August 2015 - IPC-GNSO - lists.icann.org

Fwd: [Soac-infoalert] PPSAI WG - Status Update and Observations - ICANN
by Greg Shatan Aug. 6, 2015

Aug. 6, 2015

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: *David Olive* <david.olive(a)icann.org> Date: Thursday, August 6, 2015 Subject: [Soac-infoalert] PPSAI WG - Status Update and Observations - ICANN To: "soac-infoalert(a)icann.org" <soac-infoalert(a)icann.org> As the co-chairs of the Working Group for Privacy and Proxy Services Accreditation Issues, we are writing this blog post to try to answer some of the questions that have been raised by the broader Internet community regarding the status of our work. We also will describe the process that a community-based Working Group uses to develop consensus-based policy proposals for consideration by the ICANN Board in order to add context. Don Blumenthal, Graeme Bunton & Steven Metalitz (Working Group co-chairs) Read the entire blog at: https://www.icann.org/news/blog/ppsai-wg-status-update-and-observations Sent from my iPhone David A. Olive Vice President, Policy Development Support General Manager, ICANN Regional Headquarters –Istanbul Hakki Yeten Cad. Selenium Plaza No:10/C K:10 34349 Fulya, Besiktas, Istanbul Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct Line: +90.212.999.6212 Mobile: + 1. 202.341.3611 <+%201.%20202.341.3611> Mobile: +90.533.341.6550 Email: david.olive(a)icann.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','david.olive(a)icann.org');> www.icann.org

1 0

Reminder: Draft Comment: GNSO Translation and Transliteration of contact Information PDP Recommendations for the ICANN Board / Due date: August 10, 2015
by Petter Rindforth Aug. 5, 2015

Aug. 5, 2015

Dear All, Just a reminder that we are now only one week away from the due date of August 10, 2015 to file comments to the GNSO Translation and Transliteration of contact Information PDP Recommendations for the ICANN Board. I enclose again the two draft versions. I personally prefer Version No 1, as this is fully in line with our previous comments as well as with the IPC work within the WG, but I am ofcourse open for any suggested changes, etc. Best,Petter -- Petter Rindforth, LL M Fenix Legal KB Stureplan 4c, 4tr 114 35 Stockholm Sweden Fax: +46(0)8-4631010 Direct phone: +46(0)702-369360 E-mail: petter.rindforth(a)fenixlegal.eu www.fenixlegal.eu ---------- Vidarebefordrat meddelande ---------- Från: Petter Rindforth <petter.rindforth(a)fenixlegal.eu> Datum: Tue Jul 28 2015 18:31:30 GMT+0200 (Västeuropa, sommartid) Ämne: Draft Comment: GNSO Translation and Transliteration of contact Information PDP Recommendations for the ICANN Board / Due date: August 10, 2015 Till: listserv(a)ipconstituency.org Dear All, Please find enclosed two initial versions of IPC’s comments: Version 1: Based on our two previous comments during the WG’s work Version 2: The same as V1, however, with a note that “our comments below apply only to transformation in ASCII TLDs”. Looking forward to your feedback / changes, etc, having in mind that the due date to file these comments is August 10, 2015. Best regards, Petter -- Petter Rindforth, LL M Fenix Legal KB Stureplan 4c, 4tr 114 35 Stockholm Sweden Fax: +46(0)8-4631010 Direct phone: +46(0)702-369360 E-mail: petter.rindforth(a)fenixlegal.eu www.fenixlegal.eu NOTICE This e-mail message is intended solely for the individual or individuals to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential attorney-client privileged information and attorney work product. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are requested not to read, copy or distribute it or any of the information it contains. Please delete it immediately and notify us by return e-mail. Fenix Legal KB, Sweden, www.fenixlegal.eu Thank you

4 4

REMINDER: WEBINAR: Briefing on 2nd Draft CCWG-Accountability Proposal
by Greg Shatan Aug. 4, 2015

