Dear Colleagues, within the next 2 days I hope to send you a constructive proposal, on behalf of the ALAC. Best regards, Jean-Jacques.
Dear Colleagues, as announced yesterday, I am now forwarding a proposal that the ALAC has developed for the Chair structure of our group. As you remember, in London the ALAC representatives were among the first to support the enlargement of the GAC contingent from 2 to 5, while ensuring that the ALAC, as a token of its commitment to keep the size of our group close to what it was, would not seek a similar privilege for itself. The ALAC's call for implementing the decision taken in London (3 Co-Chairs) was based on stated principles: diversity, adequate representation, fairness. While maintaining these principles, the ALAC is keen to help our process along by proposing a new structure, incorporating these principles as well as some elements discussed online since the London meeting. Here is the ALAC proposal: - Chair + 4 Vice-Chairs, these 5 being from the 5 different regions (as per ICANN practice). - No region or citizenship may occupy more than one of these positions. There shall be no automatic entitlement of any region to the position of Chair. - Process: - Interim Chair is requested to launch a call for candidates for the 5 positions on the leadership team. It is suggested that these should reach Interim Chair by Monday 11 August at 23:59 UTC. - Interim Chair would then publish the list of candidates, each with her/his relevant data (full name, business or other affiliation, organization represented, region, citizenship), and set a date for the vote. - The result of the vote to be published immediately, and the new leadership to convene as soon as possible. In order to ensure adequate representation of the global Internet user community, Jean-Jacques Subrenat (European region, citizen of France) has decided to withdraw his candidacy for the position of Co-Chair, and is nominating Mohamed El-Bashir (African region, citizen of Sudan) for Vice-Chair. Mohamed has accepted to be nominated, and his candidacy is endorsed by the ALAC. Best regards, Jean-Jacques.
Dear All, I wholeheartedly support the proposals which was first raised by me having chair plus 4 vice chairs from 4 ICANN geographical régions ( even though there is no balanced devision of the world into 5 ICANN régions ).I fully agree with the criteria mentioned above Regards K.ARASTEH 2014-08-07 10:01 GMT+02:00 Subrenat, Jean-Jacques <jjs@dyalog.net>:
Dear Colleagues,
as announced yesterday, I am now forwarding a proposal that the ALAC has developed for the Chair structure of our group.
As you remember, in London the ALAC representatives were among the first to support the enlargement of the GAC contingent from 2 to 5, while ensuring that the ALAC, as a token of its commitment to keep the size of our group close to what it was, would not seek a similar privilege for itself.
The ALAC's call for implementing the decision taken in London (3 Co-Chairs) was based on stated principles: diversity, adequate representation, fairness. While maintaining these principles, the ALAC is keen to help our process along by proposing a new structure, incorporating these principles as well as some elements discussed online since the London meeting.
Here is the ALAC proposal:
- Chair + 4 Vice-Chairs, these 5 being from the 5 different regions (as per ICANN practice).
- No region or citizenship may occupy more than one of these positions. There shall be no automatic entitlement of any region to the position of Chair.
- Process: - Interim Chair is requested to launch a call for candidates for the 5 positions on the leadership team. It is suggested that these should reach Interim Chair by Monday 11 August at 23:59 UTC. - Interim Chair would then publish the list of candidates, each with her/his relevant data (full name, business or other affiliation, organization represented, region, citizenship), and set a date for the vote. - The result of the vote to be published immediately, and the new leadership to convene as soon as possible.
In order to ensure adequate representation of the global Internet user community, Jean-Jacques Subrenat (European region, citizen of France) has decided to withdraw his candidacy for the position of Co-Chair, and is nominating Mohamed El-Bashir (African region, citizen of Sudan) for Vice-Chair. Mohamed has accepted to be nominated, and his candidacy is endorsed by the ALAC.
Best regards, Jean-Jacques. _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
Dear Jean-Jacques and colleagues, I must say I'm surprised by this ALAC proposal because it seems to me not consistent with what we have heard so far from ALAC and have found most agreement to after vivid discussion on the list - namely the 3 (co-)chair model. I'm asking myself why this shouldn't lead other member groups thinking about earlier models already discussed or new ones. In addition the process may have to be detailed with respect to the voting scheme.
