Dear IRT, I asked Andrea to cancel the IRT session at ICANN76 that had been scheduled for 16 March 2023. I had planned to coordinate and collaborate to build our 18-month implementation plan at the session. However, I don’t think we’ll be ready to have that discussion just yet. As you know, we’ve received a large number of public comments requiring review and consideration. IPT is currently going over each and every comment for potential impact on the implementation requirement and the policy language. I’d also like to conduct a few more interviews with the implementers to gain insights to build a proposed baseline plan after the ICANN76. I expect that Registration Data policy implementation could be a subject of some of the sessions you are attending; please share any outcome with the IRT when you note them. To those traveling this week to Cancun, I wish you a pleasant and safe journey. Unfortunately, I won’t be able to join you this time but you’ll see me fully participating remotely. Please feel free to chat me up or call me along the way. -- Kind Regards, Dennis S. Chang GDD Programs Director Phone: +1 213 293 7889 Sykpe: dennisSchang www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org> One World – One Internet
Hi Dennis, Thanks for the update, however I am a little confused. You mention that you are following up with implementers but it’s not clear how that can delay implementing a policy. It was my assumption that the parties implementing this (registrars and registries) are well aware of the requirements, and ICANN provides an effective date that we then all comply with. Are there any significant concerns raised by registrars and registries regarding the implementation of this policy? If there are, then I think this is something for the IRT to consider. Nothing in the policy should be a surprise to contracted parties- this has been under discussion/consideration for almost 5 years now, and EPDP Phase 1 Final Report was approved by the ICANN Board in May 2019. If the implementers you are referring to are non-CPH, can you please provide some additional information regarding the nature of these concerns? I think this should be something the full IRT considers. Regards, Owen
On Mar 6, 2023, at 14:20, Dennis Chang via IRT.RegDataPolicy <irt.regdatapolicy@icann.org> wrote:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe. Dear IRT,
I asked Andrea to cancel the IRT session at ICANN76 that had been scheduled for 16 March 2023.
I had planned to coordinate and collaborate to build our 18-month implementation plan at the session. However, I don’t think we’ll be ready to have that discussion just yet.
As you know, we’ve received a large number of public comments requiring review and consideration. IPT is currently going over each and every comment for potential impact on the implementation requirement and the policy language. I’d also like to conduct a few more interviews with the implementers to gain insights to build a proposed baseline plan after the ICANN76.
I expect that Registration Data policy implementation could be a subject of some of the sessions you are attending; please share any outcome with the IRT when you note them.
To those traveling this week to Cancun, I wish you a pleasant and safe journey. Unfortunately, I won’t be able to join you this time but you’ll see me fully participating remotely. Please feel free to chat me up or call me along the way.
-- Kind Regards, Dennis S. Chang GDD Programs Director Phone: +1 213 293 7889 Sykpe: dennisSchang www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org/> One World – One Internet ******************** CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe. ********************
_______________________________________________ IRT.RegDataPolicy mailing list IRT.RegDataPolicy@icann.org <mailto:IRT.RegDataPolicy@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/irt.regdatapolicy
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Hi Owen, I see a little confusion and I’ll try to clear it up here. My discussion with the implementers is to gain understanding of the implementation from their perspective. It’s the same conversation I had with you and Essie that Cyrus hosted. It does not delay implementing a policy but helps in that implementation. Not all are as well aware of our policy implementation as you are. Therefore, it will be our job to make them aware so no one is surprised. To facilitate the understanding of this policy implementation, IPT is currently working on an educational material that could be used by the implementers to communicate with their counterparts in their organization. I’ll bring this to the IRT for feedback before we provide it to the community in general. I haven’t heard of any significant concerns but there is a recognition that this policy will introduce potential divergent paths for implementation. The interdependent nature of this policy implementation requires much cooperation among the implementers. What’s important at the moment is the