Yes. It would be better if there was a comparison between IPv4 and IPv6. But we only have IPv6 traffic. In the initial setting ,there is a same group of probes using TCP as a comparison in case of routing problem or other network failure. But some probes I chose have some bugs sending DNS over TCP at a old version. Do you guys have similar testing or reference of other's work providing quantitative result on this regard? I mean the degree of impact due to large response in IPv6 (or IPv4) network. I'm not sure the result I got (less than 1% misbehave) is a common sense or not. Davey
-----邮件原件----- 发件人: Wessels, Duane [mailto:dwessels@verisign.com] 发送时间: 2017年8月2日 23:16 收件人: Davey Song(宋林健) 抄送: ksk-rollover@icann.org 主题: Re: [ksk-rollover] Observation on Large response issue during Yeti KSK rollover
Thanks Davey,
Just to make sure I understand, these are IPv6-only measurements and results, correct?
DW
On Aug 2, 2017, at 2:31 AM, Davey Song(宋林健) <ljsong@biigroup.cn> wrote:
Hi ICANN KSK rollover team,
For your information, I have an observation on large response impacts during Yeti KSK rollover. Please check the article.
http://yeti-dns.org/yeti/blog/2017/08/02/large-packet-impact-during-yeti-ksk... ollover.html
Best regards, Davey _______________________________________________ ksk-rollover mailing list ksk-rollover@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ksk-rollover