[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re:??????? = Utf-8 b W2xhYy1kaXNjdXNzLWVuXQnCv0VzIMOpc3Rl = = utf-8 q _Tiresome_ = 27irregularidad = 27_Contra_Large_At-Staff = From: asoto@ibero-americano.org Dear, coarse, bitter and insulting long discussions ended in LACRALO. That's because when someone started, do not answer or answered politely. Alexander, thank you for doing so. Jose Ovidio, the issue of participation is not being tried here because we do not have metrics. Hopefully resolve this soon. Jackeline, the election process is not over yet. Now I want to remind you that last year we Humberto and I, only applicants. We should do vote and accept the result. There were those who voted no, others abstained and others voted yes. The other case was particularly Natalia Enciso, single candidate for ALAC Member. And it was the case that we take as a precedent. Mentioning the case of Sylvia Leite Herlen is not correct, we need not perform election for that office. We pre-meeting with the Staff and after the decision Lance was advised that the vote would be taking as precedent the case of Natalia. The process is ongoing and will end with the vote. best regards Alberto Soto From: lac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: lac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] In the name of Alejandro Pisanty Posted on: Thursday, July 23, 2015 6:53 pm To: LACRALO CC: lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org; Albert Daniels Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Is this Tiresome 'irregularity' Against At-Large Staff Carlton, I'll accept your last use of offensive language.Your message with offensive language will be the subject of work of the Ombudsman. Your vocabulary is translated to unacceptable words in Spanish. The conflict of interest Lance does not come from their own business. The conflict lies in its business representation through the House. Some of these businesses are structural conflcto with users because users are customers of their services. Jacqueline, the expression of interest was modified and expanded after starting the election. Alejandro Pisanty On Thu, July 23, 2015 at 4:46 PM, <carlton.samuels@gmail.com <mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.com> > Wrote: [[Translated text (en -> en) -]] Subject: Re: Is this Tiresome 'irregularity' Against At-Large Staff From: carlton.samuels@gmail.com <mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.com> My friend Alexander, will irritate a little more with rhetoric. Y no please, I accept that I am using the classical sense [English] word. What is alleged is purely unfortunate shit. Lance Hinds ICANN is articulated through a memorandum of understanding with ICANN and caucus with At-Large and LACRALO as representative of DevNet; he is the President and its representative for LACRALO. DEVNET is a nongovernmental organization that provides ICT development services that are on the poor side of the digital divide. DevNet thusly it represents the interests of end users. Think like version DEVNET Guyana Users surfer etc etc. Man is the president of the Georgetown Chamber of Commerce under its owner of a small business; BrainStreet technologies.He derives its income, living wage, especially the business.The fails paid as President of the Georgetown Chamber of Commerce. Here's the problem. It is not unusual for those of us in the Caribbean have many lives; His call to respond to capacity deficit. say that Lanza can not be a businessman and also represent the interests of the end user when he is president of an NGO - the one through which you have connected to ICANN system - just looks delirious for some of us. At least for those of us in the Caribbean who volunteer for one thing or another. -Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels Cell: 876-818-1799 * Strategy, Planning, Government, evaluation and delivery * ============================= Thu, July 23, 2015 at 4:20 pm, Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch < apisan@unam.mx <mailto:apisan@unam.mx> > He wrote:
Carlton,
The issue is very simple. A number of us find an irreconcilable conflict of interest in Lance Hinds's SoI. This is apparent only once the election was in course.
Simple. No rhetoric needed.
Alejandro Pisanty
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Facultad de QuÃmica UNAM Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
+52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
+525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ------------------------------ *Desde:* lac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> [ lac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> ] en nombre de Carlton Samuels [carlton.samuels@gmail.com <mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.com> ] *Enviado el:* jueves, 23 de julio de 2015 16:03 *Hasta:* lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org> *CC:* Albert Daniels *Asunto:* [lac-discuss-en] This Tiresome 'Irregularity' Claim Against At-Large Staff
I am trying to live a long and useful life. Engagement with LACRALO is debilitating.
I am not communicant - I gave it up since I was 14 years old - so cannot depend on a 'good' God for my salvation. So for objective, I do what I must by avoiding vexations to my spirit.
But the bullshit - I hope the word translates well to Spanish - is just too much and I must break my silence.
In case the translation gets mangled, here is what I mean by bullshit:
Definitions of bullshit noun stupid or untrue talk or writing; nonsense. verb talk nonsense to (someone), typically to be misleading or deceptive.
​It is misleading, even dishonest, to allege misconduct by At-Large staff in this instance and I will tell you why.
Jacqueline has already pithily outlined the classic case but I will repeat it here for effect.
In parts of the world where rules for [s]elections are established and where this exercise of democracy is routine, a candidate satisfying all other criteria and nominated for a position unopposed is duly [s]elected. ​
But this is LACRALO where our collective understanding of the process is, well, let me be generous and say uneven, at best.
We simply don't understand that you cannot disavow or subvert the nomination portion of the process without calling the entire [s]election process into question.
So, we walk extra miles to give those who don't understand time to come along, slowly. That is the basis for the consensus poll - notice it is a poll - and why we in the Caribbean bothered to go along with that in the first place!
As At-Large staff would have told all of you, this is not the same for other RALOs. They have matured in both thought and action.
Why does this bother me, you ask? Because it gets old and tiresome after trying for so long. And since it vexes my spirit, I run the real risk of reducing my life and its quality the longer I caucus here.
Now, to the hypocrites. I ask your forgiveness for not being a good Christian. I simply detest hypocrisy.
In the selection for a NomCom candidate this year, our esteemed colleague from Brazil and incumbent, Sylvia Leite Herlein, was nominated unopposed. I enthusiastically supported her candidacy, not just only for the fact she had performed in the post. But I truly believe that a single 1-year term does not give the region the benefit of her service and expertise nor allow the region to build the influence we need in very important ICANN councils.
I personally discouraged - yes, discouraged - other nominations to muddy the path to her re-selection. We went along with Jacqueline Morris being de-selected after a single year. Maybe that was the wrong thing to do then.
With Sylvia's unopposed [s]election, no consensus poll took place. And the At-Large staff notified the world in the same way as they did for Lance Hinds.
It was not that we in the Caribbean did not notice. Rather, it is because we have never felt any such poll was necessary in the first place.
Contrast then to now. There was not a whimper of complaint from our now erstwhile friends of LACRALO propriety, not one allegation of 'impropriety' raised!
So now, I ask you, what is the difference here? We can either assume the guardians of LACRALO propriety were off busily thumb-sucking, even asleep at the switch.
Or, in this case for Lance Hinds nomination and selection, other operating conditions are applied.
Go figure.
-Carlton Samuels
============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* =============================
[[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/482a1728d5.html --]]