updated slide deck for today. Edmon
-----Original Message----- From: chinesegp-bounces@icann.org [mailto:chinesegp-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Edmon Chung Sent: Sunday, 20 March 2016 07:52 AM To: hotta@jprs.co.jp Cc: JapaneseGP@icann.org; ChineseGP@icann.org Subject: Re: [ChineseGP] [Japanesegp] scenario consideration
Much thanks Hiro, Not sure if my email (from mobile) got to the mailing lists properly (attached again cause it said my mail was requiring moderation earlier)
Will update the slides 4, 5, 10, 13 and 15.
I did find the character in both JGP and KGP...
JGP: <char cp="9AD4" tag="sc:Hani"> <var cp="9AD4" type="allocatable" comment="identity" /> </char>
KGP: 5857 體 9AD4 體 9AD4 A
I will just use the example for now if that is ok, maybe will find a better example later.
Edmon
-----Original Message----- From: hotta@jprs.co.jp [mailto:hotta@jprs.co.jp] Sent: Saturday, 19 March 2016 21:51 PM To: Edmon Chung <edmon@registry.asia> Cc: ChineseGP@icann.org; JapaneseGP@icann.org Subject: Re: [Japanesegp] scenario consideration
additional comments :
slide15 for RANT, "Sometimes will applyfor multiple" this is true, but I need to confirm that for RANT, I think "Sometimes diffenet RANT want to register a domain name that is a variant of a registered domain name". I hope Yoneya can verify this statement from the SLD.jp registry database.
Hiro
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 16:48:06 +0900 HiroHOTTA <hotta@jprs.co.jp> wrote:
Hi Edmon,
just have seen first slides, but am sending my feeling before going to the flight gate of Haneda.
please give slide# to each slide.
slide4 More elaboration needed for "CNNIC statistics show that 10% of DNS queries are for the IDN variant". Does this mean 10% of .CN DNS queries are for IDNs that have variants? Or, does this mean 10% of IDN.CN queries are for variat IDNs that are not registered in DNS?
slide5 “new character form” and “old character form” recognized as variants should be rewrote as “new character form” and “old character form” recognized as variants in many cases by some Japanese people
slide10 "string similarity" should be more clear in definition , such as "visual similarity" or "meaning similarity" or ...
from slide6 and onward it should be stated that '體' is (not) in J repertoire / K repertoire
slide 13 is the tile #“Conservativeness” in beginning. Can be Relaxed in the Future" is a general statement or (y)our wish ot general purpose or ...
Hiro
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 23:08:16 +0800 "Edmon Chung" <edmon@registry.asia> wrote:
Hi Everyone,
As proposed, please find attached slides attempting to describe possible scenarios to approach Han coordination focusing on the CGP/KGP disparities at this time. This incorporates some suggestions/comments from the CDNC meetings just concluded.
I have not included KGP in the distribution, looking for feedback from JGP and CGP first, or perhaps at our meeting.
Edmon