Just reading a translation of "The chairman is sticking his neck out..." as "The President estexponindose to fail..." Wow! I think I need to keep quiet. LOL! ROK -----Original Message----- From: asoto@ibero-americano.org Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 12:28 AM To: lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org Cc: lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] =? Iso-8859-1? Q?Examen_Final_-_Miembro_de_la_elec? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Ci =F3n_de_ALAC_ = 28Parte_2 = 29? = [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? Examen_Final_-_Miembro_de_la_elec? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Ci = F3n_de_ALAC_ = 28Parte_2 = 29? = From: asoto@ibero-americano.org Rok, which is the standard estaplicando in that reasoning? Alberto Soto ----- Original Message ----- From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of rok@bango.org.bb Posted on: Friday, August 17, 2012 1:12 a.m. To: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org CC: lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: Final Exam - Member of the choice of ALAC (Part 2) [[- Translated text (in -> en) -]] Subject: Re: Final Exam - Member of the choice of ALAC (Part 2) From: rok@bango.org.bb Carlton, My comprehension of a peticin is that you have a complaint. Then you have to get a certain number of members to agree to peticin support before it is vlida.This depends on many factors that a chair to make a decision that requires members of peticin must be a Decision of serious character, and not a way simplistic and obvious that even decisin required by the President. The President estexponindose to fail and I will not validate executive authority which does not exist. South Korea From: Carlton Samuels Posted on: Thursday, August 16, 2012 23:49 To: Webmaster Cc: Jacqueline Morris lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-is] Final Exam - Member of the choice of ALAC (Part 2) On Thu, August 16, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Webmaster <rok@bango.org.bb> wrote: the President has the right to interpret the rules of carte blanche. We do not accept our President, as if he was the bishop of Rome, infallible in all things. As the presiding officer, the President's chief function is to interpret the rules, but not carte blanche. l is limited by the ROP in the first instance. Aquestlo good. Each member of the other also has a right unqualified to interpret the rules, he said. And since our propsitos, the President is and should be a member in common, all the other members have the right to challenge all and every interpretation of the Presidency. Here's the kicker. Each member has the absolute right to request all other members of their point of view. We call a vote. I say again, if you fell prejudiced by the statement, then is a remedy. Exercise if necessary. - CAS ============================== Carlton Samuels A Mobile: 876-818-1799 Strategy, Planning, Government, Evaluation and deadlines ============================= No virus found in this message. Reviewed By AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2012.0.2197 database / Virus: 2437/5204 - Date Posted: 08/16/12 _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/21c8e44e9d.html --]] _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2012.0.2197 / Virus Database: 2437/5204 - Release Date: 08/16/12