[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: RES: FW: CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Community Priority Evaluation (CPE) Guidelines Update From: sylvia@internautabrasil.org Dear Alejandro: acknowledge receipt of the proposed request for comment on "evaluation of "Communities" around new gTLDs and request LACRALO members to say whether you agree or ESTN against, and enven your comments until Thursday 28 at 23 UTC, as sernecesario gives to incorporate feedback from the community (date Delivery to ALAC - 29/08 23:59 UTC) Aqules leave the link with the historical: https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/At-Large+Community+Priorit and + Evaluation +% 28CPE% 29 + Guidelines + Update + from + ICANN + Workspace (for Spanish speakers, who are english but remember there is a tool down the title that can be used to translate the language of choice "Translate") The original is a pdf document in English. Greetings all, sylvia ___________________________________________________ Sylvia Herlein sylvia@internautabrasil.org Secretary LACRALO-ICANN / 2012-2014 - http://atlarge.icann.org Secretary FLUI 2009-2015 sylvia_leite = Skype ----- Mensagem Original ----- From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch Posted in: Thursday, August 22, 2013 15:20 To: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org Assunto: [lac-discuss-es] Re: [ALAC-Announce] CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Community Priority Evaluation (CPE) Guidelines Update Colleagues, Annex a request for comments from ALAC that merits I answer and community outreach estal LACRALO study and comment. It is the evaluation of "communities" around new gTLDs and has a maturity date of August 29 at midnight (one minute before, in UTC). This issue is of great relevance for the Evaluation and possible aceptacino rejection of proposals for new domain names for some of hese are presented on behalf of a particular community (may be the case some of the proposals. gay and could well be in our region with names like. maya, or the same. Patagonia or. amazon on a new version). In the history of gTLDs are especially a gTLD Pascon Community success but not without controversy. cat tocevaluar me and vote to represent a community of language and culture extended more allde geogrficas borders, and a gTLD controversial and complicated. xxx, for which to make decisions about whether a community well represented previously defined and established or not was one of the most complex. Presentarn surely as these two extreme cases and all points intermediate in the coming months and years. The document submitted to consideracin is a table of criteria for evaluate the accuracy, pre-existence and representation of communities proposed gTLDs behind now, and thus determine its legtimo or better right granted to them gTLDs. Msan in gTLDs competitor (several applicants for the same "string" of characters) these criteria can lead to the selection between contestants. The document was prepared by the Economist Intelligence Unit, associated with the Economist magazine and I think a serious document. The main risk I see if you adopt this document is that disaggregating force criteria and tabulate scores in each of them, can lead to lose sight of the forest for the trees and in the end spend aspermitir Applications really should not. Gladly you compartircon the criteria informaciny experiences mentioned in which I had the opportunity to act as a member the ICANN Board. My proposal, which is a motion formally, is to issue a comment Community reads: "LACRALO supports the adoption of the document by the Economist Intelligence Unit on the Community Priority Evaluation (CPE) in general. Manner additional LACRALO underlines the need for the evaluation of community is integrated to ensure the legitimacy of the applicants and the long-term sustainability of the proposals, without demrito of evolucina flexibility for it over the years. The Community gTLDs history of previous rounds must be consulted and motivate extreme precaution in the analysis ". Request to the Chair and / or secrete to submit this text to regulatory processes, whether ordinary or extraordinary aslo requires calendar ICANN ALAC and to be able to issue if this affirmation sealado pursuant term. Also apply to representatives of ALAC LACRALO assume and carry ALAC's assertion that results from this process of consensus or ballot. Best regards, Alejandro Pisanty --------------------------- Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Faculty of Chemistry UNAM 3000 University Avenue, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD SMS +525541444475 +525541444475 FROM MEXICO Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the LinkedIn group UNAM, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ________________________________________ From: alac-announce-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [Alac-announce-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of ICANN At-Large Staff [staff@atlarge.icann.org] Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 11:20 To: alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: [ALAC-Announce] CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Community Priority Evaluation (CPE) Guidelines Update Dear All, Olivier Crpin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, That have Asked to call for comments be made on the Community Priority Evaluation (CPE) Guidelines Update < https://community.icann.org/x/1wGMAg> Economist Intelligence Unit as well as the draft Statement. Additional information on this statement, can be found on the At-Large Community Priority Evaluation (CPE) Guidelines Update from ICANN Workspace < https://community.icann.org/x/1wGMAg>. Please submit any comments on the workspace using the comments function by 29-August-2013 23:59 UTC. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff@atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/4bde52fb2e.html --]]