FW: [council] Current draft of Fadi's requested communication from council
I'd like to put a short discussion about the letter annexed to the agenda today. Clearly BC and IPC are against sending this letter. There shall be a last try to find a conclusion about. Fadi's deadline is end of Feb. We should settle our position. Regards Wolf-Ulrich -----Original Message----- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:00:47 +0100 Subject: [council] Current draft of Fadi's requested communication from council From: Mason Cole <mcole@5x5com.com> To: "council@gnso.icann.org List" <council@gnso.icann.org> Council colleagues -- As you know, Fadi requested of the council its input regarding the strawman proposal resulting from the BC's and IPC's request for additional RPMs in new gTLDs. On December 27, I circulated an early draft of a council reply. The communication is due very shortly, and has been taken up by a small group within the council to ensure that all points of view are represented. Because this is an agenda item for our meeting this week, at Maria Farrell's helpful suggestion, I'm sending the current draft to council so we can be prepared to discuss it then. This draft does not reflect additional input of the BC and IPC -- if this is provided prior to the meeting, I'll be happy to forward it to the council. Thanks -- Mason
I, personally, support sending this letter as written. Best regards, Osvaldo -----Mensaje original----- De: owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org] En nombre de Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online.de Enviado el: Jueves, 14 de Febrero de 2013 10:10 Para: ispcp@icann.org Asunto: [ispcp] FW: [council] Current draft of Fadi's requested communication from council I'd like to put a short discussion about the letter annexed to the agenda today. Clearly BC and IPC are against sending this letter. There shall be a last try to find a conclusion about. Fadi's deadline is end of Feb. We should settle our position. Regards Wolf-Ulrich -----Original Message----- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:00:47 +0100 Subject: [council] Current draft of Fadi's requested communication from council From: Mason Cole <mcole@5x5com.com> To: "council@gnso.icann.org List" <council@gnso.icann.org> Council colleagues -- As you know, Fadi requested of the council its input regarding the strawman proposal resulting from the BC's and IPC's request for additional RPMs in new gTLDs. On December 27, I circulated an early draft of a council reply. The communication is due very shortly, and has been taken up by a small group within the council to ensure that all points of view are represented. Because this is an agenda item for our meeting this week, at Maria Farrell's helpful suggestion, I'm sending the current draft to council so we can be prepared to discuss it then. This draft does not reflect additional input of the BC and IPC -- if this is provided prior to the meeting, I'll be happy to forward it to the council. Thanks -- Mason El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy.
I do as well. Wolf-Ulrich -----Original Message----- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:22:28 +0100 Subject: RE: [ispcp] FW: [council] Current draft of Fadi's requested communication from council From: "Novoa, Osvaldo" <onovoa@Antel.com.uy> To: "'Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online.de'" <Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online.de>, "ispcp@icann.org" <ispcp@icann.org> I, personally, support sending this letter as written. Best regards, Osvaldo -----Mensaje original----- De: owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org] En nombre de Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online.de Enviado el: Jueves, 14 de Febrero de 2013 10:10 Para: ispcp@icann.org Asunto: [ispcp] FW: [council] Current draft of Fadi's requested communication from council I'd like to put a short discussion about the letter annexed to the agenda today. Clearly BC and IPC are against sending this letter. There shall be a last try to find a conclusion about. Fadi's deadline is end of Feb. We should settle our position. Regards Wolf-Ulrich -----Original Message----- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:00:47 +0100 Subject: [council] Current draft of Fadi's requested communication from council From: Mason Cole <mcole@5x5com.com> To: "council@gnso.icann.org List" <council@gnso.icann.org> Council colleagues -- As you know, Fadi requested of the council its input regarding the strawman proposal resulting from the BC's and IPC's request for additional RPMs in new gTLDs. On December 27, I circulated an early draft of a council reply. The communication is due very shortly, and has been taken up by a small group within the council to ensure that all points of view are represented. Because this is an agenda item for our meeting this week, at Maria Farrell's helpful suggestion, I'm sending the current draft to council so we can be prepared to discuss it then. This draft does not reflect additional input of the BC and IPC -- if this is provided prior to the meeting, I'll be happy to forward it to the council. Thanks -- Mason El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy.
as do i. mikey On Feb 14, 2013, at 6:32 AM, Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online.de wrote:
I do as well.
Wolf-Ulrich
-----Original Message----- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:22:28 +0100 Subject: RE: [ispcp] FW: [council] Current draft of Fadi's requested communication from council From: "Novoa, Osvaldo" <onovoa@Antel.com.uy> To: "'Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online.de'" <Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online.de>, "ispcp@icann.org" <ispcp@icann.org>
I, personally, support sending this letter as written. Best regards, Osvaldo
-----Mensaje original----- De: owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org] En nombre de Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online.de Enviado el: Jueves, 14 de Febrero de 2013 10:10 Para: ispcp@icann.org Asunto: [ispcp] FW: [council] Current draft of Fadi's requested communication from council
I'd like to put a short discussion about the letter annexed to the agenda today.
