Re: [IRT.RegDataPolicy] [Ext] RE: IRT Task 204 Review Revosed Addendum II inOneDoc added for Rec 12 Supplemental Recommendation 20220419
Hi Sarah, Thanks for the question. You are correct, the text before the box is no longer considered and entirely replaced by the text in the box. I darkened the text to be replaced and commented for clarity. Thanks Dennis Chang From: Sarah Wyld <swyld@tucows.com> Date: Monday, April 18, 2022 at 07:41 To: Dennis Chang <dennis.chang@icann.org>, "Dennis Chang via IRT.RegDataPolicy" <irt.regdatapolicy@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] RE: [IRT.RegDataPolicy] IRT Task 204 Review Revosed Addendum II inOneDoc added for Rec 12 Supplemental Recommendation 20220419 Hi Dennis, Is the text in the box the entire new text, and the text before the box is no longer to be considered? Or does the box replace some of the preceding text? Thanks, -- Sarah Wyld, CIPP/E Policy & Privacy Manager Pronouns: she/they swyld@tucows.com<mailto:swyld@tucows.com> [cid:image001.png@01D85310.C3E9C810] From: Dennis Chang via IRT.RegDataPolicy<mailto:irt.regdatapolicy@icann.org> Sent: April 11, 2022 5:04 PM To: Dennis Chang via IRT.RegDataPolicy<mailto:irt.regdatapolicy@icann.org> Subject: [IRT.RegDataPolicy] IRT Task 204 Review Revosed Addendum II inOneDoc added for Rec 12 Supplemental Recommendation 20220419 Dear IRT, Thanks for you input on the Addendum II. Based on your feedback, we’ve revised the wording for better clarity of the implementation requirements. 204 Review Revised Addendum II in OneDoc added for Rec 12 Supplemental Recommendation [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1SVFkoI6RmrVVz--RrVLSOj1bmz1qLb7_JTuvt7At4Uo/edit__;!!PtGJab4!oqmhH-KD_GxdmtZYV7Hv_IXbxj6x_H8Ljn-Oy7pcTl1ndXcmp66Q072JIKhbk-4K5g4vYaST$> 20220419 Btw, you’ll note that the next IRT meeting has been rescheduled to next week. We are currently working to revise the Addendum I and the Section 10; again based on your helpful inputs. We’ll need a bit more time to formulate the language and a corresponding logic map to facilitate your review. I’ll send out another IRT task when ready. -- Kind Regards, Dennis S. Chang GDD Programs Director Phone: +1 213 293 7889 Sykpe: dennisSchang www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org> One World – One Internet
Thanks very much, Dennis. I’ve reviewed the various sections of the OneDoc which relate to the Registrant Org field, in comparison with the Recommendations, and I left some comments in the OneDoc which I hope we can address in a meeting soon. To summarize: - section 7.6 tells us that if the Org field is populated it must be published. ❌ - section 10.2.6 tells us that the Org field is only published if the RNH agrees. ✔ These conflict, and 10.2.6 matches the rec (7.6 does not), so I've left a comment on 7.6 saying that it should be subject to the redaction requirements outlined in 10.2.6. Addendum II (look only at the text in the box) says that if the RNH does not consent to publication then "the Registrar MAY apply the requirements described in Section 10.2.2" but 10.2.2 does not speak to the Org field at all. Should this refer to 10.2.6 (Org field redaction)? Thanks, -- Sarah Wyld, CIPP/E Policy & Privacy Manager Pronouns: she/they swyld@tucows.com From: Dennis Chang Sent: April 18, 2022 12:16 PM To: Sarah Wyld; Dennis Chang via IRT.RegDataPolicy Subject: Re: [Ext] RE: [IRT.RegDataPolicy] IRT Task 204 Review RevosedAddendum II inOneDoc added for Rec 12 Supplemental Recommendation 20220419 Hi Sarah, Thanks for the question. You are correct, the text before the box is no longer considered and entirely replaced by the text in the box. I darkened the text to be replaced and commented for clarity. Thanks Dennis Chang From: Sarah Wyld <swyld@tucows.com> Date: Monday, April 18, 2022 at 07:41 To: Dennis Chang <dennis.chang@icann.org>, "Dennis Chang via IRT.RegDataPolicy" <irt.regdatapolicy@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] RE: [IRT.RegDataPolicy] IRT Task 204 Review Revosed Addendum II inOneDoc added for Rec 12 Supplemental Recommendation 20220419 Hi Dennis, Is the text in the box the entire new text, and the text before the box is no longer to be considered? Or does the box replace some of the preceding text? Thanks, -- Sarah Wyld, CIPP/E Policy & Privacy Manager Pronouns: she/they swyld@tucows.com From: Dennis Chang via IRT.RegDataPolicy Sent: April 11, 2022 5:04 PM To: Dennis Chang via IRT.RegDataPolicy Subject: [IRT.RegDataPolicy] IRT Task 204 Review Revosed Addendum II inOneDoc added for Rec 12 Supplemental Recommendation 20220419 Dear IRT, Thanks for you input on the Addendum II. Based on your feedback, we’ve revised the wording for better clarity of the implementation requirements. 