NEW VERSION - ISPCP Draft Comments on US Government ICANN MoU Inquiry
All: Here is version 1.3 of the ISPCP Response to the Department of Commerce's Request for Comments on the ICANN MoU. Once again, I have attached it in Microsoft Word and PDF formats. Here are the substantial changes in the document: - I have incorporated Greg's suggested text about formalizing the administration of the root servers in section 2.5 (page 4); - I have changed the words "tragic attempt" to misguided attempt" in the discussion of weighted voting in section 2.4; - I have tried to clarify the goal of improving existing relationships with other related Internet organizations in some text in section 2.7; - After Tony's comment, I have removed the text related to the NRO in section 2.2 and 2.4; I'd be very happy to have further comments from the Constituency for a final draft. I'd like to send our comments to Commerce in the next 48 hours so please "Reply All" with comments as soon as you are able. mark Mark McFadden Secretariat ISPCP Constituency
Well, I kinda liked the text on NRO, but I'll go along with the majority. Greg --- Mark McFadden <mcfadden@21st-century-texts.com> wrote:
All:
Here is version 1.3 of the ISPCP Response to the Department of Commerce's Request for Comments on the ICANN MoU. Once again, I have attached it in Microsoft Word and PDF formats.
Here are the substantial changes in the document:
- I have incorporated Greg's suggested text about formalizing the administration of the root servers in section 2.5 (page 4); - I have changed the words "tragic attempt" to misguided attempt" in the discussion of weighted voting in section 2.4; - I have tried to clarify the goal of improving existing relationships with other related Internet organizations in some text in section 2.7; - After Tony's comment, I have removed the text related to the NRO in
section 2.2 and 2.4;
I'd be very happy to have further comments from the Constituency for a final draft. I'd like to send our comments to Commerce in the next 48
hours so please "Reply All" with comments as soon as you are able.
mark
Mark McFadden Secretariat ISPCP Constituency
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Perhaps the text on the NRO was a tragic failure? mark Greg Ruth wrote:
Well, I kinda liked the text on NRO, but I'll go along with the majority.
Greg
--- Mark McFadden <mcfadden@21st-century-texts.com> wrote:
All:
Here is version 1.3 of the ISPCP Response to the Department of Commerce's Request for Comments on the ICANN MoU. Once again, I have attached it in Microsoft Word and PDF formats.
Here are the substantial changes in the document:
- I have incorporated Greg's suggested text about formalizing the administration of the root servers in section 2.5 (page 4); - I have changed the words "tragic attempt" to misguided attempt" in the discussion of weighted voting in section 2.4; - I have tried to clarify the goal of improving existing relationships with other related Internet organizations in some text in section 2.7; - After Tony's comment, I have removed the text related to the NRO in
section 2.2 and 2.4;
I'd be very happy to have further comments from the Constituency for a final draft. I'd like to send our comments to Commerce in the next 48
hours so please "Reply All" with comments as soon as you are able.
mark
Mark McFadden Secretariat ISPCP Constituency
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Dear Mark I like it very much now that details have been changed... Regards Antonio -----Mensagem original----- De: owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-ispcp@gnso.icann.org] Em nome de Mark McFadden Enviada: segunda-feira, 17 de Julho de 2006 14:05 Para: ispcp@icann.org Assunto: [ispcp] NEW VERSION - ISPCP Draft Comments on US Government ICANN MoU Inquiry All: Here is version 1.3 of the ISPCP Response to the Department of Commerce's Request for Comments on the ICANN MoU. Once again, I have attached it in Microsoft Word and PDF formats. Here are the substantial changes in the document: - I have incorporated Greg's suggested text about formalizing the administration of the root servers in section 2.5 (page 4); - I have changed the words "tragic attempt" to misguided attempt" in the discussion of weighted voting in section 2.4; - I have tried to clarify the goal of improving existing relationships with other related Internet organizations in some text in section 2.7; - After Tony's comment, I have removed the text related to the NRO in section 2.2 and 2.4; I'd be very happy to have further comments from the Constituency for a final draft. I'd like to send our comments to Commerce in the next 48 hours so please "Reply All" with comments as soon as you are able. mark Mark McFadden Secretariat ISPCP Constituency
OK with me, thanks Mark. Tony Harris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark McFadden" <mcfadden@21st-century-texts.com> To: <ispcp@icann.org> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 11:04 AM Subject: [ispcp] NEW VERSION - ISPCP Draft Comments on US Government ICANN MoU Inquiry
All:
Here is version 1.3 of the ISPCP Response to the Department of Commerce's Request for Comments on the ICANN MoU. Once again, I have attached it in Microsoft Word and PDF formats.
Here are the substantial changes in the document:
- I have incorporated Greg's suggested text about formalizing the administration of the root servers in section 2.5 (page 4); - I have changed the words "tragic attempt" to misguided attempt" in the discussion of weighted voting in section 2.4; - I have tried to clarify the goal of improving existing relationships with other related Internet organizations in some text in section 2.7; - After Tony's comment, I have removed the text related to the NRO in section 2.2 and 2.4;
I'd be very happy to have further comments from the Constituency for a final draft. I'd like to send our comments to Commerce in the next 48 hours so please "Reply All" with comments as soon as you are able.
mark
Mark McFadden Secretariat ISPCP Constituency
participants (4)
-
Anthony Harris -
ANTÓNIO TAVARES -
Greg Ruth -
Mark McFadden