Hi Guys Just getting back to NYC after a visit to ICANN LA HQ. Happy meetings with many. Thanks to Chantelle for arranging it. See you all in Johannesburg. Best Aslam G Mohamed RNA IP Attorneys India US +1 646 243 9857 HQ +91 124 2841222 [cid:9465C527-B622-4C5A-A8BB-44E5A53B33E5] On 26-May-2017, at 05:09, Jannik Skou <js@thomsentrampedach.com<mailto:js@thomsentrampedach.com>> wrote: Hi Brian Back from INTA Barcelona - I see your email with the idea for a call Tuesday/Wed. Did you guys have a call? (Sorry for missing out on that). was a hectic week as always during INTA. I see there a comments posted by INTA/BRG/BC https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-subsequent-procedures-22mar17/2017-M... Kind regards | Mit freundlichem Gruss, Jannik Skou, MBA Partner Thomsen Trampedach GmbH Grundstrasse 22a 6343 Rotkreuz Switzerland T +45.22275696 M js@thomsentrampedach.com<mailto:js@thomsentrampedach.com> W http://thomsentrampedach.com On 19 May 2017, at 23:14, Brian Scarpelli <BScarpelli@actonline.org<mailto:BScarpelli@actonline.org>> wrote: Dear IPC colleagues – apologies in advance for sending on a Friday afternoon but just a quick update/request re: IPC comments on the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG’s ‘Community Comment 2’ (background document and specific questions both attached), due on May 22. [I have attached the CC2 docs, and the IPC comments on CC1 are accessible at: http://bit.ly/2q53diK] We have not been able to get a draft comment together for IPC review yet and because of the approaching May 22 deadline would like to renew our request for volunteers to help us potentially put something together quickly on critical IPC issues. Would any further IPC members be able to help out with this? Also I have checked w Greg and we should be good to have our comments accepted if they are a little late (this is not a formal ICANN comment also). If it can help, we could hold a call if needed, so I created a quick doodle poll for next Tues and Wed afternoons: http://doodle.com/poll/cu5daq9f8wfzvgkt. If anyone wants to help out and can indicate times that work for them we can have a call to put our heads together on this comment during this call? -Brian From: Jannik Skou [mailto:js@thomsentrampedach.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 7:54 AM To: Brian Scarpelli <BScarpelli@actonline.org<mailto:BScarpelli@actonline.org>> Cc: Mike Rodenbaugh <mike@rodenbaugh.com<mailto:mike@rodenbaugh.com>>; Kiran Malancharuvil <Kiran.Malancharuvil@markmonitor.com<mailto:Kiran.Malancharuvil@markmonitor.com>>; Ariel Manoff <amanoff@vmf.com.ar<mailto:amanoff@vmf.com.ar>>; Aslam Mohamed <aslam@rnaip.com<mailto:aslam@rnaip.com>>; Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com<mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com>>; Chantelle Doerksen (chantelle.doerksen@icann.org<mailto:chantelle.doerksen@icann.org>) <chantelle.doerksen@icann.org<mailto:chantelle.doerksen@icann.org>>; listserv@ipconstituency.org<mailto:listserv@ipconstituency.org> Subject: Re: [IPC Discussion List] Drafting IPC Comments re: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Community Comment Request (due May 1) Hi Brian, Mike, Kiran, Paul, Hector and Aslam Please find attached my own comments already submitted. Your spread sheet makes sense. It seems very likely that the deadline will be extended to May 22nd. (see email from Jeff today) as the GAC has requested more time, as I understood it. I would suggest we organise a short call to discuss how we best put the comments together. Also maybe we could meet during GDD in Madrid and then discuss any points we seem to disagree on? (Provided the deadline is extended of course). I suggest a native US/UK member take the lead (also) on drafting final text :-) Kind regards | Mit freundlichem Gruss, Jannik Skou, MBA Partner Thomsen Trampedach GmbH Grundstrasse 22a 6343 Rotkreuz Switzerland T +45.22275696 M js@thomsentrampedach.com<mailto:js@thomsentrampedach.com> W http://thomsentrampedach.com On 18 Apr 2017, at 13:14, Brian Scarpelli <BScarpelli@actonline.org<mailto:BScarpelli@actonline.org>> wrote: (copying entire IPC in case we have additional volunteers) Dear Mike, Jannik, Paul, Kiran, Héctor & Aslam – thanks very much for volunteering to help with IPC input on the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG’s ‘Community Comment 2’ (background document and specific questions both attached). This comment is due May 1. I have created a pretty basic shared spreadsheet that we can use to organize input if that is helpful:http://bit.ly/2pM6FPN. Would anyone be interested in taking the lead in drafting for this comment? If I could help us get a call together I’m happy to do that. If it is helpful here’s a link to the IPC’s comments from August last year re: ‘Community Comment 1’: · IPC Response to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working Group’s First Request for Community Comments (19 August 2016) Lastly, for anyone who wants to take a look at the different comment opportunities for the IPC that we’ve been tracking, filed on, or are considering filing on, please visit: http://bit.ly/2oBY18z -Brian Brian Scarpelli Senior Policy Counsel 517-507-1446 | bscarpelli@actonline.org<mailto:bscarpelli@actonline.org> ACT | The App Association From: listserv@ipconstituency.simplelists.com<mailto:listserv@ipconstituency.simplelists.com> [mailto:listserv@ipconstituency.simplelists.com] On Behalf Of Brian Scarpelli Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 7:37 AM To: listserv@ipconstituency.org<mailto:listserv@ipconstituency.org> Cc: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com<mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com>>; Chantelle Doerksen (chantelle.doerksen@icann.org<mailto:chantelle.doerksen@icann.org>) <chantelle.doerksen@icann.org<mailto:chantelle.doerksen@icann.org>> Subject: [IPC Discussion List] Request for Volunteers -- New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Community Comment Request (due May 1) IPC colleagues – The leadership team of the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG is seeking community input through Community Comment 2, with comments requested by May 1. Please see attached for (1) a backgrounder and survey of subjects comments are requested on, and (2) specific questions the PDP WG is seeking responses to [both PDF and Word]. I plan to circulate a template for gathering our input soon. This survey is extensive and the IPC may only wish to provide answers to certain questions that relate to its own particular interests or concerns. Please let myself and Chantelle know if you are interested in helping with an IPC response to this survey. Brian Brian Scarpelli Senior Policy Counsel 517-507-1446 | bscarpelli@actonline.org<mailto:bscarpelli@actonline.org> ACT | The App Association <Community Comment 2 letter_IPC_20 March 2017.pdf><New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Community Comment 2.pdf> <Community Comment 2 letter_IPC_20 March 2017.pdf><New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Community Comment 2.pdf> ________________________________ IMPORTANT NOTICE - The contents of this email and attachments are confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. Copying or communicating any part of it to others is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, copy, distribute or rely on this email and should please return it immediately or notify us by telephone. While we take every reasonable precaution to screen out computer viruses from emails, attachments to this email may contain such viruses. We cannot accept liability for loss or damage resulting from such viruses. The integrity of email across the Internet cannot be guaranteed and RNA will not accept liability for any claims arising as a result of the use of this medium for transmissions by or to RNA.
