Dear Matthew, All, ICANN has started to review the yellow items in the NTIA report and is working on a plan to address them. We will share with the community our thoughts and proposals on how these items can be addressed. As per the work plan, the PTI Conflict of Interest policy is supposed to be circulated today. We will hold off circulating it until we determine and make any changes necessary to it to address any of the yellow items from the NTIA report. We currently don¹t anticipate that this will take long and should not impact the overall timeline of the work plan. There is room in the timeline to shift things out for the Conflict of Interest policy and still allow us to meet the public comment start date for the entire PTI formation documents package. Best, Trang -----Original Message----- From: <iotf-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Matthew Shears <mshears@cdt.org> Date: Friday, June 10, 2016 at 4:14 AM To: "iotf@icann.org" <iotf@icann.org> Subject: [IOTF] COSO review and our work
Hi all
I may have missed it and apologies but I assume that we will be reviewing the COSO findings in the report as a number of the "yellow" rated items and recommendations from NTIA apply to PTI implementation/planning work. Also, given that these may well be picked up on by those who are less enthusiastic about the transition we should probably review and address each of them as a priority?
Thanks.
Matthew
https://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/publications/attachment_5_coso_assessm ent_chart.pdf
--
Matthew Shears | Director, Global Internet Policy & Human Rights Project Center for Democracy & Technology | cdt.org E: mshears@cdt.org | T: +44.771.247.2987
_______________________________________________ IOTF mailing list IOTF@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/iotf