[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: alan question and responses for your evaluation / Alan the questions and answers for ISO-8859-1 B = == = ZXZhbHVhY2nzbg????. From: vanda@uol.com.br Compartindo als ALAN answers to pass on my own entendimeitnos APRA you modify it or concorden Q1 - Do you believe That failing anything else, we must have the Ability to remove parts of or all of the Board? A - I believe yes. Even we expect not use it, The Possibility to Have higher "court" "to appeal is Relevant. A - I understand that. Although it never hope to use this alternative, have a "cut" "more to appeal is very relevant. Q2 - With the exception of Board member removal, do we need legal enforceability of can we rely on good faith (and Board member removal if you supported that). A - I believe on good faith or if we need enforcement, it will never really work. A I believe in good f.Because if we need to make ICANN obrigado do something for a external force, then the alternative would not achieve success all mode. Q3 - If end the CCWG proposal calls for full legal enforceability, is That sufficient reason for the ALAC to not ratify it? A - No, as I answer-on question 2 above, if nothing we need enforcement will be working and whatever is written will never work Either, I Hence it see no reason to create a difficulty due to this issue. A Non, as I contestato in Question 2 above, if an external action is becomes necessary to ensure the exit of the board, then nothing will be funccionando and I estescrito not is relevant, therefore, ALAC no reason to create a problem in this specific case. Best regards, hugs to all Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, 1004 cj 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 Sorry for any typos. [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/fc17f714b5.html --]]