Tony, How about this, including the last sentence? BTW Kurt asked to provide written statements for posting rather than by reading during the session. What's your thinking? Best regards Wolf-Ulrich -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Tonyarholmes@btinternet.com [mailto:tonyarholmes@btinternet.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. März 2011 15:49 An: jillian.mertsch@bt.com; Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich; ispcp@icann.org Betreff: RE: [ispcp] RE: Constituency input to Board/GAC consultations All Adding a brief line to include Jill's comment would seem to be a useful addition. Otherwise this appears complete. Thanks to all who contributed. Tony -----Original Message----- From: owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of jillian.mertsch@bt.com Sent: 16 March 2011 01:20 To: KnobenW@telekom.de; ispcp@icann.org Subject: [ispcp] RE: Constituency input to Board/GAC consultations Elegantly done. I don't have any major changes to offer. However, is it worth adding a line calling for the whole process to be concluded as quickly an efficiently as possible? Best, Jillian (Cocayne) Mertsch VP, US Government Affairs BT Mobile: +1 202 281 4334 ________________________________________ From: owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org [owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of KnobenW@telekom.de [KnobenW@telekom.de] Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 9:03 PM To: ispcp@icann.org Subject: [ispcp] Constituency input to Board/GAC consultations All, Following the ISPCP constituency meeting see attached a draft comment to be delivered tomorrow morning to the public Board session on the applicant guide book. Please provide any comments/amendments you may find useful. Deadline: WEDNESDAY, 08:00 a.m. <<ISPCP comment.doc>> Best regards Wolf-Ulrich