From my point of view I can say that the 3 chair model (as well as 1 or 2) is backed by the CSG I'm representing. Re the ALAC proposal I'd like to refer back to them. As a constituency call has been already scheduled for Monday 11 Aug I could only come back after this call. I'd like the ICG taking this into consideration when scheduling the process.
In between I understand the call for (co-,vice-) chair positions is already open independent from the number of positions. In this regard I welcom Mohamed's nomination. Maybe Alissa could update us on the candidacies so fare received. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- From: Subrenat, Jean-Jacques Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2014 10:01 AM To: ICG Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Chair structure. Dear Colleagues, as announced yesterday, I am now forwarding a proposal that the ALAC has developed for the Chair structure of our group. As you remember, in London the ALAC representatives were among the first to support the enlargement of the GAC contingent from 2 to 5, while ensuring that the ALAC, as a token of its commitment to keep the size of our group close to what it was, would not seek a similar privilege for itself. The ALAC's call for implementing the decision taken in London (3 Co-Chairs) was based on stated principles: diversity, adequate representation, fairness. While maintaining these principles, the ALAC is keen to help our process along by proposing a new structure, incorporating these principles as well as some elements discussed online since the London meeting. Here is the ALAC proposal: - Chair + 4 Vice-Chairs, these 5 being from the 5 different regions (as per ICANN practice). - No region or citizenship may occupy more than one of these positions. There shall be no automatic entitlement of any region to the position of Chair. - Process: - Interim Chair is requested to launch a call for candidates for the 5 positions on the leadership team. It is suggested that these should reach Interim Chair by Monday 11 August at 23:59 UTC. - Interim Chair would then publish the list of candidates, each with her/his relevant data (full name, business or other affiliation, organization represented, region, citizenship), and set a date for the vote. - The result of the vote to be published immediately, and the new leadership to convene as soon as possible. In order to ensure adequate representation of the global Internet user community, Jean-Jacques Subrenat (European region, citizen of France) has decided to withdraw his candidacy for the position of Co-Chair, and is nominating Mohamed El-Bashir (African region, citizen of Sudan) for Vice-Chair. Mohamed has accepted to be nominated, and his candidacy is endorsed by the ALAC. Best regards, Jean-Jacques. _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
I agree with Wolf. I can't help but think that this proposal, and more importantly the level of priority that is being given to the structure of chairs, is based on the false premise that the ICG is the basic drafter or developer of the IANA transition proposals. It is not. If you want proper representative of regional variations or "citizenships" in this transition, you'd better focus on getting people from those regions and "citizenships" involved in proposal development.** I also detect a certain tendency here to develop positions on ICG issues among our own silos rather than seeking consensus and ideas among the ICG members themselves. Both tendencies are counterproductive IMHO. --MM ** Once you do that, you will probably learn that the correlation between region, citizenship and specific positions re IANA proposals is a random one, too.
-----Original Message----- I must say I'm surprised by this ALAC proposal because it seems to me not consistent with what we have heard so far from ALAC and have found most agreement to after vivid discussion on the list - namely the 3 (co-)chair model. I'm asking myself why this shouldn't lead other member groups thinking about earlier models already discussed or new ones.
In addition the process may have to be detailed with respect to the voting scheme.
From my point of view I can say that the 3 chair model (as well as 1 or 2) is backed by the CSG I'm representing. Re the ALAC proposal I'd like to refer back to them. As a constituency call has been already scheduled for Monday 11 Aug I could only come back after this call. I'd like the ICG taking this into consideration when scheduling the process.
In between I understand the call for (co-,vice-) chair positions is already open independent from the number of positions. In this regard I welcom Mohamed's nomination. Maybe Alissa could update us on the candidacies so fare received.