Aug. 4, 2015

REMINDER: There is a Webinar today for the CCWG-Accountability at 19:00 UTC. If you are in the Americas, this is the one for you. The Friday webinar is at 07:00 UTC, which is not so good for the Americas. I particularly recommend the Webinar if you are intending to draft or review the IPC Public Comment. Greg ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc(a)gmail.com> Date: Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:47 AM Subject: WEBINAR: Briefing on 2nd Draft CCWG-Accountability Proposal To: IPC-GNSO <ipc-gnso(a)icann.org> WEBINAR: Briefing on 2nd Draft CCWG-Accountability Proposal <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2015-07-30-en#> <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2015-07-30-en#> <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2015-07-30-en#> <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2015-07-30-en#> <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2015-07-30-en#> <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2015-07-30-en#> The CCWG-Accountability will be publishing its 2nd draft for 40-day public comment on *3 August 2015*. Community feedback is requested on this 2nd draft proposal of proposed enhancements to ICANN's accountability framework that the CCWG-Accountability has identified as essential to happen or be committed to before the IANA Stewardship Transition takes place (Work Stream 1). Community feedback will help the CCWG-Accountability to improve its proposal and carry on with next steps, including Chartering Organizations' endorsement of the CCWG-Accountability output before it is submitted to the ICANN Board during or after ICANN 54 in Dublin in October 2015. In order to brief the community on the contents of their 2nd draft proposal, the CCWG-Accountability Chairs will host two identical briefing webinars on 4 and 7 August at different times to facilitate participation across time zones. The webinars will take place on: - *4 August from 19:00 – 21:00 UTC* (time zone converter here <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=CCWG-Accountabilit…> ) - *7 August from 07:00 – 09:00 UTC* (time zone converter here <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=CCWG-Accountabilit…> ) Webinars will be conducted in English. Live interpretation services are available in Arabic, Chinese, French, Spanish, Portuguese, and Russian. ------------------------------ *Webinar Details & How to Attend* The webinars will be run in an Adobe Connect room <https://icann.adobeconnect.com/si-webinar/>. If you are interested in attending the webinar and would like to receive dial-in details, please send an email to acct-staff(a)icann.org and indicate: 1. The time at which you would like to attend the webinar; and 2. Your language request (if requested). Live interpretation services are available in Arabic, Chinese, French, Spanish, Portuguese, and Russian. Please note that the webinars will be recorded and transcribed. Subsequently the transcripts will be posted on the CCWG-Accountability Wiki here <https://community.icann.org/x/SYtCAw>. ------------------------------ *Further information* For further information about the CCWG-Accountability's work, please see https://community.icann.org/x/ogDxAg. For further information about the related IANA Stewardship Transition, please seehttps://www.icann.org/stewardship or https://www.ianacg.org. From: <accountability-cross-community-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of " villa(a)reduniv.edu.cu" <villa(a)reduniv.edu.cu> Date: Friday, July 31, 2015 at 11:18 AM To: Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community(a)icann.org > Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] CCWG Webinars Hi all, good morning! Is there any official communication about the CCGW Webinars next week? I would like to have it to share it with our respective communities. The one shared by Alissa Cooper about the ICG Webinars is a good example. Regards, Jorge _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

1 0

Fwd: [Soac-infoalert] Fwd: [global leads] [icann-board] ICANN News Alert -- Proposed ICANN Bylaws Amendments—GNSO Policy & Implementation Recommendations
by Greg Shatan Aug. 3, 2015

Aug. 3, 2015

All, Please see below. Congratulations again to my fellow members of the Policy & Implementation Working Group (including Michael Graham and Anne Aikman-Scalese of the IPC) for all the hard work. It's great to see the end result! Greg Shatan IPC President ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Olive <david.olive(a)icann.org> Date: Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 2:19 AM Subject: [Soac-infoalert] Fwd: [global leads] [icann-board] ICANN News Alert -- Proposed ICANN Bylaws Amendments—GNSO Policy & Implementation Recommendations To: "soac-infoalert(a)icann.org" <soac-infoalert(a)icann.org> [image: ICANN] <https://www.icann.org/> News Alert https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-3-2015-07-31-en ------------------------------ Proposed ICANN Bylaws Amendments—GNSO Policy & Implementation Recommendations 31 July 2015 *Forum Announcement:* Comment Period Opens on *Date:* 31 July 2015 *Categories/Tags:* Policy Processes *Purpose (Brief):* During its meeting on 24 June 2015, the GNSO Council unanimously adopted the recommendations of the GNSO Policy & Implementation Working Group (see: http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/policy-implementation-recommendations-01jun…) which was tasked to address a number of questions as they relate to GNSO policy and implementation. Among others, these recommendations include three proposed new GNSO processes, two of which—the GNSO Guidance Process (GGP) and the GNSO Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP)—require changes to the ICANN Bylaws1 <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/bylaws-amendments-2015-07-31-en#foot1> subject to ICANN Board approval. Per its resolution of 28 July 2015 (see: https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2015-07-28-en#1.c) the ICANN Board has directed that these proposed changes to the ICANN Bylaws be posted for public comment prior to ICANN Board consideration. *Public Comment Box Link:* https://www.icann.org/public-comments/bylaws-amendments-2015-07-31-en 1 <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/bylaws-amendments-2015-07-31-en#note1>These proposed changes to the ICANN Bylaws are accompanied by a GGP and EPDP Manual, which can be found in Annex D and F of the GNSO Policy & Implementation Final Report (see: http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/policy-implementation-recommendations-01jun…) and would be incorporated into the GNSO Operating Procedures following adoption of the proposed ICANN Bylaws changes by the ICANN Board. _______________________________________________ soac-infoalert mailing list soac-infoalert(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/soac-infoalert

6 5

Fwd: [Internet Policy] New document: Perspectives on the IANA Stewardship Transition Principles
by Greg Shatan Aug. 3, 2015

Aug. 3, 2015

All: You may be interested in the following from ISOC, providing their perspectives on the IANA stewardship transition and broader Internet principles. (I have not read the blog post or document.) Greg ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Dan York <york(a)isoc.org> Date: Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 5:27 PM Subject: [Internet Policy] New document: Perspectives on the IANA Stewardship Transition Principles To: Internet Policy External <internetpolicy(a)elists.isoc.org> Internet-policy subscribers, Today we published a document providing our perspectives on the principles behind the IANA Stewardship Transition: https://www.internetsociety.org/doc/perspectives-iana-stewardship-transitio… As part of the release, Sally Wentworth published a blog post providing an overview: https://www.internetsociety.org/blog/public-policy/2015/07/perspectives-ian… With the IANA Coordination Group (ICG) poised to release its call for public comments on a combined proposal to transition the stewardship of the IANA functions and important progress underway in the accountability discussions, we believe it is critical that we understand how the IANA stewardship principles as well as the IANA functions fit into the broader context of the Internet's operations and and international consensus. Our main goal was to show how these so-called NTIA criteria reflect broader Internet principles which have been adopted and embedded through years of global consensus. As we enter this next stage of the evaluation of the ICG proposal, we hope that this document will help in moving that discussion forward to achieving the global, open, secure and stable Internet we all seek. Regards, Dan -- Dan York Senior Content Strategist, Internet Society york(a)isoc.org +1-802-735-1624 Jabber: york(a)jabber.isoc.org Skype: danyork http://twitter.com/danyork http://www.internetsociety.org/ <http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/> _______________________________________________ To manage your ISOC subscriptions or unsubscribe, please log into the ISOC Member Portal: https://portal.isoc.org/ Then choose Interests & Subscriptions from the My Account menu.

1 0

Fwd: myICANN.org Daily Briefing
by Greg Shatan Aug. 3, 2015

Aug. 3, 2015

FYI ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <noreply(a)myicann.org> Date: 2015-08-03 9:01 GMT-04:00 Subject: myICANN.org Daily Briefing To: gregshatanipc(a)gmail.com [image: myICANN Daily Briefing] Monday, August 03 2015 In Today's Issue: ICANN Content <https://u232885.ct.sendgrid.net/wf/click?upn=C-2FTm5-2F-2BfGhCe7N1E04Q59Kce…> 一名 NextGen 成员的 ICANN 第 53 届会议参会体验 <https://u232885.ct.sendgrid.net/wf/click?upn=C-2FTm5-2F-2BfGhCe7N1E04Q59Kce…> Sunday, August 02 2015 03:00 AM NextGen@ICANN 项目成立的时间并不长，始于 ICANN 第 49 届新加坡会议。从这点来看，看到 ICANN 第 53 届会议 NextGen@ICANN 项目申请已开放，确实令人感到惊讶。第 53 届会议是在距离巴西不远的寒冷城市布宜诺斯艾利斯举行的。我在提交申请的时候并不清楚此项目对我有何要求，因为当时关于这个项目的可用信息并不是很多。我唯一清楚的一点就是，对于来自会议参与地区的年轻人来说，这是千载难逢的好机会。对于像我一样攻读互联网相关专业硕士学位者来说，这个申请理由已经足够充分。根据官方消息 ( https://www.icann.org/news/blog/mee... 如今无 DNSSEC 的 DNS 属于“可以原谅”的系统 <https://u232885.ct.sendgrid.net/wf/click?upn=C-2FTm5-2F-2BfGhCe7N1E04Q59Kce…> Thursday, July 30 2015 03:00 AM "可以原谅的系统"可能听起来非常不严谨，但这是事实。这篇博客的标题源自于在肯尼亚内罗毕举行的 2015 年非洲域名系统论坛期间 DNSSEC 主题会议上一位参与者的发言。该会议是关于 DNSSEC 的技术圆桌会议，由我担任主持人，参与者将近 50 人；参加会议的主要专家包括：欧拉夫·科尔克曼（Olaf Kolkman，国际互联网协会）、乔•艾卜利（Joey Abley，DYN）、马克·埃尔金斯（Mark Elkins，DNS）、菲尔·勒尼奥（Phil Regnault，NSRC），他们就 DNSSEC 如何赋予更多安全保护分享了自己的看法和从过去的丰富经历中学到的一些经验。为什... ICANN Content (2) <#14ef3a6bf31ff241_sub47,108> These Topics Have No New Items Today: gTLDs ccTLDs Security & Stability SSAC Registry Service Evaluation Process Registrars & Registries Public Comments: Thick Whois Initial Report GNSO Policy Development Process Public Comments: Study on Whois Privacy & Proxy Service Abuse Public Comments: Rights Protection Mechanism (RPM) Requirements Public Comments: Questions to the Community on Accountability and Transparency within ICANN Public Comments: Proposed Modification of GNSO Operating Procedures... Public Comments: New gTLD Board Committee Consideration of GAC Safeguard Advice Public Comments: Modification of GNSO Operating Procedures Concerning the Deadline for the Submission of Reports and Motions Public Comments: Initial Report on Protection of IGO and INGO Identifiers in All gTLDs Public Comments: GNSO Structures Charter Amendment Process Public Comments: Draft Final Report on Protection of IGO and INGO Identifiers in All gTLDs Public Comments: Draft Final Report ccNSO Study Group on the Use of Country and Territory Names ... Public Comment Forum Press Releases and Media Advisories Nominating Committee New gTLD Announcements Internet Governance Topics ICANN news in your language ICANN blog ICANN Public Planning & Strategic Engagement ICANN Ombudsman Blog ICANN Correspondence IANA GNSO GAC Domain Name Industry Topics DNRD/WHOIS Board Activity Board Announcements Copyright 2013 ICANN All Rights Reserved To change or remove this subscription, visit myICANN.org. <https://u232885.ct.sendgrid.net/wf/click?upn=mYTPji2RtvMDCTg0Wx32JazZDgsAxf…> ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive Suite 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536

