May 31, 2018
7:02 p.m.
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 11:59:21AM -0500, Carlton Samuels wrote:
2) It appears to rubbish the ICANN Procedures for Handling Conflicts with Privacy Laws by asserting the primacy of local law and the applicability of RAA Sec 3.7.2.
ICANN failed to provide a real use case for the data collected. IMHO that's a consequence of ICANN's attitude, they do not even tried to understand, what's the reasoning of a law. Losing a (low level) case in terms of GDPR by missing to provide "use cases" is simply braindead or arrogance. Let's hope, ICANN can learn quickly.