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
I understand the desire for transparency and inclusion but it seems that we are turning this function upside down into a bureaucratic impediment that is purely form over substance. There was clearly a desire to avoid needless layers and complexity in our operation. This new proposal further underscores that we have not found a mechanism to get to consensus and maybe this should be our first action. There had been some movement towards considering methods of consensus, are we still on track for that? Joe Sent from my iPad
On Aug 7, 2014, at 11:00 AM, Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu> wrote:
I agree with Wolf. I can't help but think that this proposal, and more importantly the level of priority that is being given to the structure of chairs, is based on the false premise that the ICG is the basic drafter or developer of the IANA transition proposals. It is not. If you want proper representative of regional variations or "citizenships" in this transition, you'd better focus on getting people from those regions and "citizenships" involved in proposal development.** I also detect a certain tendency here to develop positions on ICG issues among our own silos rather than seeking consensus and ideas among the ICG members themselves. Both tendencies are counterproductive IMHO.
--MM
** Once you do that, you will probably learn that the correlation between region, citizenship and specific positions re IANA proposals is a random one, too.
-----Original Message----- I must say I'm surprised by this ALAC proposal because it seems to me not consistent with what we have heard so far from ALAC and have found most agreement to after vivid discussion on the list - namely the 3 (co-)chair model. I'm asking myself why this shouldn't lead other member groups thinking about earlier models already discussed or new ones.
In addition the process may have to be detailed with respect to the voting scheme.
From my point of view I can say that the 3 chair model (as well as 1 or 2) is backed by the CSG I'm representing. Re the ALAC proposal I'd like to refer back to them. As a constituency call has been already scheduled for Monday 11 Aug I could only come back after this call. I'd like the ICG taking this into consideration when scheduling the process.
In between I understand the call for (co-,vice-) chair positions is already open independent from the number of positions. In this regard I welcom Mohamed's nomination. Maybe Alissa could update us on the candidacies so fare received.
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
Fully agree with Milton here. The *real* work will be done by the various communities in a bottom-up, consensus manner. The function of the ICG is to coordinate and facilitate. The role of the ICG chair(s) is coordinate the logistics of the ICG, not influence the substance of the recommendation. It's an administrative function that requires hard work and the ability to keep our trains running on time. Keith -----Original Message----- From: internal-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Milton L Mueller Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2014 11:01 AM To: ICG Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Chair structure. I agree with Wolf. I can't help but think that this proposal, and more importantly the level of priority that is being given to the structure of chairs, is based on the false premise that the ICG is the basic drafter or developer of the IANA transition proposals. It is not. If you want proper representative of regional variations or "citizenships" in this transition, you'd better focus on getting people from those regions and "citizenships" involved in proposal development.** I also detect a certain tendency here to develop positions on ICG issues among our own silos rather than seeking consensus and ideas among the ICG members themselves. Both tendencies are counterproductive IMHO. --MM ** Once you do that, you will probably learn that the correlation between region, citizenship and specific positions re IANA proposals is a random one, too.
-----Original Message----- I must say I'm surprised by this ALAC proposal because it seems to me not consistent with what we have heard so far from ALAC and have found most agreement to after vivid discussion on the list - namely the 3 (co-)chair model. I'm asking myself why this shouldn't lead other member groups thinking about earlier models already discussed or new ones.
In addition the process may have to be detailed with respect to the voting scheme.
From my point of view I can say that the 3 chair model (as well as 1 or 2) is backed by the CSG I'm representing. Re the ALAC proposal I'd like to refer back to them. As a constituency call has been already scheduled for Monday 11 Aug I could only come back after this call. I'd like the ICG taking this into consideration when scheduling the process.
In between I understand the call for (co-,vice-) chair positions is already open independent from the number of positions. In this regard I welcom Mohamed's nomination. Maybe Alissa could update us on the candidacies so fare received.
