Much of the focus of the rules outlined here are on metrics and enforcement. That will probably not be a major focus of the Task Force. Regardless, RALOs can generally set their own rules and expectations over and above those set by the ALAC. The major requirements are that they be reasonable given the potential ALS audience, that they are documented clearly, and that they are enforced fairly and uniformly. Alan At 03/08/2015 09:00 AM, Jacqueline Morris wrote:
As you insist, of course this will be passed on as relevant. Unfortunately, it being a working group of ALL RALOs and not just LACRALO, I cannot say that the rest of the group will agree with the LACRALO viewpoint. This is, after all, a WG to create criteria to be applied globally. And of course, I am thrilled that other members of LACRALO will be participating and following the work. Jacqueline On 2 Aug 2015 23:15, <<mailto:jumaropi@yahoo.com>jumaropi@yahoo.com> wrote:
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re: = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - = = UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ????? From: <mailto:jumaropi@yahoo.com>jumaropi@yahoo.com
Alejandro thanks for that reminder. We will be watching. We insist on it. Cordially
Sent from my Huawei Mobile
Alejandro Pisanty <<mailto:apisanty@gmail.com>apisanty@gmail.com> wrote:
Juan Manuel, answered with a copy to the list, because your question is relevant to the community:
June 24 I expressed what I reproduce below. In the course of 24 hours (25 June) we met the consensus of Carlton Samuels, Jacqueline Morris, Sergio Salinas, and several others. Goes:
"Today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief discussion on metrics.
Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group, I think it worthwhile to make clear what the objective metrics.This is well understood in the community, and those who say they do not self-interest to distort the discussion.
What we need is accountability and transparency among ourselves. Individuals and organizations working activametne must be identified. Organizations and individuals that do not contribute or participate must decide whether they will participate or no longer counted. And there's a middle ground and representatives of organizations who find it difficult to participate but have the will to do so. Among these there are many types of situations: a representative who is sick or has to spend time with family or work that sustains; a policy change or mandate; and many more circumstances.
A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable, and difficult to counterfeit.Would make a "triage", ie, would quite clear what organizations 5-10 regularly participate and contribute, the 20 that are practically abandoned, and an intermediate strip of 10 or 15 with which we must work in hopes that recover their participation or leave the organization voluntarily or by way of the decertification. This assumes cycles of renewal of certificates, which must institute.
There is a classification of units that can help us further in this process:
1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities and contribution to substantive policy issues. Their proposals are incorporated in resolutions of LACRALO and impact on policies and ICANN ALAC.
2. sporadic participation and / or dedicated to issues Reglaments procedure formats agreements but not their contents, etc.
3.sporadic, little focus, and fundamentally conducive to "make presence" for elections and selection processes for equity participation in events, especially if they involve support for travel.
Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations should encourage the Type 1, Type 3 disadvantage, and encourage those who make equity type 2 pass to level 1.
If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working Group Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good implementation and their work will be more reliable, predictable and achievable. "
Best regards,
Alejandro Pisanty
08.02.2015 20:28 GMT-05: 00 Juan Manuel Rojas <<mailto:jumaropi@yahoo.com>jumaropi@yahoo.com> :
Thank you Alexander. We take those concerns before. TF. It considered helpful to have clarity on the points that you mean specifically.
Sent from my Huawei Mobile
Alejandro Pisanty <<mailto:apisanty@gmail.com>apisanty@gmail.com> wrote:
Jacqueline, Juan Manuel, all,
The regional point of view has been expressed in the consensus that we out of the meeting in Buenos Aires, with general criteria for ALS reached consensus and are of great strength and general validity.
I hope these guidelines define what they will do our representatives.
Alejandro Pisanty
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 3:12 PM, <<mailto:jam@jacquelinemorris.com>jam@jacquelinemorris.com> wrote:
[[- Translated text (en -> en) -]]
Subject: Re: = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - = = UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ????? From: <mailto:jam@jacquelinemorris.com>jam@jacquelinemorris.com
Thank you. I will do my best to represent the region in the WG. Jacqueline
Jacqueline A. Morris Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, necessary, invisible, Free.(After Chris Lehmann <<http://twitter.com/chrislehmann>http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> )
The Sun, August 2, 2015 at 12:29 PM <<mailto:asoto@ibero-americano.org>asoto@ibero-americano.org> wrote:
[[Translated text (es -> en) -]]
??? Subject: = utf-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - = = Utf-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ????? From: <mailto:asoto@ibero-americano.org>asoto@ibero-americano.org
Dear, on This issue we Have had four nominations. ACCORDING to the above Opportunely criteria, They Have Been selected:
Jacqueline Morris
- Juan Manuel Rojas
We Know That esta WG will have a hard work, and the first meeting will be Tomorrow August 3rd. I will notify Juan Manuel Jacqueline and
schedule the
Meeting.
Best regards
Alberto Soto
--- Avast antivirus software >> esta email scanned for viruses. <Http://www.avast.com>Http://www.avast.com
[[--Original text (es) <http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/99d87e9353.html>http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/99d87e9353.html --]]
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list <mailto:lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org>lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en