseph alhadeff <joseph.alhadeff@oracle.com> wrote: Two statements of interest: 1. Don't even bother me with a partial proposal... 2. He pushed the names community to provide information on how long it would take them to implement the proposal? Is that something we should add more specifically to our questions? I don't think we've explored that dimension too much? Joe _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
I think this sounds like a confirmation of our discussion on time line and the issue of incremental work of the ICG regarding the 2 submitted proposals from Numbers and Protocol Parameters. I think we did conclude that there would be no submission of a partial proposal. I agree we add to the questions. Mary Uduma On Sunday, February 8, 2015 11:14 AM, Narelle Clark <narelle.clark@accan.org.au> wrote: Joe It should be addressed in section IV bullet point 5 from our RFP. Therefore the assessments should apply due diligence there also. Narelle -- Narelle Clark Director of Operations - Deputy CEO Australian Communications Consumer Action Network Suite 402 Level 4, 55 Mountain St Ultimo NSW 2007 Ph: 02 9288 4000 Direct: 02 9288 4007 Fax: 02 9288 4019 TTY: 02 9281 5322 joseph alhadeff <joseph.alhadeff@oracle.com> wrote: Two statements of interest: 1. Don't even bother me with a partial proposal... 2. He pushed the names community to provide information on how long it would take them to implement the proposal? Is that something we should add more specifically to our questions? I don't think we've explored that dimension too much? Joe _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
On 8.02.15 11:09 , Narelle Clark wrote:
Joe It should be addressed in section IV bullet point 5 from our RFP.
Therefore the assessments should apply due diligence there also.
Narelle is right. Our RFP asks the question and the proposals received so far are clear enough for me. No worries Joe. ;-) Daniel Also: This is just another way for Larry to ask the names: "Ain't that a little too complicated?" Which I read to mean: "Do you really think this can happen during our administration?" In case it is not clear to all of us: A lot of those complicating the names process may very well do so with the hope to delay enough until the administration changes in the vain hope that this process will be stopped then. This is also the reason why I expect the other OCs not to have endless patience. Daniel
Daniel Yes not endless-patience but enough time to do it properly. Some of us are in hurry to make " vite fait , male faut" but not all if us. Tks kavouss Sent from my iPhone
On 8 Feb 2015, at 16:08, Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net> wrote:
On 8.02.15 11:09 , Narelle Clark wrote:
Joe It should be addressed in section IV bullet point 5 from our RFP.
Therefore the assessments should apply due diligence there also.
Narelle is right. Our RFP asks the question and the proposals received so far are clear enough for me. No worries Joe. ;-)
Daniel
Also: This is just another way for Larry to ask the names: "Ain't that a little too complicated?" Which I read to mean: "Do you really think this can happen during our administration?"
In case it is not clear to all of us: A lot of those complicating the names process may very well do so with the hope to delay enough until the administration changes in the vain hope that this process will be stopped then.
This is also the reason why I expect the other OCs not to have endless patience.
Daniel
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
participants (4)
-
Daniel Karrenberg -
Kavouss Arasteh -
Mary Uduma -
Narelle Clark