evaluation of the public comments. As you know, there is a significant number of public comments that need to be evaluated for potential impact of the policy implementation requirements. There are implementers that are non-CPH. Data Escrow Agents and EBERO Service providers are examples. I’ve not had a chance to speak to them yet but planned to after ICANN76. I’ll share my findings with the IRT when I ask for your input on a proposed approach for collaborative implementation. Thanks Dennis Chang From: "IRT.RegDataPolicy" <irt.regdatapolicy-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of "Owen Smigelski via IRT.RegDataPolicy" <irt.regdatapolicy@icann.org> Reply-To: Owen Smigelski <owen.smigelski@namecheap.com> Date: Monday, March 6, 2023 at 16:47 To: "Andrea Glandon via IRT.RegDataPolicy" <irt.regdatapolicy@icann.org> Subject: Re: [IRT.RegDataPolicy] ICANN76 IRT Session - cancelled Hi Dennis, Thanks for the update, however I am a little confused. You mention that you are following up with implementers but it’s not clear how that can delay implementing a policy. It was my assumption that the parties implementing this (registrars and registries) are well aware of the requirements, and ICANN provides an effective date that we then all comply with. Are there any significant concerns raised by registrars and registries regarding the implementation of this policy? If there are, then I think this is something for the IRT to consider. Nothing in the policy should be a surprise to contracted parties- this has been under discussion/consideration for almost 5 years now, and EPDP Phase 1 Final Report was approved by the ICANN Board in May 2019. If the implementers you are referring to are non-CPH, can you please provide some additional information regarding the nature of these concerns? I think this should be something the full IRT considers. Regards, Owen On Mar 6, 2023, at 14:20, Dennis Chang via IRT.RegDataPolicy <irt.regdatapolicy@icann.org> wrote: CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe. Dear IRT, I asked Andrea to cancel the IRT session at ICANN76 that had been scheduled for 16 March 2023. I had planned to coordinate and collaborate to build our 18-month implementation plan at the session. However, I don’t think we’ll be ready to have that discussion just yet. As you know, we’ve received a large number of public comments requiring review and consideration. IPT is currently going over each and every comment for potential impact on the implementation requirement and the policy language. I’d also like to conduct a few more interviews with the implementers to gain insights to build a proposed baseline plan after the ICANN76. I expect that Registration Data policy implementation could be a subject of some of the sessions you are attending; please share any outcome with the IRT when you note them. To those traveling this week to Cancun, I wish you a pleasant and safe journey. Unfortunately, I won’t be able to join you this time but you’ll see me fully participating remotely. Please feel free to chat me up or call me along the way. -- Kind Regards, Dennis S. Chang GDD Programs Director Phone: +1 213 293 7889 Sykpe: dennisSchang www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org/> One World – One Internet ******************** CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe. ******************** _______________________________________________ IRT.RegDataPolicy mailing list IRT.RegDataPolicy@icann.org<mailto:IRT.RegDataPolicy@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/irt.regdatapolicy _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Thank you Dennis the public comments could be hard and not necessarily consistent. regards *Betty FAUSTA -* Mobile : +590 (0) 690 4973 09 (Guadeloupe) Fax : +33 (0) 972 2278 55 Contacts : Skype BETFAU | Pin BBM : 76521821 | Whats'app &Viber Le lun. 6 mars 2023, à 18 h 20, Dennis Chang via IRT.RegDataPolicy < irt.regdatapolicy@icann.org> a écrit :
Dear IRT,
I asked Andrea to cancel the IRT session at ICANN76 that had been scheduled for 16 March 2023.
I had planned to coordinate and collaborate to build our 18-month implementation plan at the session. However, I don’t think we’ll be ready to have that discussion just yet.
As you know, we’ve received a large number of public comments requiring review and consideration. IPT is currently going over each and every comment for potential impact on the implementation requirement and the policy language. I’d also like to conduct a few more interviews with the implementers to gain insights to build a proposed baseline plan after the ICANN76.
I expect that Registration Data policy implementation could be a subject of some of the sessions you are attending; please share any outcome with the IRT when you note them.
To those traveling this week to Cancun, I wish you a pleasant and safe journey. Unfortunately, I won’t be able to join you this time but you’ll see me fully participating remotely. Please feel free to chat me up or call me along the way.
--
Kind Regards,
Dennis S. Chang
GDD Programs Director
Phone: +1 213 293 7889
Sykpe: dennisSchang
www.icann.org One World – One Internet _______________________________________________ IRT.RegDataPolicy mailing list IRT.RegDataPolicy@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/irt.regdatapolicy
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Hi Betty, Thanks Betty for your understanding. You are indeed correct that working though the public comment is difficult and time consuming. Of the 518 comments, we’ve identified 269 comments requiring further careful evaluation and consideration. IPT is doing the detailed work to evaluate for potential impact to the policy implementation requirements and IRT will be asked to review our work when we are done. I’ve chosen to do it this way to conserve the IRT efforts to tasks that we really need you for. Thanks Dennis Chang From: BF <bettyfausta@gmail.com> Date: Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 06:56 To: Dennis Chang <dennis.chang@icann.org> Cc: "Andrea Glandon via IRT.RegDataPolicy" <irt.regdatapolicy@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [IRT.RegDataPolicy] ICANN76 IRT Session - cancelled Thank you Dennis the public comments could be hard and not necessarily consistent. regards Betty FAUSTA - Mobile : +590 (0) 690 4973 09 (Guadeloupe) Fax : +33 (0) 972 2278 55 Contacts : Skype BETFAU | Pin BBM : 76521821 | Whats'app &Viber Le lun. 6 mars 2023, à 18 h 20, Dennis Chang via IRT.RegDataPolicy <irt.regdatapolicy@icann.org<mailto:irt.regdatapolicy@icann.org>> a écrit : Dear IRT, I asked Andrea to cancel the IRT session at ICANN76 that had been scheduled for 16 March 2023. I had planned to coordinate and collaborate to build our 18-month implementation plan at the session. However, I don’t think we’ll be ready to have that discussion just yet. As you know, we’ve received a large number of public comments requiring review and consideration. IPT is currently going over each and every comment for potential impact on the implementation requirement and the policy language. I’d also like to conduct a few more interviews with the implementers to gain insights to build a proposed baseline plan after the ICANN76. I expect that Registration Data policy implementation could be a subject of some of the sessions you are attending; please share any outcome with the IRT when you note them. To those traveling this week to Cancun, I wish you a pleasant and safe journey. Unfortunately, I won’t be able to join you this time but you’ll see me fully participating remotely. Please feel free to chat me up or call me along the way. -- Kind Regards, Dennis S. Chang GDD Programs Director Phone: +1 213 293 7889 Sykpe: dennisSchang www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org> One World – One Internet _______________________________________________ IRT.RegDataPolicy mailing list IRT.RegDataPolicy@icann.org<mailto:IRT.RegDataPolicy@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/irt.regdatapolicy _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Dennis, I’ve been thinking about this email and 269 comments that require further evaluation and consideration are a lot to get through. Do you have this list identified and can you share it with the IRT now? From your email, it sounds like you don’t want to share more until the IPT has finished its evaluation. That said, I think it would be helpful if we could review those comments ahead of time, potentially speeding up subsequent tasks? Either way, do you have an estimate on when you will be able to share the IPT’s detailed evaluation for IRT review? Best, Marc From: IRT.RegDataPolicy <irt.regdatapolicy-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Dennis Chang via IRT.RegDataPolicy Sent: Friday, March 10, 2023 7:23 PM To: BF <bettyfausta@gmail.com> Cc: Andrea Glandon via IRT.RegDataPolicy <irt.regdatapolicy@icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [IRT.RegDataPolicy] [Ext] Re: ICANN76 IRT Session - cancelled Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Betty, Thanks Betty for your understanding. You are indeed correct that working though the public comment is difficult and time consuming. Of the 518 comments, we’ve identified 269 comments requiring further careful evaluation and consideration. IPT is doing the detailed work to evaluate for potential impact to the policy implementation requirements and IRT will be asked to review our work when we are done. I’ve chosen to do it this way to conserve the IRT efforts to tasks that we really need you for. Thanks Dennis Chang From: BF <bettyfausta@gmail.com <mailto:bettyfausta@gmail.com> > Date: Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 06:56 To: Dennis Chang <dennis.chang@icann.org <mailto:dennis.chang@icann.org> > Cc: "Andrea Glandon via IRT.RegDataPolicy" <irt.regdatapolicy@icann.org <mailto:irt.regdatapolicy@icann.org> > Subject: [Ext] Re: [IRT.RegDataPolicy] ICANN76 IRT Session - cancelled Thank you Dennis the public comments could be hard and not necessarily consistent. regards Betty FAUSTA - Mobile : +590 (0) 690 4973 09 (Guadeloupe) Fax : +33 (0) 972 2278 55 Contacts : Skype BETFAU | Pin BBM : 76521821 | Whats'app &Viber Le lun. 6 mars 2023, à 18 h 20, Dennis Chang via IRT.RegDataPolicy <irt.regdatapolicy@icann.org <mailto:irt.regdatapolicy@icann.org> > a écrit : Dear IRT, I asked Andrea to cancel the IRT session at ICANN76 that had been scheduled for 16 March 2023. I had planned to coordinate and collaborate to build our 18-month implementation plan at the session. However, I don’t think we’ll be ready to have that discussion just yet. As you know, we’ve received a large number of public comments requiring review and consideration. IPT is currently going over each and every comment for potential impact on the implementation requirement and the policy language. I’d also like to conduct a few more interviews with the implementers to gain insights to build a proposed baseline plan after the ICANN76. I expect that Registration Data policy implementation could be a subject of some of the sessions you are attending; please share any outcome with the IRT when you note them. To those traveling this week to Cancun, I wish you a pleasant and safe journey. Unfortunately, I won’t be able to join you this time but you’ll see me fully participating remotely. Please feel free to chat me up or call me along the way. -- Kind Regards, Dennis S. Chang GDD Programs Director Phone: +1 213 293 7889 Sykpe: dennisSchang <http://secure-web.cisco.com/1K-TKYPh2HGx6Ren297WBC4EMuL_1Rl-WkEjFvfcdRXRcMhL...> www.icann.org One World – One Internet _______________________________________________ IRT.RegDataPolicy mailing list IRT.RegDataPolicy@icann.org <mailto:IRT.RegDataPolicy@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/irt.regdatapolicy <https://secure-web.cisco.com/1naVxaUYD7vaaJyd4US8e8spa3BAlQ4NkakSQN-26MPJKV9...> _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy <https://secure-web.cisco.com/16ouvNJP3xqFJRLv88k2NprSEISsJlw9cG4ID7SoQX-z4yy...> ) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos <https://secure-web.cisco.com/1V8kuBYODlE_zKHJkJSWYbvtJH9jaKmEdA4i96KHyUK4na6...> ). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Hi Marc, Thanks for your thoughts and offer to help. You are correct, I want the IPT to get well organized to a point to make the IRT review efficient. That said, I’ll see if there is a way to engage the IRT without slowing down the IPT. I am shooting for end of April to get it done where we could have a meaningful discussion on few selected comments. Of course, we’ll share the full analysis and evaluation with the IRT which we plan to post on the IRT wiki when done as we do with all of our work products. Thanks Dennis Chang From: "Anderson, Marc" <mcanderson@verisign.com> Date: Tuesday, March 21, 2023 at 10:32 To: Dennis Chang <dennis.chang@icann.org>, "irt.regdatapolicy@icann.org" <irt.regdatapolicy@icann.org> Subject: RE: [IRT.RegDataPolicy] [Ext] Re: ICANN76 IRT Session - cancelled Dennis, I’ve been thinking about this email and 269 comments that require further evaluation and consideration are a lot to get through. Do you have this list identified and can you share it with the IRT now? From your email, it sounds like you don’t want to share more until the IPT has finished its evaluation. That said, I think it would be helpful if we could review those comments ahead of time, potentially speeding up subsequent tasks? Either way, do you have an estimate on when you will be able to share the IPT’s detailed evaluation for IRT review? Best, Marc From: IRT.RegDataPolicy <irt.regdatapolicy-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Dennis Chang via IRT.RegDataPolicy Sent: Friday, March 10, 2023 7:23 PM To: BF <bettyfausta@gmail.com> Cc: Andrea Glandon via IRT.RegDataPolicy <irt.regdatapolicy@icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [IRT.RegDataPolicy] [Ext] Re: ICANN76 IRT Session - cancelled Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Betty, Thanks Betty for your understanding. You are indeed correct that working though the public comment is difficult and time consuming. Of the 518 comments, we’ve identified 269 comments requiring further careful evaluation and consideration. IPT is doing the detailed work to evaluate for potential impact to the policy implementation requirements and IRT will be asked to review our work when we are done. I’ve chosen to do it this way to conserve the IRT efforts to tasks that we really need you for. Thanks Dennis Chang From: BF <bettyfausta@gmail.com<mailto:bettyfausta@gmail.com>> Date: Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 06:56 To: Dennis Chang <dennis.chang@icann.org<mailto:dennis.chang@icann.org>> Cc: "Andrea Glandon via IRT.RegDataPolicy" <irt.regdatapolicy@icann.org<mailto:irt.regdatapolicy@icann.org>> Subject: [Ext] Re: [IRT.RegDataPolicy] ICANN76 IRT Session - cancelled Thank you Dennis the public comments could be hard and not necessarily consistent. regards Betty FAUSTA - Mobile : +590 (0) 690 4973 09 (Guadeloupe) Fax : +33 (0) 972 2278 55 Contacts : Skype BETFAU | Pin BBM : 76521821 | Whats'app &Viber Le lun. 6 mars 2023, à 18 h 20, Dennis