204 Review Revised Addendum II in OneDoc added for Rec 12 Supplemental Recommendation [docs.google.com] 20220419 Btw, you’ll note that the next IRT meeting has been rescheduled to next week. We are currently working to revise the Addendum I and the Section 10; again based on your helpful inputs. We’ll need a bit more time to formulate the language and a corresponding logic map to facilitate your review. I’ll send out another IRT task when ready. -- Kind Regards, Dennis S. Chang GDD Programs Director Phone: +1 213 293 7889 Sykpe: dennisSchang www.icann.org One World – One Internet
Thanks very much, Dennis. I’ve reviewed the various sections of the OneDoc which relate to the Registrant Org field, in comparison with the Recommendations, and I left some comments in the OneDoc which I hope we can address in a meeting soon. To summarize: - section 7.6 tells us that if the Org field is populated it must be published. ❌ - section 10.2.6 tells us that the Org field is only published if the RNH agrees. ✔ These conflict, and 10.2.6 matches the rec (7.6 does not), so I've left a comment on 7.6 saying that it should be subject to the redaction requirements outlined in 10.2.6. Addendum II (look only at the text in the box) says that if the RNH does not consent to publication then "the Registrar MAY apply the requirements described in Section 10.2.2" but 10.2.2 does not speak to the Org field at all. Should this refer to 10.2.6 (Org field redaction)? Thanks, -- Sarah Wyld, CIPP/E Policy & Privacy Manager Pronouns: she/they swyld@tucows.com From: Dennis Chang Sent: April 18, 2022 12:16 PM To: Sarah Wyld; Dennis Chang via IRT.RegDataPolicy Subject: Re: [Ext] RE: [IRT.RegDataPolicy] IRT Task 204 Review RevosedAddendum II inOneDoc added for Rec 12 Supplemental Recommendation 20220419 Hi Sarah, Thanks for the question. You are correct, the text before the box is no longer considered and entirely replaced by the text in the box. I darkened the text to be replaced and commented for clarity. Thanks Dennis Chang From: Sarah Wyld <swyld@tucows.com> Date: Monday, April 18, 2022 at 07:41 To: Dennis Chang <dennis.chang@icann.org>, "Dennis Chang via IRT.RegDataPolicy" <irt.regdatapolicy@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] RE: [IRT.RegDataPolicy] IRT Task 204 Review Revosed Addendum II inOneDoc added for Rec 12 Supplemental Recommendation 20220419 Hi Dennis, Is the text in the box the entire new text, and the text before the box is no longer to be considered? Or does the box replace some of the preceding text? Thanks, -- Sarah Wyld, CIPP/E Policy & Privacy Manager Pronouns: she/they swyld@tucows.com From: Dennis Chang via IRT.RegDataPolicy Sent: April 11, 2022 5:04 PM To: Dennis Chang via IRT.RegDataPolicy Subject: [IRT.RegDataPolicy] IRT Task 204 Review Revosed Addendum II inOneDoc added for Rec 12 Supplemental Recommendation 20220419 Dear IRT, Thanks for you input on the Addendum II. Based on your feedback, we’ve revised the wording for better clarity of the implementation requirements. 204 Review Revised Addendum II in OneDoc added for Rec 12 Supplemental Recommendation [docs.google.com] 20220419 Btw, you’ll note that the next IRT meeting has been rescheduled to next week. We are currently working to revise the Addendum I and the Section 10; again based on your helpful inputs. We’ll need a bit more time to formulate the language and a corresponding logic map to facilitate your review. I’ll send out another IRT task when ready. -- Kind Regards, Dennis S. Chang GDD Programs Director Phone: +1 213 293 7889 Sykpe: dennisSchang www.icann.org One World – One Internet
participants (2)
-
Dennis Chang -
Sarah Wyld