I was thinking that it’s probably around the time that ICANN staff are starting to put together the agenda for ICANN 56 (although you all would know better than me, since the ICG is not meeting). I think given the timing of ICANN 56 it will be important to have a session where an implementation update can be provided by this group, including both the community reps and the ICANN staff, and the community can have an opportunity to comment and ask questions. Wanted to flag that idea in case agenda requests are already going in. I will not be in Helsinki but will follow remotely. Alissa
Hi All, Any follow-up on Alissa's request below? James Gannon IGM Manager – Projects & IT Security SME -----Original Message----- From: iotf-bounces@icann.org [mailto:iotf-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Alissa Cooper Sent: 28 April 2016 23:30 To: Alissa Cooper via Iotf Subject: [IOTF] ICANN 56 scheduling I was thinking that it’s probably around the time that ICANN staff are starting to put together the agenda for ICANN 56 (although you all would know better than me, since the ICG is not meeting). I think given the timing of ICANN 56 it will be important to have a session where an implementation update can be provided by this group, including both the community reps and the ICANN staff, and the community can have an opportunity to comment and ask questions. Wanted to flag that idea in case agenda requests are already going in. I will not be in Helsinki but will follow remotely. Alissa _______________________________________________ IOTF mailing list IOTF@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/iotf
All, Apologies for the delay in responding to this. We had to do a bit of checking internally regarding the process to request sessions for the new meeting B format. There are no issues with holding a transition implementation planning update session at ICANN56. From a process perspective, the request would just need to go through an SO or AC because all sessions at ICANN56 are scheduled by SOs and ACs. Many of you participate in an ICANN SO or AC so perhaps someone from the group could volunteer to propose this through an SO or AC? My team and I would be more than happy to help with any of the logistics. We just can¹t request the session because of the new meeting B format. Thank you, Trang -----Original Message----- From: <iotf-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of "Gannon, James-1" <james-1.gannon@novartis.com> Date: Tuesday, May 3, 2016 at 8:05 AM To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Alissa Cooper via Iotf <iotf@icann.org> Subject: Re: [IOTF] ICANN 56 scheduling
Hi All, Any follow-up on Alissa's request below?
James Gannon IGM Manager Projects & IT Security SME
-----Original Message----- From: iotf-bounces@icann.org [mailto:iotf-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Alissa Cooper Sent: 28 April 2016 23:30 To: Alissa Cooper via Iotf Subject: [IOTF] ICANN 56 scheduling
I was thinking that it¹s probably around the time that ICANN staff are starting to put together the agenda for ICANN 56 (although you all would know better than me, since the ICG is not meeting). I think given the timing of ICANN 56 it will be important to have a session where an implementation update can be provided by this group, including both the community reps and the ICANN staff, and the community can have an opportunity to comment and ask questions. Wanted to flag that idea in case agenda requests are already going in. I will not be in Helsinki but will follow remotely.
Alissa _______________________________________________ IOTF mailing list IOTF@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/iotf _______________________________________________ IOTF mailing list IOTF@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/iotf
Trang, My understanding is that the community meetings team is getting close to finalizing the Helsinki schedule so it would be good to nail this down as soon as possible. I know that one of the things they are trying to do is to minimize conflicts so it would seem to me that getting them involved as soon as possible is important. I cc'd Donna Austin because she has been representing the GNSO on the meetings team. Hopefully she can at least inform the team of the need and maybe even make some suggestions. How much time is needed? Any more than an hour? Have you considered doing it over a lunch break? Chuck -----Original Message----- From: iotf-bounces@icann.org [mailto:iotf-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Trang Nguyen Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 3:21 PM To: Gannon, James-1; Alissa Cooper; Alissa Cooper via Iotf Cc: Hillary Jett Subject: Re: [IOTF] ICANN 56 scheduling All, Apologies for the delay in responding to this. We had to do a bit of checking internally regarding the process to request sessions for the new meeting B format. There are no issues with holding a transition implementation planning update session at ICANN56. From a process perspective, the request would just need to go through an SO or AC because all sessions at ICANN56 are scheduled by SOs and ACs. Many of you participate in an ICANN SO or AC so perhaps someone from the group could volunteer to propose this through an SO or AC? My team and I would be more than happy to help with any of the logistics. We just can¹t request the session because of the new meeting B format. Thank you, Trang -----Original Message----- From: <iotf-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of "Gannon, James-1" <james-1.gannon@novartis.com> Date: Tuesday, May 3, 2016 at 8:05 AM To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Alissa Cooper via Iotf <iotf@icann.org> Subject: Re: [IOTF] ICANN 56 scheduling
Hi All, Any follow-up on Alissa's request below?
