One of the troublesome issues regarding the YouTube automated content id removals is the burden is on you to prove otherwise. I sense some in ICANN such as the trademark holders wants this sort of rapid automated UDRP style takedowns. Guilty until proven innocent. A similar situation happened to Ustream who was streaming the Hugo Awards live on the Internet http://io9.com/5940036/how-copyright-enforcement-robots-killed-the-hugo-awar... The EFF has this informative article re: YouTube removals https://www.eff.org/issues/intellectual-property/guide-to-youtube-removals Dev Anand On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@gmail.com> wrote:
..allegedly on ground of 'copyright violation'! Whatever became of the 'fair use' doctrine?
Read the comments. Doubt always, my mantra.
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/09/youtube-flags-democrats-convention-...
- Carlton
============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en