Dear all, It seems difficult for us to move without specific proposal on the date/time and venue. Let me narrow down the options regarding CJK meeting. date/time 1st option : 1.5 days during 28/April - 30/April 2nd option : 1.5 days during 15/May - 17/May venue Seoul Either of the above options works for 3 JGP representatives. I hope CGP and KGP can send representatives to either of the above options. Looking forward to your response. Regards, Hiro On Fri, 3 Apr 2015 08:54:17 +0900 Dongman Lee <dlee@cs.kaist.ac.kr> wrote:
Hiro,
First of all, I fully agree with you on having a meeting before the next ICANN meeting. Thanks for a kind and excellent suggestion of Seoul as a meeting location. I will check with KISA.
Regards,
Dongman
?? iPhone?? ??
2015. 4. 3. ?? 12:12 HiroHOTTA <hotta@jprs.co.jp> ??:
Hi, CJK colleagues,
There's a proposal to meet (has a panel) in Macau in June.
However, I think it's definitely better for CJK to meet in late April or early May, which is well before Buenos Aires ICANN Meeting. I proposed that to this mailing list, to propel our discussion.
I haven't heard from anyone from CGP/KGP about my proposal.
I know it's difficult for KGP to join the meeting, so it may be better for CJK to meet in Korea. May I have your opinion on this?
Hiro
On Tue, 24 Mar 2015 06:05:00 +0900 HiroHOTTA <hotta@jprs.co.jp> wrote:
Dear CGP/JGP/KGP members,
Thank you for those of you who could make the informal gathering on March 22 in Dallas happened.
Let me report you about its results as one of the attendees of the gathering.
<report from the gathering>
Three from CGP (including its Chair) and two from JGP (including its Chair) made a sincere in-depth discussion on how to proceed the script-wise LGR generation and the coordination among CJK. Based on JGP's strawman proposal explained as a starter of the gathering, they discussed about the framework, algorithm, and their pros and cons. The proposed framework inherits the concept of Dr. Zhang's definition that was sent to some members of CGP/JGP/KGP including all three GP Chairs on March 10, 2015. The attendees of the gathering there tentatively agreed JGP's proposal with some small improvements.
Following the gathering, the attendees agreed that - CGP would continue working on its revised (reduced) LGR definition (outcome expected to come up in mid-April) - JGP would share its experimental draft LGR with CGP (in a couple of days) for CGP/JGP to ensure that the strawman proposal would work appropriately from technical perspective and from script community perspective. - JGP will work on the improvement of the proposal (in a week)
Of course, CGP and JGP are and will be ready to share their above output among CGP/JGP/KGP after necessary amendment in due course.
<meeting proposal : expected to be agreed in some form>
Now seeing that the informal process in each GP is advancing, I'd like to propose a CGP/JGP/KGP coordination meeting in late April - before mid May at the latest.
May I have opinions on this CJK meeting proposal from CGP/JGP/KGP? Especially about the feasibility, dates, and venue.
Regards, Hiro Hotta, JGP Chair