I think this sounds like a confirmation of our discussion on time line and the issue of incremental work of the ICG regarding the 2 submitted proposals from Numbers and Protocol Parameters. I think we did conclude that there would be no submission of a partial proposal. I agree we add to the questions. Mary Uduma On Sunday, February 8, 2015 11:14 AM, Narelle Clark <narelle.clark@accan.org.au> wrote: Joe It should be addressed in section IV bullet point 5 from our RFP. Therefore the assessments should apply due diligence there also. Narelle -- Narelle Clark Director of Operations - Deputy CEO Australian Communications Consumer Action Network Suite 402 Level 4, 55 Mountain St Ultimo NSW 2007 Ph: 02 9288 4000 Direct: 02 9288 4007 Fax: 02 9288 4019 TTY: 02 9281 5322 joseph alhadeff <joseph.alhadeff@oracle.com> wrote: Two statements of interest: 1. Don't even bother me with a partial proposal... 2. He pushed the names community to provide information on how long it would take them to implement the proposal? Is that something we should add more specifically to our questions? I don't think we've explored that dimension too much? Joe _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg