[[--Translated text (es -> es)--]] Subject: RES: Public Comment Period "UDRP"! From: vanda@uol.com.br Sorry, forgot the rest. Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados IT Trend Alameda Santos 1470 to 1407.8 01418-903 São Paulo, SP, Brazil Tel + 5511 3266.6253 Mob + 55118181.1464 ----- Mensagem original ----- From: UOL Vanda [mailto: vanda@uol.com.br] Submitted em: quarta-feira, 8 de Junho de 2011 19:44 To: 'José Francisco Arce' Assunto: RES: [lac-discuss-es] Public Comment Period "UDRP"! I certainly I have some positions to divide com you, but I can only do so after the ICANN meeting in Singapore because em I expedited the paperwork involved com nominating committee that is now a priority. But after the meeting I will send my considerations. Thanks and a big hug Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados IT Trend Alameda Santos 1470 to 1407.8 01418-903 São Paulo, SP, Brazil Tel + 5511 3266.6253 Mob + 55118181.1464 ----- Mensagem original ----- From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome Joseph Francisco Arce Posted in: Sunday, May de Junho de 2011 11:08 To: LACRALO Spanish; LACRALO discussion list Assunto: [lac-discuss-es] Public Comment Period "UDRP"! * Dear fellow lacralo *: Previous mail I commenting that had happened in the webinar of the UDRP so important that was. And after a long time opens the possibility of revising policies, with many interests at stake, many players involved and therefore many Internet end-users who will be affected by them. In continuation of this task is to remain open for public comment http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/ # prelim-report-udrp I invite you to join me in the task of being able to produce a document ALAC and hand raise before maturity on July 15. ICANN's staff is seeking comments on its preliminary report of UDRP * Preliminary Issue Report on the Current State of the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy <http://gnso.icann.org/issues/prelim-report-current-state-udrp-27may11 -En.pdf> [PDF, 2.25 MB]. The report describes how the UDRP has addressed the problem of cybersquatting to date, and makes recommendations on whether the GNSO Council should be reviewer of the UDRP. Specifically, this report addresses: 1) How the UDRP has addressed the problem of cybersquatting to date, and gaps or inequalities associated with process. 2) If the definition of cybersquatting inherent in the current language of Uniform policy should be revised or updated. The GNSO is already http://gnso.icann.org/issues/udrp/ working on these issues, and Carlos Aguirre is one of those integrating the working group will looking to develop a PDP on this issue. Those who could not participate in the webinar are able to do to revive in https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoudrpdt/Webinar+on+the+Current+State+ of + the + UDRPteniendo it lasts 2 hours and 25 minutes. What I like is involved someone who will attend the next meeting of ICANN in Singapore since June 22 at 08:30 pm (Singapore) in "Raffles Ballroom" will be held on "The Current State of the UDRP <http://singapore41.icann.org/node/24551> ". For the moment whether there will be no remote participation. Greetings Jose Arce .- _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/3168683d94.html --]]