1 0

Fwd: [Soac-infoalert] Fwd: [global leads] [icann-board] ICANN News Alert -- US Circuit Court Upholds ICANN's Defense of the New gTLD Program
by Greg Shatan Aug. 1, 2015

Aug. 1, 2015

All, This may be of interest to you. Greg ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Olive <david.olive(a)icann.org> Date: Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 2:28 AM Subject: [Soac-infoalert] Fwd: [global leads] [icann-board] ICANN News Alert -- US Circuit Court Upholds ICANN's Defense of the New gTLD Program To: "soac-infoalert(a)icann.org" <soac-infoalert(a)icann.org> [image: ICANN] <https://www.icann.org/> News Alert https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2015-07-31-en ------------------------------ US Circuit Court Upholds ICANN's Defense of the New gTLD Program 31 July 2015 *Los Angeles, California*... The United States' Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed the dismissal of antitrust and other claims against ICANN made by a company called name.space, related to ICANN's new generic Top Level Domain (gTLD) Program, in an opinion published today <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/namespace-ninth-circuit-affirmi…> [PDF, 116 KB]. In 2013, a federal district court dismissed all of name.space's claims, and today the Ninth Circuit affirmed that dismissal in all respects. name.space alleged that ICANN violated the Sherman Act, and various trademark and other laws, in establishing the New gTLD Program and setting the application fee for new gTLD applications at US$185,000. name.space also suggested that ICANN should set aside names found in name.space's “alternative internet.” The plaintiff claimed that the rules and procedures governing the 2012 New gTLD Program Application Round were the result of an illegal conspiracy between ICANN, its board members and domain-name industry insiders, citing U.S. antitrust law (specifically Section 1 of the Sherman Act). "We are pleased that the Ninth Circuit agreed with the dismissal of the claims against ICANN in this matter", said John Jeffrey, ICANN's General Counsel and Secretary. "The rules and procedures governing the New gTLD Program were created through a global, inclusive, open and multistakeholder process, following a bottom-up policy development process leading to consensus-based policy recommendations. Accordingly, the Court found it could not "infer an anticompetitive agreement' from the facts presented in this case." In finding in favor of ICANN, the Court determined that “ICANN is not a competitor” in the three relevant markets the plaintiff identified as the basis of its monopolization claim (citing the tests from Section 2 of the Sherman Act): 1. The market to act as a TLD registry; 2. The international market for domain names; 3. The market for blocking or defensive registration services. Finally, the Court also found that name.space's trademark claims were not ripe, and its common law claims did not allege sufficient facts to be able to state a claim against ICANN. ICANN was represented in this matter by Jones Day. _______________________________________________ soac-infoalert mailing list soac-infoalert(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/soac-infoalert

1 0