I fully endorse the need for the ISPs to respond on this. If Masa's compromise is acceptable, fine. Failing that I suggest we revise the statement to omit any comment on this particularly contentious issue. Regards Tony -----Original Message----- From: owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of MARUYAMA Naomasa Sent: 10 August 2010 20:49 To: olivier.muron@orange-ftgroup.com Cc: harris@cabase.org.ar; ispcp@icann.org Subject: Re: [ispcp] Comments on Vertigal Integration Dear Tony and Oliver,
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 18:35:07 +0200 From: <olivier.muron@orange-ftgroup.com>
Dear Tony,
I think that we must come to the conclusion that there is no consensus within ISPCP at this stage.
I suggest that we should work further on the topic to get a common position later in the process.
I appreciate Tony's drafting and I also thank Oliver for his comment while there is some difference of opinion from mine. Since submitting a comment from ISPCP is very importatnt, I would like to propose a compromise. How about replacing the last sentence in the second paragraph to the following? --------------- Again, and with regards to Principle No.3, which calls for the concept of SRSU TLDs to be explored further, there is some feeling in our Constituency that this should be addressed through another PDP. --------------- We have little time left, but I want to make our best. Regards, Masa. ---- (Mr.) NaoMASA Maruyama Japan Network Information Center(JPNIC)