Let's discuss that on Friday. I would be surprised if we did not hear more from the numbers community and/or CRISP already before our comment deadline for the meeting. Daniel --- Sent from a handheld device.

On 04.02.2015, at 02:22, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:

Thanks to you both for your assessments of the CRISP proposal.

I read the assessments and the proposal itself and find it to be a strong contribution. I agree with the assessment’s conclusion that it meets all of the RFP requirements.

From my personal perspective as someone who followed the CRISP process via the mailing list, it’s not clear to me that the two community comments received require further follow-up. Richard Hill’s comments (and Guru Acharya’s point #4) re-raise substantive issues that were discussed during the development of the proposal and did not achieve consensus. I do not see a need for the ICG to engage with the numbering community on those issues since they have already been discussed and decided within the operational community process.

Guru Acharya’s characterization of the CRISP process and its exclusivity is quite different from my understanding of it. However, if others on the ICG believe the characterization has merit, we may want to ask for the CRISP group to provide a response.

Alissa

...

On Jan 27, 2015, at 1:43 PM, WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de> wrote:

Hi Paul (and all),

thanks for doing it first. It makes it easier for me since I took your assessment and inserted my amendments in red. Since I was never directly involved in any activities of the Numbering Community you may accept my view from a different perspective.

I attach a redline as well as a clean version of the assessment and look forward to a good discussion tomorrow.

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- From: Paul Wilson Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 3:23 AM To: ICG Subject: [Internal-cg] CRISP proposal assessment

Dear all,

Here attached is my assessment of the CRISP proposal.

All the best

Paul.

________________________________________________________________________ Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC <dg@apnic.net> http://www.apnic.net +61 7 3858 3100

_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg <numbers-proposal-assessment-WUK_redline.doc><numbers-proposal-assessment-WUK_clean.doc>_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg

_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg

WU, Paul, et al: I have reviewed the CRISP proposal and the ‘clean’ version of the assessment and I am in complete agreement with the assessment. Thanks, Jari