[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: my comments related the ammendment From: carlosaguirre62@hotmail.com Dear All: Some Personal thoughts: Fatima WAS one of the two or three who Worked very hard to have some our Proposal for GA, try to attack her is to disrespect Against hard-workers in our region, who hit her when to maximum, forgot to Any alternative present Proposal to Improve the previous proposed.I We have to think hard work to do in our GA, Specially Trying to Identify who work seriously, and indentify who only make comments Comments About But without clear Any Proposal. I hope we can show our work together and Possibility to Develop good work. For That, first staff is needed to leave Aspirations and think in the region. God illuminate our actions. Dear All: Some personal reflections: Fátima doso was one of the three that trabajmuy hard to have any nuestraGA proposal, try to attack it is a lack of respect for the strong work in our region, mxime when golpese who olviddepresentar an alternative proposal to improve the previous propuesta.Creo difficult work we do in our General Assembly, in particular trying to identify people who work seriously, and identify that only make comments about the comments, but no proposal clara.Espero we can demonstrate our ability to work together and develop a good job. To do this, you must first leave the personal aspirations and think about the region. God enlighten our actions .. Carlos Dionisio Aguirre NCA GNSO Council - ICANN ALAC former member by LACRALO Lawyer - Specialist in Business Law Sarmiento 71 - 4th. 18 Cordoba - Argentina - * 54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423 http://ar.ageiadensi.org
From: apisan@unam.mx To: carlton.samuels@gmail.com; vanda@uol.com.br Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 20:37:08 +0000 CC: Heidi.Ullrich@icann.org; lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] [lac-discuss-es] my comments related the ammendment
Carlton,
at this hour I think you will show those values much better by putting concrete proposals on the table, new or old.
A esta hora, creo que el apego a esos valores se muestra mucho mejor poniendo sobre la mesa propuestas concretas, nuevas o viejas.
Alejandro Pisanty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dr. Alejandro Pisanty UNAM, Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
Tels. +52-(1)-55-5105-6044, +52-(1)-55-5418-3732
*Mi blog/My blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com *LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty *Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 *Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org Participa en ICANN, http://www.icann.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
________________________________________ Desde: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] en nombre de Carlton Samuels [carlton.samuels@gmail.com] Enviado el: lunes, 05 de marzo de 2012 13:36 Hasta: Vanda UOL CC: Heidi Ullrich; LAC DISCUSS; lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org Asunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] [lac-discuss-en] my comments related the ammendment
Dear Vanda: When I saw the proposal and knowing the background on the so-called WG and the several proposals, I had concluded that what was eventually delivered was thorough cynicism. It was a vexation to the spirit. So I concluded that for me, the optimal response is that I shall be stuck 'mute of malice'.
Seeing your contribution has allowed me the space to change my mind. I too share your general concerns with these proposals. And I support the explanations you have provided in almost all their details, including the remedial suggestions.
Your intervention demonstrates a deep understanding of the values we expect a multistakeholder governance model should project and the means by which that could be achieved.
Best, - Carlton
============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* =============================
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Vanda UOL <vanda@uol.com.br> wrote:
Here my analysis to share with you all related to the proposal amendments. I am not sure due my commit with NOMCOMM if I will will be able to participate in all sessions, so I decided to share my opinions with all of you.
Point I have something to say in highlight below.
Thanks
VANDA
Points proposed by one group
My comments
1) the right of ALSes to vote in LACRALO affairs determined by a minimum level of participation
This is positive
2) working languages expanded to French and Portuguese
I donŽt see need and may be too expensive. But this is not a main concern. ( but I donŽt see APRALO working in the more than 20 languages they have there
3) removes the concept of operating by consensus
From my point of view this is against one of ICANNŽs principle build consensus
4) creation of Vice President
Those persons cannot be added to the normal representation at ALAC without the decision of ALAC itself. Not for LACRALO to decide. See also below on item 8
5) terms of President and Vice President eligible for two terms of 2 years each
This make some sense, since representation in ALAC demands some degree of learning, so one year is short term indeed. But the second term shall be one year to allow others to participate.
6) creation of Vice Secretariat position
Same of vice president
7) LACRALO would elect 2 persons to serve on ALAC and 2 others as their
respective alternates (diversity requirements shall not apply to elected ALAC member and their alternate).
I disagree - diversity shall apply. The principles of ICANN states on diversity. The concentration of persons from just one country for instance, is not democratic neither safe for the organization. ( imagine if the two big countries Mexico and Brazil decide to make a strong movement to take over this group, can be control all the positions) really not safe. Must have diversity.
8) The alternate or deputy can assume the ALAC rep in case of any inability of the primary ALAC rep
I believe this shall be submitted to ALAC, We cannot decide next time the member sent to ALAC meeting is another
9) the ALAC member can be re-elected for a 2nd two year term
Reelection has the same principle 1 year for second term to allow others to participate.
10) creation of a LACRALO Directory or LACRALO Board with administrative and operative functions. This will comprise the persons elected in LACRALO (President, Vice-President, Secretary, Deputy Secretary, the two LACRALO elected representatives to ALAC and their alternates) and five Policy Directors who would lead different working groups within LACRALO and in charge of selecting members within their working groups. Policy Directors would be elected by the General Assembly by simple majority.
In my opinion this will mean too much generals and no troops to command but no impact at all.
3 would be good one member of Caribbean region and two from Latin region too keep diversity and at same time be reasonable ( there is no much members that really works in LACRALO so I donŽt believe it will be groups enough to work under 5 policy directors). But not so relevant
11) establishing that elections can take place virtually
This is good, but needs clear tools must be available to avoid one member to vote for all the ALSs under its command - only allow this after check the security of the tool.
12) amendments would be applicable to existing mandates of President, Secretary
I am not in favor of that, only if was to have just one more year term.
Application of the change in benefice of the existing elected members looks manipulation.
Same people can be candidate and be elected, but extending the mandate, looks not democratic. ThatŽs the way ditactors use to keeping in place Totally against.
13) The constitution of the Board of LACRALO be held after the first election to be held immediately at the time of these amendments be approved.
Not so relevant.
Vanda Scartezini
Acesse: http://nomcom.icann.org e candidate-se!
Access: http://nomcom.icann.org and apply!
Polo Consultores Associados
IT Trend
Alameda Santos 1470 conj. 1407
01418-903 São Paulo,SP, Brasil
Tel + 5511 3266.6253
Mob + 55118181.1464
Dissemine esta idéia:
Digite o dominio ao inves do telefone.
Domain dialing
Descrição: Descrição: Siter-16-square.png <http://www.siter.com> www.siter.com
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-es mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
[[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/83b08dd49a.html --]]