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
Dear Colleagues Please do not be emotional nor surprised We need to do the job properly I agree with Milton that ICG is not the basic drafter or developer of the IANA transition proposals.. However, we really want the proper representation of regional variations or "citizenships" in the process transition .I do not know how one could judge that we are not focusing on getting people from various regions and "citizenships" involved in proposal development.. We are committed to do so. We need to properly address who should be in the leadership of the Group and how different people should react in full neutrality and impartiality . I do not understand why some people are so sensitive about the formal disclosure of their nationality and affiliation. We need to avoid any individual influences the process We need to avoid that any one member of ICG dominate the process I do not see any tendency here to develop positions on ICG issues among ourselves Certainly we are looking toward to build consensus but when we hear an adjective like soft and hard or rough before consensus we ask ourselves that we have already following certain avenue or proposing certain approach not commonly recognized by multistake community such rough consensus in which the chair is given the authority to judge when he or she would stop further action to build full consensus. I also do not see very useful to have three persons as called co-chairs What is the problem of regional representation *having* one chair and four vice chairs representing four ICANN geographic regions, except the region from which the chair comes from? I am also not comfortable to decide something in a definitive manner before the full ICG meets in Istanbul One chair and four vice chairs forming a team “management Team “is an approach that has worked well without any major deficiency Let us work with each other .Let us understand each other and pursue one single objective that is an open ,transparent, unbiased, democratic, process Regards K.A 2014-08-07 17:00 GMT+02:00 Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>: > I agree with Wolf. I can't help but think that this proposal, and more > importantly the level of priority that is being given to the structure of > chairs, is based on the false premise that the ICG is the basic drafter or > developer of the IANA transition proposals. It is not. If you want proper > representative of regional variations or "citizenships" in this transition, > you'd better focus on getting people from those regions and "citizenships" > involved in proposal development.** I also detect a certain tendency here > to develop positions on ICG issues among our own silos rather than seeking > consensus and ideas among the ICG members themselves. Both tendencies are > counterproductive IMHO. > > --MM > > ** Once you do that, you will probably learn that the correlation between > region, citizenship and specific positions re IANA proposals is a random > one, too. > > > -----Original Message----- > > I must say I'm surprised by this ALAC proposal because it seems to me not > > consistent with what we have heard so far from ALAC and have found most > > agreement to after vivid discussion on the list - namely the 3 (co-)chair > > model. > > I'm asking myself why this shouldn't lead other member groups thinking > > about earlier models already discussed or new ones. > > > > In addition the process may have to be detailed with respect to the > voting > > scheme. > > > > From my point of view I can say that the 3 chair model (as well as 1 or > 2) is > > backed by the CSG I'm representing. Re the ALAC proposal I'd like to > refer > > back to them. As a constituency call has been already scheduled for > Monday > > 11 Aug I could only come back after this call. I'd like the ICG taking > this into > > consideration when scheduling the process. > > > > In between I understand the call for (co-,vice-) chair positions is > already open > > independent from the number of positions. In this regard I welcom > > Mohamed's nomination. Maybe Alissa could update us on the candidacies so > > fare received. > > > > Best regards > > > > Wolf-Ulrich > > > > _______________________________________________ > Internal-cg mailing list > Internal-cg@icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg >
What is the problem of regional representation having one chair and four vice chairs representing four ICANN geographic regions, except the region from which the chair comes from?
From my perspective, having 3 people serve in ICG leadership positions is already 10% of our membership. That is high. These leaders will need to work together, and making that group even bigger will make coordination among them too complex. Let's go with the 1+2 proposal. We already have the opportunity for geographic diversity among those three leadership positions -- each of them coming from different continent. We need to get a request for proposals out to the communities. I'd like to put this structure discussion behind us and get to the work that our communities selected us to do. Russ
To be honest, I do not understand the logic behind this proposal in terms of either substance or process. I will not oppose the proposal, but I am sure we would have a better chance of convergence/compromise with an addition of diversity requirements to the existing 1+2 configuration. Paul. On 7 Aug 2014, at 6:01 pm, Subrenat, Jean-Jacques <jjs@dyalog.net> wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
as announced yesterday, I am now forwarding a proposal that the ALAC has developed for the Chair structure of our group.
As you remember, in London the ALAC representatives were among the first to support the enlargement of the GAC contingent from 2 to 5, while ensuring that the ALAC, as a token of its commitment to keep the size of our group close to what it was, would not seek a similar privilege for itself.
The ALAC's call for implementing the decision taken in London (3 Co-Chairs) was based on stated principles: diversity, adequate representation, fairness. While maintaining these principles, the ALAC is keen to help our process along by proposing a new structure, incorporating these principles as well as some elements discussed online since the London meeting.
