Hello Hiro-san, thank you for your response. It might be worth considering an alternative: include such scripts, unless there is a documented opposition, based on historical, linguistic or technical factors. In practical terms, it may be useful to draw up a list of characters which present similar problems. This list would be sent out to our membership lists (all C, J, K) for comment within a one-month period. Those characters meeting no opposition could then be included; those presenting a problem would then be either submitted to further examination, or rejected, and the rationale for either decision would be documented. Also, it may be useful to provide a mechanism for periodic review. Best regards, Jean-Jacques. ----- Mail original ----- De: "HiroHOTTA" <hotta@jprs.co.jp> À: "Jean-Jacques Subrenat" <jjs@dyalog.net> Cc: "Joe Zhang" <joezhang43@hotmail.com>, "王?" <wangwei@cnic.cn>, KoreanGP@icann.org, ChineseGP@icann.org, JapaneseGP@icann.org Envoyé: Jeudi 14 Mai 2015 18:38:31 Objet: Re: [Japanesegp] [ChineseGP] 答?: 答?: Characters likely to cause offence I may agree to that in principle. But here I just want to say who should think about that and who is responsible for that? If it's within GP's mandate, GP cannot afford that. If it's within IP's mandate, further question may be 'who can decide some specific characters should not listed in MSR' ? Hiro On Thu, 14 May 2015 11:19:40 +0200 (CEST) "Subrenat, Jean-Jacques" <jjs@dyalog.net> wrote:
Hello All,
the discussion on 卍 and ? must abide by some wider principle. In this case, the principle of historic precedence should be respected: the Sanskrit svastika, which can be traced back at least to the Neolithic, is unquestionably more ancient than any more recent use of this script, or its tragic misuse by the Nazi regime in the first half of the 20th century.
I would therefore urge that we keep the historic Sanskrit script present in the list, insofar as it has been adopted in Chinese, Japanese or Korean usage, for instance in religious or other texts.
To be perfectly clear, by taking this position of respecting the original Sanskrit script, I am in no way condoning the despicable Nazi regime that later employed this as its trademark.
Best regards, Jean-Jacques.
----- Mail original ----- De: "Joe Zhang" <joezhang43@hotmail.com> A: "王?" <wangwei@cnic.cn>, "Yoshiro YONEYA" <yoshiro.yoneya@jprs.co.jp>, "Chris' 'Dillon" <c.dillon@ucl.ac.uk> Cc: ChineseGP@icann.org, KoreanGP@icann.org, JapaneseGP@icann.org Envoye: Mercredi 13 Mai 2015 14:18:33 Objet: [ChineseGP] 答?: 答?: Characters likely to cause offence
Besides卍and ?, there would be many "sensitive" even "dirty" characters in the repertoire. I agree with Wang Wei, let's leave such issue to IP or next working stage. BTW. Sorry for not being able to attend the important meeting. I believe your guys will come up with good result. The best regards,
Zhang
-----?件原件----- ?件人: chinesegp-bounces@icann.org [mailto:chinesegp-bounces@icann.org] 代表 王? ?送??: 2015年5月12日 10:35 收件人: 'Yoshiro YONEYA'; 'Dillon, Chris' 抄送: KoreanGP@icann.org; ChineseGP@icann.org; JapaneseGP@icann.org 主?: [ChineseGP] 答?: Characters likely to cause offence
I guess both of 卍and ? (swastika, ????????) were imported into Chinese characters from ancient India Buddhism hundreds years ago Both of them mean something like luck or fortune in east Asia. Most western people don’t know them until one of them was borrowed by Nazi.
What about leave the problem to IP or policy guys. Let's finish repertoire, variant coordination and generation rules first.
-----?件原件----- ?件人: chinesegp-bounces@icann.org [mailto:chinesegp-bounces@icann.org] 代表 Yoshiro YONEYA ?送??: 2015年5月12日 9:55 收件人: Dillon, Chris 抄送: ChineseGP@icann.org; KoreanGP@icann.org; JapaneseGP@icann.org 主?: Re: [ChineseGP] Characters likely to cause offence
Dear Chris-san,
I suspect there may be other characters in there that could cause offence, but ? 5350 could be horribly abused. I realize that the character it represents is used innocently in temples.
The reason why this character (U+5350) is in J-LGR-2 is that this is defined as variant of U+534D in C-LGR-1. U+534D is in J-LGR-1 repertoire, so it was integrated into J-LGR-2 by proposed integration algorithm.
As you see in J-LGR-2.xlsx, U+5350 is marked as (o) or (b), so it will never appear on Root zone if it is used in applied-for string as Japanese IDN TLD.
Regards,
-- Yoshiro YONEYA <yoshiro.yoneya@jprs.co.jp>
On Mon, 11 May 2015 14:02:14 +0000 "Dillon, Chris" <c.dillon@ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
Dear Yoneya-san,
I mentioned in my last email that one of the things I found in J-LGR-2.xlsx was of a more serious nature.
I suspect there may be other characters in there that could cause offence, but ? 5350 could be horribly abused. I realize that the character it represents is used innocently in temples.
It is not our responsibility to make decisions about cases such as this and as far as I know, no part of the existing system deals with them. However, having observed long discussion over cases such as .xxx and .sucks, alarm bells do go off and one feels one should draw 5350 to the attention of colleagues.
Regards,
Chris. -- Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon
_______________________________________________ ChineseGP mailing list ChineseGP@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/chinesegp
_______________________________________________ ChineseGP mailing list ChineseGP@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/chinesegp _______________________________________________ ChineseGP mailing list ChineseGP@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/chinesegp _______________________________________________ japanesegp mailing list japanesegp@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/japanesegp