Clearly BC and IPC are against sending this letter. There shall be a last try to find a conclusion about. Fadi's deadline is end of Feb.
We should settle our position.
Regards
Wolf-Ulrich
-----Original Message----- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:00:47 +0100 Subject: [council] Current draft of Fadi's requested communication from council From: Mason Cole <mcole@5x5com.com> To: "council@gnso.icann.org List" <council@gnso.icann.org>
Council colleagues --
As you know, Fadi requested of the council its input regarding the strawman proposal resulting from the BC's and IPC's request for additional RPMs in new gTLDs. On December 27, I circulated an early draft of a council reply.
The communication is due very shortly, and has been taken up by a small group within the council to ensure that all points of view are represented. Because this is an agenda item for our meeting this week, at Maria Farrell's helpful suggestion, I'm sending the current draft to council so we can be prepared to discuss it then. This draft does not reflect additional input of the BC and IPC -- if this is provided prior to the meeting, I'll be happy to forward it to the council.
Thanks --
Mason
El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información
This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy.
PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)
It's my preference, too. But let's wait for the compromise intended. Wolf-Ulrich -----Original Message----- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:22:28 +0100 Subject: RE: [ispcp] FW: [council] Current draft of Fadi's requested communication from council From: "Novoa, Osvaldo" <onovoa@antel.com.uy> To: "'Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online.de'" <Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online.de>, "ispcp@icann.org" <ispcp@icann.org> I, personally, support sending this letter as written. Best regards, Osvaldo -----Mensaje original----- De: owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org] En nombre de Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online.de Enviado el: Jueves, 14 de Febrero de 2013 10:10 Para: ispcp@icann.org Asunto: [ispcp] FW: [council] Current draft of Fadi's requested communication from council I'd like to put a short discussion about the letter annexed to the agenda today. Clearly BC and IPC are against sending this letter. There shall be a last try to find a conclusion about. Fadi's deadline is end of Feb. We should settle our position. Regards Wolf-Ulrich -----Original Message----- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:00:47 +0100 Subject: [council] Current draft of Fadi's requested communication from council From: Mason Cole <mcole@5x5com.com> To: "council@gnso.icann.org List" <council@gnso.icann.org> Council colleagues -- As you know, Fadi requested of the council its input regarding the strawman proposal resulting from the BC's and IPC's request for additional RPMs in new gTLDs. On December 27, I circulated an early draft of a council reply. The communication is due very shortly, and has been taken up by a small group within the council to ensure that all points of view are represented. Because this is an agenda item for our meeting this week, at Maria Farrell's helpful suggestion, I'm sending the current draft to council so we can be prepared to discuss it then. This draft does not reflect additional input of the BC and IPC -- if this is provided prior to the meeting, I'll be happy to forward it to the council. Thanks -- Mason El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy.
I agree with Wolf-Ulrich. I hope some form of compromise is possible here. It's worth remembering that the ISPs did not agree all items fell in to the 'policy' bucket. Tony -----Original Message----- From: owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online.de Sent: 14 February 2013 13:37 To: Novoa, Osvaldo; ispcp@icann.org Subject: [ispcp] Re: [ispcp] FW: [council] Current draft of Fadi's requested communication from council It's my preference, too. But let's wait for the compromise intended. Wolf-Ulrich -----Original Message----- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:22:28 +0100 Subject: RE: [ispcp] FW: [council] Current draft of Fadi's requested communication from council From: "Novoa, Osvaldo" <onovoa@antel.com.uy> To: "'Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online.de'" <Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online.de>, "ispcp@icann.org" <ispcp@icann.org> I, personally, support sending this letter as written. Best regards, Osvaldo -----Mensaje original----- De: owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org] En nombre de Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online.de Enviado el: Jueves, 14 de Febrero de 2013 10:10 Para: ispcp@icann.org Asunto: [ispcp] FW: [council] Current draft of Fadi's requested communication from council I'd like to put a short discussion about the letter annexed to the agenda today. Clearly BC and IPC are against sending this letter. There shall be a last try to find a conclusion about. Fadi's deadline is end of Feb. We should settle our position. Regards Wolf-Ulrich -----Original Message----- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:00:47 +0100 Subject: [council] Current draft of Fadi's requested communication from council From: Mason Cole <mcole@5x5com.com> To: "council@gnso.icann.org List" <council@gnso.icann.org> Council colleagues -- As you know, Fadi requested of the council its input regarding the strawman proposal resulting from the BC's and IPC's request for additional RPMs in new gTLDs. On December 27, I circulated an early draft of a council reply. The communication is due very shortly, and has been taken up by a small group within the council to ensure that all points of view are represented. Because this is an agenda item for our meeting this week, at Maria Farrell's helpful suggestion, I'm sending the current draft to council so we can be prepared to discuss it then. This draft does not reflect additional input of the BC and IPC -- if this is provided prior to the meeting, I'll be happy to forward it to the council. Thanks -- Mason El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy.
participants (4)
-
Mike O'Connor -
Novoa, Osvaldo -
tony holmes -
Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben＠t-online.de