Dear ISPCP member Please see the request below from Kevin Wilson for feedback on the Operating Plan and Budget and in particular the bulleted list of questions in the email. Could you please send comments to me by Monday 27th April AT THE LATEST. I will then compile a formal response from the ISPCP based on your input. Additionally personal input is also welcomed by ICANN. Thank You. Tony _____ From: Kevin Wilson [mailto:kevin.wilson@icann.org] Sent: 18 April 2009 02:07 To: Kevin Wilson; AVRI@ACM.ORG; cgomes@verisign.com; philip.sheppard@aim.be; zahid@jamilandjamil.com; icann@rodenbaugh.com; tonyarholmes@btinternet.com; Metalitz, Steven; robin@ipjustice.org; Jon Nevett (jnevett@networksolutions.com); dmaher@pir.org; Louie@equinox.com; adiel@afrinic.net; junsec@wide.ad.jp; Janis Karklins; Steve Crocker; langdonorr@gmail.com; cheryl@hovtek.com.au; Chris Disspain; Suzanne Woolf Cc: Donna Austin; Denise Michel; Nick Ashton-Hart; Liz Gasster; Olof Nordling; Bart Boswinkel; Dave Piscitello; John L. Crain; Tim Cole; Craig Schwartz; Gabriella Schittek; Glen de Saint Géry; Matthias Langenegger; Doug Brent Subject: Requesting Your Feedback on the FY10 Operating Plan and Budget Dear council, committee, and constituency leaders: A quick note to thank those of you who have held meetings and conference calls on the ICANN FY10 Operating Plan and Budget. We remain available to host more calls with those who would like to discuss and/or provide more feedback. I also want to encourage your members to post comments individually or representing your group to the public comment page: http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#op-budget-fy2010. Close date: April 30. Questions we hope to obtain feedback on are: Is the approach to meetings scaling with the ICANN communitys size and diversity, and work style over time? Should ICANN take action in FY10 to reduce or redirect the substantial expense both directly by ICANN and indirectly by participants in three meetings around the world? As ICANN grows to support application processing for the new gTLD program, what is the best way to staff (hire vs. outsource) and what are the appropriate geographic locations for this effort? How does the community want to explicitly prioritize work such that the costs to support additional work dont just grow? How can ICANN better report on and measure the effectiveness of many activities such as outreach and policy development, so as to allow these areas to be tuned/improved? What other ideas does the community have for prioritization or cost reduction consistent with the Strategic Plan goals? In addition, we want to encourage formal public comments on travel policy/procedures: http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#travel-support-2010. Close date: April 24. Comments for both of these matters will be synthesized into the draft FY10 Operating Plan and Budget to be posted by 17th of May. Your participation is greatly appreciated. Best regards, Kevin Wilson CFO ICANN Kevin.wilson@icann.org