Em 17 de jul. de 2023, à(s) 15:09, Steve Crocker <steve@shinkuro.com> escreveu:
If I heard correctly, the Phase I WG said they couldn’t reach agreement on the details and left it to the implementation team— that’s us — to work out the details. In my view, that’s exactly where this proposal fits.
If this group feels this proposal cannot be adopted because it doesn’t fit within the confines of the policy decisions made earlier, we’re going to wind up without a workable solution. That will lead to reopening the policy process and returning to exactly where we are now. Better for us to propose a workable solution.
With the difference that the policy process is only limited by the charter, while the implementation is limited by the policy outcome. So I wouldn’t assume that the policy process couldn’t achieve what the implementation team did not. Also to note is that only the urgent request aspect of the policy would need a focused policy process. Everything else in the RegData PDP could move forward. So, instead of 2 business days, those requests would get up to 30 days for the time being.
This proposal implies some expense for ICANN but little or no additional expense to registrars.
Last I heard lawyers are not free on any reasonable jurisdiction, so there is additional - and significant - expense to registrars. Rubens