On Mar 14, 2019, at 5:58 PM, Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org> wrote:
Personally I would like to see rolls frequent enough that everything around a roll is automated.
I mostly agree. I think the key thing is that key rolls must be *normal* and the software therefore designed with that assumption. For developers to believe that it is normal, it must be "frequent enough", whatever that means. I personally might vote for "quarterly" or "annual" if the implication is only that operators needed to be aware that it was happening in case something breaks, and 2-3 years might actually be OK, but for sure not "every five years". -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, Defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win. Sun Tzu