Peter, On Sep 19, 2014, at 12:08 AM, Peter Koch <pk@DENIC.DE> wrote:
I was looking for the "forces” behind this and I read your response as "an ad-hoc group”.
Joe answered this pretty well. Especially the winning smile bit.
At this point, we?re in exploratory mode, primarily focused on understanding the potential issues. Neither a timeline nor a decision making process have been nailed down (as far as I know).
An interesting question - that should not derail any effort on the ops/tech side of things - is which function is in charge. Oversight and such, topic of the month.
For the purposes of the discussion related the implications and effects of key rollover, I don’t think who is in charge/who provides oversight is particularly relevant. When we get to the point of actually changing the key, those questions become more important, but I don’t think we’re there yet (e.g., there are some that argue the key shouldn’t be changed — if that argument wins, questions related to who’s in charge don’t matter). Regards, -drc