I think we could support the motion - unless any ISPCP member having Ry/Rr interests is against * "requesting an issues report to evauate whether a minimum baseline of registration abuse provisions should be created for all in scope ICANN agreements". Strong opposition from the contracted parties house can be expected. Any comments? Kind regards Wolf-Ulrich ----- Original Message ----- From: Deutsch, Sarah B <mailto:sarah.b.deutsch@verizon.com> To: wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 10:46 PM Subject: Support for RAP Motion Dear Wolf-Ulrich: On today's BC call, members asked if we could count on the ISCP's support for Zahid's motion to address the remaining registration abuse policies (#5 attached), especially with respect to uniformity of contracts. https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+22+Septe mber+2011 <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+22+Sept ember+2011> Would you all be in position to support this? Thanks and best, Sarah Sarah B. Deutsch Vice President & Associate General Counsel Verizon Communications Phone: 703-351-3044 Fax: 703-351-3670