Dear Mr. Wang: On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 7:14 PM, 王伟 <wangwei@cnic.cn> wrote:
Dear Prof. Kim
Sorry for the late response.
1) For the first question
I think our output is the same, the only difference is the EXCEL format.
4E05 丅 下(4E0B) 下(4E0B)> -> 4E05 is missing
4E05 is not missing in the XML document, we just don't put it in variant column (the 3rd column) when it is the ORIGINAL char (the 1st column)
I see. Thanks. I wonder if you can add them in variant column in the new version of C-LGR so that data in excel format is the same as data in xml format.
2) For the second question
yes, you are right. We made some mistake in the last version. Anyway, China-mainland, Taiwan, Hongkong experts are still confirming what we should treat these IICore chars. We might have a new result by the end of this month.
Thanks very much. Rgds, KIM, K.
Regards
Wang Wei
-----邮件原件----- 发件人: KIM Kyongsok [mailto:gimgs0@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2015年9月17日 13:29 收件人: Wang Wei; chinesegp@icann.org 抄送: JapaneseGP@icann.org; koreanGP@icann.org 主题: [klgp165_31] Possible errors in C-LGR-1 (2015.04.30.)?
Dear Mr Wang and members:
Since the subject of my previous message was confusing (wrong?), I am sending the message again with subject corrected.
Sorry and thanks.
Rgds,
KIM, K.
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: KIM Kyongsok <gimgs0@gmail.com> Date: Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 2:26 PM Subject: Re: 答复: [Japanesegp] 答复: [ChineseGP] K-LGR v0.3 (2015.08.13.) To: 王伟 <wangwei@cnic.cn> Cc: Yoshiro YONEYA <yoshiro.yoneya@jprs.co.jp>, "chinesegp@icann.org" <chinesegp@icann.org>, "JapaneseGP@icann.org" <JapaneseGP@icann.org>, "koreanGP@icann.org" <koreanGP@icann.org>
Dear Mr. Wang Wei:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 2:03 PM, 王伟 <wangwei@cnic.cn> wrote:
Dear Yoneya San
Yes, CGP will update it. We will share it around this weekend.
I will really appreciate if CGP would also review and, if needed, accommodate Korea's review when CGP update C-LGR.
Korea sent its review result on July 16 and the subject of the message was:
[klgp165_31] Possible errors in C-LGR-1 (2015.04.30.).
I am sending the review result once again in this e-mail.
Thanks in advance.
Rgds,
KIM, K.
Regards Wang Wei
from:KIM Kyongsok<gimgs0@gmail.com> to:Wang Wei <wangwei@cnic.cn>, Kenny Huang <huangksh@gmail.com> date:Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:19 PM subject:[klgp165_31] Possible errors in C-LGR-1 (2015.04.30.)? Hi, everybody:
KLGP is reviewing C-LGR-1 (2015.04.30.) and found some possible errors.
1. 618 lines do NOT seem to obey reflexivity (see Appendix 1 for details).
2. In two cases, in addition to reflexivity, there seem symmetry and transitivity issues (problems).
3. Am I missing something? I may be wrong.
I am looking forward to hearing from you. Thanks in advance.
* BTW, this message was sent about 4 weeks ago to CGP cochairs.
Rgds,
-- 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok
-- 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok
-- 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok
-- 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok