[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] [[--This message had format issues and was not translated properly--]] Subject:Re: Nombre de domiinio geograficos Desde:Adrian Carballo <ainfodata@gmail.com> Dear Alberto, I have some doubts about your message and I kindly ask you if you can help me understand them: - What do you mean by "I want a general opinion"? I do not see another way to have something like that, except through consensus. - about the required times, if you are following the debates in WT5 you will know that there is an open document for comments where I have personally made my contributions.There is still time to make contributions. I suggest that you review the attached documents in the messages of the WT5 list, they have been sent recently for the call of last Wednesday 5 UTC in which I participated from Argentina. - If you are not going to say what is LACRALO's opinion because it should be a "general opinion"? You can make contributions in a personal capacity in the preliminary document that is open to comments, in the list, or in calls every two weeks. I follow all calls and discussions on the WT5 list carefully and have my full support for this important task. regards Adrian On Thu, 6 Sept 2018 at 11:30, Alberto Soto ( <asoto@ibero-americano.org> ) wrote: Adrian, I want the general opinion. A consensus opinion of LACRALO would not arrive in the times that are required. I will not say what is LACRALO's opinion, Thank you Alberto From: Adrian Carballo <ainfodata@gmail.com> Sent on: Thursday, September 6, 2018 10:59 a.m.To: Alberto Soto <asoto@ibero-americano.org> CC: danielaf.araya@gmail.com; LACRALO Spanish <lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org> ; lac-discuss-es@icann.org; Adrian Carballo <ainfodata@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Geographical domain name Dear Alberto, If your idea is to take a position of the region to the WT5 on geographic names, this initiative should be taken to LACRALO and elaborate a consensus opinion from the LACRALO. Olga Cavalli is one of the Chairs of the group and can help us with the state of the debate to date. Best regards, Adrián Carballo President Include me Foundation On Thu, 6 Sept 2018 at 10:48, Alberto Soto ( <asoto@ibero-americano.org> ) wrote: Thanks, Adrian. I know and I know all this because I'm in the work group. My consultation is precisely so that our Region has a greater participation, and my opinion in the working group is based precisely on those opinions. I want to take the opinion of our Region, not my own particular one. regards Alberto Soto From: Adrian Carballo <ainfodata@gmail.com> Sent on: Thursday, September 6, 2018 10:46 a.m.To: Alberto Soto <asoto@ibero-americano.org> CC: danielaf.araya@gmail.com; LACRALO Spanish <lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org> ; lac-discuss-es@icann.org; Adrian Carballo <ainfodata@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Geographical domain name Dear Alberto, If you refer to the new round of gTLDs and reserved names, the issue of defining and protecting names of cities and geographical areas is a topic that is currently under discussion in the WT5 list of the new round of gTLDs. There is no single definition of geographical name and this is precisely the complexity of the subject. For the AGB 2012 (guide of the applicant of the first round of new gtlds) the capital cities of countries were protected and could only be used as a new gTLD with the consent of the city itself (eg: .berlin, .paris). Then in the AGB there are a series of lists of ISO (3166 1 - 2 and others) and of the United Nations with restrictions. One of the current debates about what names of cities to protect would be based on the number of inhabitants each city has, but it is not defined yet. I hope this information will be useful. Best regards, Adrian Carballo President Include me Foundation On Thu, 6 Sept 2018 at 10:40, Alberto Soto ( <asoto@ibero-americano.org> ) wrote: Thanks Daniela. In this case, we must give a general opinion on whether city names are reserved from a certain number of inhabitants, and from what number of inhabitants. For example: all the names of cities that exceed five million inhabitants must be reserved. I repeat, this is just an example. Another opinion may be: No city name should be reserved ... Best regards AlbertoSoto From: Daniela Araya <danielaf.araya@gmail.com> Sent on: Thursday, September 6, 2018 10:31 am To: Alberto Soto <asoto@ibero-americano.org> CC: lac-discuss-es@icann.org; lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Geographical domain name Hello Alberto, to my consideration from Argentina, you should reserve, the names of the different provinces, of regions, such as NOA (North-West-Argentine) WHOSE reference, to the set of several provinces. Greet Atte. Araya Daniela Ageia On September 5, 2018, 2:42 PM, Alberto Soto <asoto@ibero-americano.org> wrote: Dear, I need opinion that the names of cities that have a certain number of inhabitants (still to be determined, but would be an important amount), are considered geographical names, and therefore, are considered reserved domains. I hope your quick collaboration. Best regards Alberto Soto _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http: //www.lacralo. org _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.orghttps://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http://www.lacralo.org http://www.lacralo.org [[--Original text (es) Translated by transbot 2.18-2.04 http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/ca38b8cbd1.html --]]