[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: RES: Fwd: ALAC Statement on the New gTLDs From: vanda@uol.com.br I think your scan is correct as to be of direct interest communities. The new gTLDs are non any community to enroll in the program. But for large financial companies or interests international, especially for companies in our countries, which failed to win a good space under the dot com, if the opportunity very useful. In the Brazils sells minimally'm getting into this process from the first day. For me the reason because I personally saltbNL> discusin of the group seeking support for communities, it is because ningn was no interest for communities when talking to them for here, clearly - because in fact there. .I welcome the de facto cost of having to pass REDUCTION poor, but non of the many rich of these passes (there is always more rich in many poor passes proportionally than in the passes Many rich), disgusted at the end I do not think it will be useful even this REDUCTION. It you do not have the Economic conditions - as is the case, if the advantage does not Rich goes for these passes - to maintain a registry (either own or contract) is no use having the low entry ticket. Hugs to all ----- Mensagem original ----- From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome Argentina presidency Internauta Posted in: Quarta-Feira 28, 2011 23:04 Dezembro To: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org Assunto: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Fwd: [ALAC-Announce] ALAC Statement on the New gTLDs Alejandro and all: As I heard ad nauseam habrn much you, I am not in favor of new gTLDs. Grounds on which I base my position is that I am convinced that this is just a few and that business is not profitable for most Internet community (including SMEs and end users), we spent a lot of money and time to discuss, write, theorize and Asked about this, so few take advantage of it and one or two search engine companies generate wealth from its massive utilizacin once installed in the markets these NGTLD. Ningn Todava found no citizen or company not engaged in technology, which tells me that it was imperative to have this or that gTLDs again, until you started with creating a field of marketing need not truthful about this, now warm with fear quizs using the flagship brand of your company as gTLDs, appearing estn Some quizs wanting to see that it is able to capture this and before anyone else, he deserves this name ... pear is far from a "Need for users or businesses" and is very close to the need a few, who see in this poqusimos potential ALGN hidden or manifest in other cases large businesses. To you do not pass the same? had another very different experience you describe it? would be good to know ... On the other hand, I understand that I (we) respect everything done by the two ALAC member of the region that preceded me and the work of ALAC on the subject well validebates, time and effort on this. Despus to express what I think I am suffering more than reasonable doubt on the document of ALAC and to vote, is one of the quizs few times that I am in doubt about what to do and the truth is that would be good to hear other voices on this, someone else quizs opine on what it says ALAC and the debate that is taking place in Right now, it would be good also a view favored one of the ALAC Member above who were involved in the issue NGtld. For now I feel I should abstain. The 29 to vote, missing hours for this. Best Regards * Sergio Salinas Porto Internauta Argentina Association President Argentina Internet Users <http://www.internauta.org.ar> -CTA- <http://www.ctamdq.org.ar> Federacin fluid Latin American Users Internet <http://www.fuilain.org> ICANN / LACRALO - ALAC Member facebook: salinasporto twitter: sergiosalinas MSN / YAHOO MSN / Talk: salinasporto ... Skype: Mobi internautaargentina: +54 215 819 9223 5 * * "Ojalpodamos be disobedient, every time we receive orders that humiliate our conscience or violate our common sense "-Edward Galeano * On 12/27/2011 6:23 a.m., Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch escribitbNL> > José, todos,
retomo el tema del voto sobre el borrador de llamado de ALAC en relación
Es de importancia leer los comentarios que otros han vertido en la página
draft, https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/Updated+ALAC+advi gTLDs ce + on +% 29 +% 28DRAFT with contributions from people like Avri Doria.
El contexto actual más amplio viene dado por las voces fundamentalmente de
radically the agreements reached so far and then substantially ms slow the entry of new gTLDs. The New York Times editorializes and talks about a pilot.
Si ven las contribuciones de colegas como Bret Fausett y otros, en Twitter
You can reach the conclusin that voting in favor of the draft ALAC is to deny the history of our organizations for participation in the long gTLDs opening process. Those who have had huge reserves, who have opposed full, and those who have driven have had all opportunities to shape and propose, in particular, more income gTLDs gradual than that envisaged in the program starting at 15 or 20 das.
Pienso por ello que hay que tener argumentos muy claros para hacer un
progress.The can be but should be our arguments, imbued with the long history.
¿Los hay? ¿Cuáles son? ¿Quiénes los expresan?
Alejandro Pisanty
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dr. Alejandro Pisanty UNAM, Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
Tels. +52-(1)-55-5105-6044, +52-(1)-55-5418-3732
*Mi blog/My blog:http://pisanty.blogspot.com *LinkedIn profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty *Unete al grupo UNAM en *Twitter:http://twitter.com/apisanty ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico,http://www.isoc.org Participa en ICANN,http://www.icann.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
________________________________________ Desde:lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org
Arce [josefranciscoarce@gmail.com]
Enviado el: jueves, 22 de diciembre de 2011 15:21 Hasta: Natalia Enciso CC: LACRALO Español Asunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] Fwd: [ALAC-Announce] ALAC Statement on the
*Estimados*: La unica herramienta actual que permite la mejor comunicacion en los dos idiomas es la lista de LACRALO, por tener traduccion instantanea (con sus aciertos y ....). Pero queda abierto el dialogo para propuestas nuevas como la de Sergio para que debatamos si son mejores o no. Mientras tanto y como no queda mucho tiempo para este tema usemos la lista.
Saludos
José Arce.-
2011/12/21 Natalia Enciso<natalia.enciso@gmail.com>
Buenos días:
En la llamada mensual de ALAC del día de ayer se pidió que se discuta en cada RALO sobre el ALAC STATEMENT ON THE NEW GTLDS.
Habrá una llamada de ALAC el 6 de enero de 2012 donde se tratará el tema.
En la lista se estuvo discutiendo sobre el tema, especificamente sobre "interés público". Sería bueno que se genere un debate en la lista para poder llevar la opinion de LACRALO a esa llamada.
Saludos,
Natalia
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: ICANN At-Large Staff<staff@atlarge.icann.org> Date: 2011/12/20 Subject: [ALAC-Announce] ALAC Statement on the New gTLDs To:"alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org" < alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Cc: ICANN At-Large Staff<staff@atlarge.icann.org>
Dear All,
Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, has requested that the Message be Sent to the ALAC Announce mailing list:
Further to today's ALAC call < https://community.icann.org/x/AQrPAQ>, Evan Leibovitch present motion for an ALAC Statement on the New gTLDs, I Encourage you to read-through <
https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/Updated+ALAC+advice+on+gTL Ds
The Statement < https://community.icann.org/x/AYfbAQ> Within Your regional lists.
Additional Information about the Statement Can be found on the Updated ALAC Advice on gTLDs Workspace < https://community.icann.org/x/AYfbAQ>.
Regards,
Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, and Nathalie Peregrine ICANN At-Large Staff E-mail: staff@atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>
_______________________________________________ ALAC-Announce mailing list ALAC-Announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce
At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
- Natalia.enciso @ gmail.com _______________________________________________ Lac-discuss-en mailing list Lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
Http://www.lacralo.org
-- Ab. Arce, Jose Francisco + 54 9 351 6788920 _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-es mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-es mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
[[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/e16b24fa1d.html --]]