Tony, Thank you for your kind response. Maybe I need to know more context to think this, and Toronto would be the nice place for it. Akinori In message <006401cd964d$5bb8ac50$132a04f0$@btinternet.com> "[ispcp] Impact of new gTLD program" ""tony holmes" <tonyarholmes@btinternet.com>" wrote: | | | All | | Many thanks for your quick response on the draft. The attached version | should contain all proposed changes. Please let me know promptly if I've | missed anything, I intend to send the final version to ICANN today. | | | | Akinori - in answer to the issue you raised; if the proposed Stakeholder | Advisory Platform remained within the GNSO it wouldn't solve the problem as | each group would still discuss common issues within their own domain before | broader discussion occurred. Neither would that reduce the load on the | existing policy development groups. I hope that answers your question. | | | | Regards | | | | Tony | | | |