Here is the ALAC proposal:
- Chair + 4 Vice-Chairs, these 5 being from the 5 different regions (as per ICANN practice).
- No region or citizenship may occupy more than one of these positions. There shall be no automatic entitlement of any region to the position of Chair.
- Process: - Interim Chair is requested to launch a call for candidates for the 5 positions on the leadership team. It is suggested that these should reach Interim Chair by Monday 11 August at 23:59 UTC. - Interim Chair would then publish the list of candidates, each with her/his relevant data (full name, business or other affiliation, organization represented, region, citizenship), and set a date for the vote. - The result of the vote to be published immediately, and the new leadership to convene as soon as possible.
In order to ensure adequate representation of the global Internet user community, Jean-Jacques Subrenat (European region, citizen of France) has decided to withdraw his candidacy for the position of Co-Chair, and is nominating Mohamed El-Bashir (African region, citizen of Sudan) for Vice-Chair. Mohamed has accepted to be nominated, and his candidacy is endorsed by the ALAC.
Best regards, Jean-Jacques. _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
I'm not sure but I don't think we had volunteers to date from more than 2 continents... Also should we consider the persons nationality or the locus of the organization they represent? Sent from my iPad
On Aug 7, 2014, at 7:49 PM, Paul Wilson <pwilson@apnic.net> wrote:
To be honest, I do not understand the logic behind this proposal in terms of either substance or process.
I will not oppose the proposal, but I am sure we would have a better chance of convergence/compromise with an addition of diversity requirements to the existing 1+2 configuration.
Paul.
On 7 Aug 2014, at 6:01 pm, Subrenat, Jean-Jacques <jjs@dyalog.net> wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
as announced yesterday, I am now forwarding a proposal that the ALAC has developed for the Chair structure of our group.
As you remember, in London the ALAC representatives were among the first to support the enlargement of the GAC contingent from 2 to 5, while ensuring that the ALAC, as a token of its commitment to keep the size of our group close to what it was, would not seek a similar privilege for itself.
The ALAC's call for implementing the decision taken in London (3 Co-Chairs) was based on stated principles: diversity, adequate representation, fairness. While maintaining these principles, the ALAC is keen to help our process along by proposing a new structure, incorporating these principles as well as some elements discussed online since the London meeting.
Here is the ALAC proposal:
- Chair + 4 Vice-Chairs, these 5 being from the 5 different regions (as per ICANN practice).
- No region or citizenship may occupy more than one of these positions. There shall be no automatic entitlement of any region to the position of Chair.
- Process: - Interim Chair is requested to launch a call for candidates for the 5 positions on the leadership team. It is suggested that these should reach Interim Chair by Monday 11 August at 23:59 UTC. - Interim Chair would then publish the list of candidates, each with her/his relevant data (full name, business or other affiliation, organization represented, region, citizenship), and set a date for the vote. - The result of the vote to be published immediately, and the new leadership to convene as soon as possible.
In order to ensure adequate representation of the global Internet user community, Jean-Jacques Subrenat (European region, citizen of France) has decided to withdraw his candidacy for the position of Co-Chair, and is nominating Mohamed El-Bashir (African region, citizen of Sudan) for Vice-Chair. Mohamed has accepted to be nominated, and his candidacy is endorsed by the ALAC.
Best regards, Jean-Jacques. _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
Two quick points: - Nationality or citizenship: as a compromise proposal, I could accept to have a column in the table, but making it optional for each member to fill it out. Jean-Jacques. ----- Mail original ----- De: "Joseph Alhadeff" <joseph.alhadeff@oracle.com> À: "Paul Wilson" <pwilson@apnic.net> Cc: "Jean-Jacques Subrenat" <jjs@dyalog.net>, "ICG" <internal-cg@icann.org> Envoyé: Vendredi 8 Août 2014 02:46:01 Objet: Re: [Internal-cg] Chair structure. I'm not sure but I don't think we had volunteers to date from more than 2 continents... Also should we consider the persons nationality or the locus of the organization they represent? Sent from my iPad
On Aug 7, 2014, at 7:49 PM, Paul Wilson <pwilson@apnic.net> wrote:
To be honest, I do not understand the logic behind this proposal in terms of either substance or process.
I will not oppose the proposal, but I am sure we would have a better chance of convergence/compromise with an addition of diversity requirements to the existing 1+2 configuration.
Paul.
On 7 Aug 2014, at 6:01 pm, Subrenat, Jean-Jacques <jjs@dyalog.net> wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
as announced yesterday, I am now forwarding a proposal that the ALAC has developed for the Chair structure of our group.
As you remember, in London the ALAC representatives were among the first to support the enlargement of the GAC contingent from 2 to 5, while ensuring that the ALAC, as a token of its commitment to keep the size of our group close to what it was, would not seek a similar privilege for itself.
The ALAC's call for implementing the decision taken in London (3 Co-Chairs) was based on stated principles: diversity, adequate representation, fairness. While maintaining these principles, the ALAC is keen to help our process along by proposing a new structure, incorporating these principles as well as some elements discussed online since the London meeting.
Here is the ALAC proposal:
- Chair + 4 Vice-Chairs, these 5 being from the 5 different regions (as per ICANN practice).
- No region or citizenship may occupy more than one of these positions. There shall be no automatic entitlement of any region to the position of Chair.
- Process: - Interim Chair is requested to launch a call for candidates for the 5 positions on the leadership team. It is suggested that these should reach Interim Chair by Monday 11 August at 23:59 UTC. - Interim Chair would then publish the list of candidates, each with her/his relevant data (full name, business or other affiliation, organization represented, region, citizenship), and set a date for the vote. - The result of the vote to be published immediately, and the new leadership to convene as soon as possible.
In order to ensure adequate representation of the global Internet user community, Jean-Jacques Subrenat (European region, citizen of France) has decided to withdraw his candidacy for the position of Co-Chair, and is nominating Mohamed El-Bashir (African region, citizen of Sudan) for Vice-Chair. Mohamed has accepted to be nominated, and his candidacy is endorsed by the ALAC.
Best regards, Jean-Jacques. _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
+1 If we accept 5 members from GAC to have better regional representation, I support the same arguments for the 1 chair + 4 vice-chairs proposal from ALAC . best Hartmut ======================================== On 07/08/14 05:01, Subrenat, Jean-Jacques wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
as announced yesterday, I am now forwarding a proposal that the ALAC has developed for the Chair structure of our group.
As you remember, in London the ALAC representatives were among the first to support the enlargement of the GAC contingent from 2 to 5, while ensuring that the ALAC, as a token of its commitment to keep the size of our group close to what it was, would not seek a similar privilege for itself.
The ALAC's call for implementing the decision taken in London (3 Co-Chairs) was based on stated principles: diversity, adequate representation, fairness. While maintaining these principles, the ALAC is keen to help our process along by proposing a new structure, incorporating these principles as well as some elements discussed online since the London meeting.
Here is the ALAC proposal:
- Chair + 4 Vice-Chairs, these 5 being from the 5 different regions (as per ICANN practice).
- No region or citizenship may occupy more than one of these positions. There shall be no automatic entitlement of any region to the position of Chair.
- Process: - Interim Chair is requested to launch a call for candidates for the 5 positions on the leadership team. It is suggested that these should reach Interim Chair by Monday 11 August at 23:59 UTC. - Interim Chair would then publish the list of candidates, each with her/his relevant data (full name, business or other affiliation, organization represented, region, citizenship), and set a date for the vote. - The result of the vote to be published immediately, and the new leadership to convene as soon as possible.
In order to ensure adequate representation of the global Internet user community, Jean-Jacques Subrenat (European region, citizen of France) has decided to withdraw his candidacy for the position of Co-Chair, and is nominating Mohamed El-Bashir (African region, citizen of Sudan) for Vice-Chair. Mohamed has accepted to be nominated, and his candidacy is endorsed by the ALAC.
Best regards, Jean-Jacques. _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
participants (9)
-
Drazek, Keith -
Hartmut Richard Glaser -
Joseph Alhadeff -
Kavouss Arasteh -
Milton L Mueller -
Paul Wilson -
Russ Housley -
Subrenat, Jean-Jacques -
WUKnoben