James Gannon IGM Manager Projects & IT Security SME
-----Original Message----- From: iotf-bounces@icann.org [mailto:iotf-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Alissa Cooper Sent: 28 April 2016 23:30 To: Alissa Cooper via Iotf Subject: [IOTF] ICANN 56 scheduling
I was thinking that it¹s probably around the time that ICANN staff are starting to put together the agenda for ICANN 56 (although you all would know better than me, since the ICG is not meeting). I think given the timing of ICANN 56 it will be important to have a session where an implementation update can be provided by this group, including both the community reps and the ICANN staff, and the community can have an opportunity to comment and ask questions. Wanted to flag that idea in case agenda requests are already going in. I will not be in Helsinki but will follow remotely.
Alissa _______________________________________________ IOTF mailing list IOTF@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/iotf _______________________________________________ IOTF mailing list IOTF@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/iotf
_______________________________________________ IOTF mailing list IOTF@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/iotf
Agree that it would be useful to have a meeting in Helsinki. On 5/6/2016 10:18 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
Trang,
My understanding is that the community meetings team is getting close to finalizing the Helsinki schedule so it would be good to nail this down as soon as possible. I know that one of the things they are trying to do is to minimize conflicts so it would seem to me that getting them involved as soon as possible is important. I cc'd Donna Austin because she has been representing the GNSO on the meetings team. Hopefully she can at least inform the team of the need and maybe even make some suggestions. How much time is needed? Any more than an hour? Have you considered doing it over a lunch break?
Chuck
-----Original Message----- From: iotf-bounces@icann.org [mailto:iotf-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Trang Nguyen Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 3:21 PM To: Gannon, James-1; Alissa Cooper; Alissa Cooper via Iotf Cc: Hillary Jett Subject: Re: [IOTF] ICANN 56 scheduling
All,
Apologies for the delay in responding to this. We had to do a bit of checking internally regarding the process to request sessions for the new meeting B format.
There are no issues with holding a transition implementation planning update session at ICANN56. From a process perspective, the request would just need to go through an SO or AC because all sessions at ICANN56 are scheduled by SOs and ACs. Many of you participate in an ICANN SO or AC so perhaps someone from the group could volunteer to propose this through an SO or AC? My team and I would be more than happy to help with any of the logistics. We just can¹t request the session because of the new meeting B format.
Thank you,
Trang
-----Original Message----- From: <iotf-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of "Gannon, James-1" <james-1.gannon@novartis.com> Date: Tuesday, May 3, 2016 at 8:05 AM To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Alissa Cooper via Iotf <iotf@icann.org> Subject: Re: [IOTF] ICANN 56 scheduling
Hi All, Any follow-up on Alissa's request below?
James Gannon IGM Manager Projects & IT Security SME
-----Original Message----- From: iotf-bounces@icann.org [mailto:iotf-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Alissa Cooper Sent: 28 April 2016 23:30 To: Alissa Cooper via Iotf Subject: [IOTF] ICANN 56 scheduling
I was thinking that it¹s probably around the time that ICANN staff are starting to put together the agenda for ICANN 56 (although you all would know better than me, since the ICG is not meeting). I think given the timing of ICANN 56 it will be important to have a session where an implementation update can be provided by this group, including both the community reps and the ICANN staff, and the community can have an opportunity to comment and ask questions. Wanted to flag that idea in case agenda requests are already going in. I will not be in Helsinki but will follow remotely.
