Dear Oliver,
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 17:48:13 +0200 From: <olivier.muron@orange-ftgroup.com>
Regarding the comments coming from JPNIC, I do not agree that "SRSU is out of scope of the current New gTLD process". I do not understand that Recommendation 1(p.19), Recommendations 16 and 19(p.21), in the GNSO report to the Board "Introduction of New Generic Top-Level Domains", exclude single registrant TLDs, and all debates since then prove the contrary.
In response to your point above, I have to say that our point is: GNSO discussion before the GNSO report did not include single ^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ registrant TLDs, so that another policy process should be initiated in order to address this issue. This is completely different from your view point. I think this kind of major modification, or new interpretation of the recommendation afterward is a breach of process. I also would like to point out that Board resolutions 2010.03.12.17 and 2010.03.12.18 in Nairobi for vertical integration/separation issue have same logical structure as our point. Actual meaning of these resolutions are: Vertical integration/separation issue is not included in the GNSO final report, so that another PDP should give an answer for that. Regards, Masa. ---- (Mr.) NaoMASA Maruyama Japan Network Information Center(JPNIC)