All, For your information. Best regards, Osvaldo Enviado desde mi iPhone Inicio del mensaje reenviado: De: "Mason Cole" <mcole@5x5com.com<mailto:mcole@5x5com.com>> Fecha: 28 de octubre de 2013 18:31:17 GMT-2 Para: "Winterfeldt, Brian J." <brian.winterfeldt@kattenlaw.com<mailto:brian.winterfeldt@kattenlaw.com>> Cc: <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Asunto: Re: [council] Fake Renewal Notices Brian -- Many thanks for your question and please forgive my long delay in replying. By way of an update, several registrars have provided me with examples of fake renewal notices, which I have filed. I had hoped to have some legal assistance in crafting a submission to the American and Canadian consumer protection authorities, but have not been able to do so. I am happy to continue with this project (even as I will be leaving the council after the Buenos Aires meeting) -- would you or perhaps another attorney be willing to help put together a submission to consumer protection officials? I would be pleased to finish this project off. Thanks -- Mason On Oct 10, 2013, at 11:49 AM, Winterfeldt, Brian J. wrote: Dear Mason: I have a few questions with respect to fake renewal notices on behalf of the IPC, and I am hopeful you will be able to provide the Council with an update on the matter at your convenience. By way of background, here is what the Council’s pending projects list most recently provided: At its meeting in July, the GNSO Council considered the report of the Fake Renewal Notices DT (seehttp://gnso.icann.org/issues/frn/fake-renewal-notices-updated-report-20jun12...). On the recommendation of the RrSG, a number of alternative approaches are now being pursued to address this issue, including working with ICANN Compliance, reaching out to the relevant local authorities and considering whether it would be appropriate to address this as part of the RAA negotiations. Mason Cole provided a status update by email in February (see http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg14235.html). The Council will consider at its next meeting whether to close this project. And your latest update was as follows: You may recall that the council investigated a PDP but ultimately decided to reserve resources for such a PDP for other work, since the matter could be dealt with more effectively by registrars communicating to relevant law enforcement (particularly in North America). Since that time I have been collecting from registrars examples of fake renewal notices, which I will provide to the attorney that works with our SG -- she will help us submit them to the FTC in the US and other relevant law enforcement and consumer protection agencies. I realize it's been a while since the council has been updated on this, but I want to make sure we have as complete a case as possible when we approach the authorities. I anticipate doing so shortly and will of course update the council when that step is complete. My question is whether the RrSG was able to collect examples for fake renewal notices and provide them to law enforcement agencies, as well as pursue additional efforts on the matter. Was there any report delivered on these efforts? And what specifically has been done to address fake renewal notices or deceptive advertising practices from resellers? We look forward to receiving an update from you on these inquiries. Thank you, Brian Brian J. Winterfeldt Head of Internet Practice Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP 2900 K Street NW, North Tower - Suite 200 / Washington, DC 20007-5118 p / (202) 625-3562 f / (202) 339-8244 brian.winterfeldt@kattenlaw.com<mailto:brian.winterfeldt@kattenlaw.com> / www.kattenlaw.com<http://www.kattenlaw.com/> =========================================================== CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: Pursuant to Regulations Governing Practice Before the Internal Revenue Service, any tax advice contained herein is not intended or written to be used and cannot be used by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer. =========================================================== CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this information may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. Please notify the sender, by electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended recipients and delete the original message without making any copies. =========================================================== NOTIFICATION: Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP is an Illinois limited liability partnership that has elected to be governed by the Illinois Uniform Partnership Act (1997). =========================================================== ________________________________ El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy.