I've added this to the agenda for this week's call. It's certainly an important issue for the ISPCP. Tony -----Original Message----- From: owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of KnobenW@telekom.de Sent: 27 May 2012 12:11 To: mike@haven2.com; ispcp@icann.org Subject: AW: [ispcp] ICANN role and remit in security, stability and resiliency -- out for comment -- comments due by 16-June Fully agreed, Mikey, we should weigh in. Do you have some experience with the ICANN statement? I mean we need somebody steering the gang. Should we fix that next Wednesday? Best regards Wolf-Ulrich -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Mike O'Connor Gesendet: Sonntag, 20. Mai 2012 21:17 An: ispcp@icann.org Betreff: [ispcp] ICANN role and remit in security, stability and resiliency -- out for comment -- comments due by 16-June hi all, Patrick Jones just reminded me about this comment period. we may want to weigh in, no? http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/draft-ssr-role-remit-17may12-en. htm i'd be interested in joining the gang of comment-drafters on this one. anybody else interested? mikey - - - - - - - - - phone 651-647-6109 fax 866-280-2356 web http://www.haven2.com handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)