Alissa _______________________________________________ IOTF mailing list IOTF@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/iotf _______________________________________________ IOTF mailing list IOTF@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/iotf
IOTF mailing list IOTF@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/iotf _______________________________________________ IOTF mailing list IOTF@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/iotf
-- Matthew Shears | Director, Global Internet Policy & Human Rights Project Center for Democracy & Technology | cdt.org E: mshears@cdt.org | T: +44.771.247.2987
Hi Chuck, I think 60-75 minute should suffice, but perhaps others would like to weigh in on this as well? As for time slots, I don’t have any particular preference. Trang -----Original Message----- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com> Date: Friday, May 6, 2016 at 1:18 PM To: Trang Nguyen <trang.nguyen@icann.org>, "Gannon, James-1" <james-1.gannon@novartis.com>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Alissa Cooper via Iotf <iotf@icann.org> Cc: Hillary Jett <hillary.jett@icann.org>, "Austin, Donna (Donna.Austin@neustar.biz)" <Donna.Austin@neustar.biz> Subject: RE: [IOTF] ICANN 56 scheduling
Trang,
My understanding is that the community meetings team is getting close to finalizing the Helsinki schedule so it would be good to nail this down as soon as possible. I know that one of the things they are trying to do is to minimize conflicts so it would seem to me that getting them involved as soon as possible is important. I cc'd Donna Austin because she has been representing the GNSO on the meetings team. Hopefully she can at least inform the team of the need and maybe even make some suggestions. How much time is needed? Any more than an hour? Have you considered doing it over a lunch break?
Chuck
-----Original Message----- From: iotf-bounces@icann.org [mailto:iotf-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Trang Nguyen Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 3:21 PM To: Gannon, James-1; Alissa Cooper; Alissa Cooper via Iotf Cc: Hillary Jett Subject: Re: [IOTF] ICANN 56 scheduling
All,
Apologies for the delay in responding to this. We had to do a bit of checking internally regarding the process to request sessions for the new meeting B format.
There are no issues with holding a transition implementation planning update session at ICANN56. From a process perspective, the request would just need to go through an SO or AC because all sessions at ICANN56 are scheduled by SOs and ACs. Many of you participate in an ICANN SO or AC so perhaps someone from the group could volunteer to propose this through an SO or AC? My team and I would be more than happy to help with any of the logistics. We just can¹t request the session because of the new meeting B format.
Thank you,
Trang
-----Original Message----- From: <iotf-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of "Gannon, James-1" <james-1.gannon@novartis.com> Date: Tuesday, May 3, 2016 at 8:05 AM To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Alissa Cooper via Iotf <iotf@icann.org> Subject: Re: [IOTF] ICANN 56 scheduling
Hi All, Any follow-up on Alissa's request below?
James Gannon IGM Manager Projects & IT Security SME
-----Original Message----- From: iotf-bounces@icann.org [mailto:iotf-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Alissa Cooper Sent: 28 April 2016 23:30 To: Alissa Cooper via Iotf Subject: [IOTF] ICANN 56 scheduling
I was thinking that it¹s probably around the time that ICANN staff are starting to put together the agenda for ICANN 56 (although you all would know better than me, since the ICG is not meeting). I think given the timing of ICANN 56 it will be important to have a session where an implementation update can be provided by this group, including both the community reps and the ICANN staff, and the community can have an opportunity to comment and ask questions. Wanted to flag that idea in case agenda requests are already going in. I will not be in Helsinki but will follow remotely.
Alissa _______________________________________________ IOTF mailing list IOTF@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/iotf _______________________________________________ IOTF mailing list IOTF@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/iotf
_______________________________________________ IOTF mailing list IOTF@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/iotf
participants (5)
-
Alissa Cooper -
Gannon, James-1 -
Gomes, Chuck -
Matthew Shears -
Trang Nguyen