Chang via IRT.RegDataPolicy <irt.regdatapolicy@icann.org<mailto:irt.regdatapolicy@icann.org>> a écrit : Dear IRT, I asked Andrea to cancel the IRT session at ICANN76 that had been scheduled for 16 March 2023. I had planned to coordinate and collaborate to build our 18-month implementation plan at the session. However, I don’t think we’ll be ready to have that discussion just yet. As you know, we’ve received a large number of public comments requiring review and consideration. IPT is currently going over each and every comment for potential impact on the implementation requirement and the policy language. I’d also like to conduct a few more interviews with the implementers to gain insights to build a proposed baseline plan after the ICANN76. I expect that Registration Data policy implementation could be a subject of some of the sessions you are attending; please share any outcome with the IRT when you note them. To those traveling this week to Cancun, I wish you a pleasant and safe journey. Unfortunately, I won’t be able to join you this time but you’ll see me fully participating remotely. Please feel free to chat me up or call me along the way. -- Kind Regards, Dennis S. Chang GDD Programs Director Phone: +1 213 293 7889 Sykpe: dennisSchang www.icann.org [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/secure-web.cisco.com/1K-TKYPh2HGx6Ren297WB...> One World – One Internet _______________________________________________ IRT.RegDataPolicy mailing list IRT.RegDataPolicy@icann.org<mailto:IRT.RegDataPolicy@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/irt.regdatapolicy [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1naVxaUYD7vaaJyd4US8...> _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/16ouvNJP3xqFJRLv88k2...>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos [secure-web.cisco.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/secure-web.cisco.com/1V8kuBYODlE_zKHJkJSW...>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Hi Dennis, Thanks for sending out this explanation. I was surprised to see the session cancelled, as I know we all want to conclude this work and get started on implementing the Policy. I’m of course in support of fully reviewing all feedback from the public comment period. Does the IPT have a target date for when the review will be completed? It’s already been more than six weeks since the report was issued. I was surprised to read that you are working on an “implementation plan”. I had expected that once the final round of comments were reviewed and addressed that the Policy would be published and that registrars and registries are then expected to comply within 18 months of that publication date. The questions that come to mind for me are: - Was this implementation plan discussed while the IRT was meeting regularly? I don’t remember hearing about it until now. - Is an implementation plan a standard part of any Policy outcome? I’m not familiar with anything similar from the 2016 Transfer Policy, which is the most comparable (in scale) policy change I can think of this morning. - What are the guidelines and processes for creating this implementation plan? Will it be a mandatory plan that all registrars and registries must follow when implementing the new Policy? - What does this implementation plan cover? Is it about how a registrar/registry implements the new Registration Data Policy, or does it relate to the other affected policies which are being updated as per Rec 27 from EPDP Phase 1? I thought all the policy changes have the same timing/compliance requirements. Thanks, -- Sarah Wyld, CIPP/E Policy & Privacy Manager Pronouns: she/they swyld@tucows.com From: Dennis Chang via IRT.RegDataPolicy Sent: March 6, 2023 5:20 PM To: Andrea Glandon via IRT.RegDataPolicy Subject: [IRT.RegDataPolicy] ICANN76 IRT Session - cancelled Dear IRT, I asked Andrea to cancel the IRT session at ICANN76 that had been scheduled for 16 March 2023. I had planned to coordinate and collaborate to build our 18-month implementation plan at the session. However, I don’t think we’ll be ready to have that discussion just yet. As you know, we’ve received a large number of public comments requiring review and consideration. IPT is currently going over each and every comment for potential impact on the implementation requirement and the policy language. I’d also like to conduct a few more interviews with the implementers to gain insights to build a proposed baseline plan after the ICANN76. I expect that Registration Data policy implementation could be a subject of some of the sessions you are attending; please share any outcome with the IRT when you note them. To those traveling this week to Cancun, I wish you a pleasant and safe journey. Unfortunately, I won’t be able to join you this time but you’ll see me fully participating remotely. Please feel free to chat me up or call me along the way. -- Kind Regards, Dennis S. Chang GDD Programs Director Phone: +1 213 293 7889 Sykpe: dennisSchang www.icann.org One World – One Internet
participants (5)
-
Anderson, Marc -
BF -
Dennis Chang -
Owen Smigelski -
Sarah Wyld