That's a good point. Maybe in the note where Mark attaches the statement, there can be a few bullet points on the strongest of arguments you guys raised at MDP. He is a little worn out today, but wants to hear us out without the background noise from MC and yesterday's larger group. -----Original Message----- From: owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Greg Ruth Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 9:45 AM To: Mark McFadden; ispcp@icann.org Cc: mcf@uwm.edu Subject: Re: [ispcp] A request from the community Mark, I think giving our statement to Vint is a splendid idea. However, if he is looking for facts to support a cogent argument against adopting the current strat plan, namely *why* the strat plan is not a consensus document, someone would have to give him more ammunition than our statement contains. Yes, we went over all that at Mar del Plata, but some memories are short. My $0.02, Greg --- Mark McFadden <mcfadden@21st-century-texts.com> wrote:
All:
Vint Cerf has asked to see out DRAFT statement on the strategic plan. He would like to see it today. I haven't supplied it to him -- prior to getting approval from the constituency.
If you have objections to giving Vint a copy of the DRAFT version of the statement, let me know by 1630 today, Luxembourg time. If I hear objections, I'll forward a reasonable message to Vint.
mark
Mark McFadden 21st Century Texts Madison Wisconsin mcfadden@21st-century-texts.com
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com