ESTIMADOS, NO TENGO NINGUNA DUDA, el statement de CHERYL DEBE SER APOYADO Y CONTINUAR DISCUTIENDO TEMAS DE POLICY. Copio el contenido aquí, saludos Andrés Piazza Presidente de LACRALO --------------------- http://www.atlarge.icann.org/files/atlarge/alac-travel-policy-for-volunteers... ALAC and At-Large Travel Support Requirements Response of the ALAC to the Public Consultation on a Revised Travel Support Procedure for Volunteers This document has been translated from English in order to reach a wider audience. While the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) has made efforts to verify the accuracy of the translation, English is the working language of ICANN and the English original of this document is the only official and authoritative text. You may find the English original at: Page 1 of 3 Introductory Note By the Staff of ICANN This statement is the outcome of discussions of the ALAC and the Regional At-Large Organisations during the At-Large Summit that were then compiled by ALAC Member Alan Greenberg into a draft text. That draft was transmitted to the ALAC and the regional leaders for comments on 18th March. Alan then incorporated comments received, and this draft circulated to the public ALAC mailing list on 23rd March. This draft was then introduced for decision at the ALAC meeting of 24th March, where it was approved by consensus. The Chair of the ALAC, Cheryl Langdon-Orr, transmitted it to the public consultation forum on 16th April 2009. [End of Introduction] Page 2 of 3 ALAC and At-Large Travel Requirements The Past Prior to FY09 (July 2008 – June 2009), ICANN supported ALAC/At-Large Travel as follows: A. 15 ALAC members at ICANN meetings (5 Nominating Committee appointees (NCA) and 10 selected by RALOs or before their existence, by the Board). B. 2 Liaisons at ICANN meetings. C. Once RALOs existed, 1-2 RALO leadership positions, typically the Chair and/or the Secretariat. The average number per meeting stabilized at about 7 per ICANN meeting. D. Once RALOs began forming, about 15 representatives of ALSs from within the region where the meeting was held. E. As RALOs were being formed, and to a lesser extent afterwards, there were regional meetings at times other than ICANN meetings to which regional ALS representatives were funded. For FY09, the ALAC waived D and E to be replaced by the At-Large Summit. In the formal August-08 Travel Procedure for FY09, the “current situation” (that is, preceding FY09) mentioned only A and ignored all other previously supported travel. Ultimately, items B and C were reinstated on a meeting-by-meeting basis, ostensibly due to the short notice of the formal withdrawal of such funding and due to the need to plan for the Summit. In the Procedure, Liaisons were described as being funded by the receiving organization, but that was later changed to being funded by the sending organization. Moreover, at the Paris meeting, the Board passed a resolution saying that starting in FY10 (beginning in July 2009), the ALAC would receive funding on a level similar to Supporting Organizations under the Travel Procedure, which was widely interpreted as being the chair and NCAs, plus 50% of the remaining members. To go from A+B+C+D+E to roughly 2/3 of A has been described by some as having the having the budget “slashed”. However, it must be noted that this reduction is inferred from previous staff statements and Board actions and has never been explicitly stated as official policy. The Future ICANN has made and is making a very sizable investment in ALAC and At-Large. The At-Large Summit in Mexico City, coupled with recent ALAC involvement in a number of GNSO and ICANN activities and the generally optimistic ALAC independent review process indicate that this investment is paying off. By its very nature, ALAC and At-large represents users and not those with vested financial interest in the business of the Internet. Very few active members of the ALAC community are employed with ICANN-related issues in their job descriptions, and virtually none are in a position to have employers partially or completely fund travel to ICANN. In fact, for many, even the ongoing levels of activity are often undertaken as personal activities without time-off being given by employers. If ICANN should follow-through on not funding travel for some ALAC members, it is virtually certain that most or all would not be able to attend ICANN meetings. This would significantly threaten the ability of ALAC to function, and would likely prompt at least some of the other members (including NCAs) to resign due to the lack of a critical mass at meetings. Page 3 of 3 Moreover, it would be a false saving not to fund RALO leadership attendance at ICANN meetings. These are the key people in the regions who must motivate and act as liaisons to their ALSs. It is critical that these people be fully involved in the ICANN organization. Lastly, the At-Large Summit was widely praised as being both successful and indicative of the promise of At-Large. Although such a massive undertaking is not envisioned again in the immediate future, it seems wise to maintain some level of activity and contact. To this end, it is suggested that one General Assembly per RALO (with an average of 15 ALSs each) be funded on a regular basis. These could be during ICANN meetings when the venue makes this possible for the region where the meeting is held, or otherwise shorter meetings held in-region. Logistics It is very important that ALAC members, at the very least, be housed in the same hotel used by the majority of other ICANN Supporting Organizations and Committees. The opportunities that this provides for interaction between ALAC members and the rest of the ICANN community cannot be overestimated and is felt to be crucial for ensuring that ALAC becomes a truly integrated part of the ICANN family. Similarly, for those ALAC members who are interested, it is essential that travel procedures enable them to be present during the entire ICANN meeting (including the Board meeting) and that for long trips (perhaps over 15-18 hours) they be allowed to arrive sufficiently early so as to be awake and productive during their first meetings. The need for making travel arrangements well in advance for both cost and visa reasons, and the need for developing working per-diem distribution mechanisms have been discussed ad infinitum in Mexico City, and are being mentioned here solely to reinforce their importance. We expect that you will be receiving a number of private statements attempting to delineate specific air travel requirements. The ALAC is very supportive of clear procedures and transparent exception processes allowing the use of reasonable economy airfares which maximize the volunteer traveler’s comfort and benefits. We ask for flexibility to ensure that volunteers can make their journeys to and from ICANN meetings in reasonable comfort and be able to function efficiently while on ICANN business and to recover quickly on their return home. ALAC has made previous statements on travel issues which are still applicable – see https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?al_alac_bud_sc_0308_1_1. Please note comments on travel support in the At-Large Summit Declaration – see http://www.atlarge.icann.org/files/atlarge/correspondence- 05mar09-en.pdf Summary ALAC requests ICANN travel funding at roughly the level that it was prior to FY09. Specifically: • 15 ALAC members at each ICANN meeting; • 2 Bylaw-mandated Liaisons; • 8 RALO leadership positions at each ICANN meeting (recent changes in the European RALO imply that they will now have 2 leadership positions instead of 1); • 5 regional General Assemblies per year (1 per region), to be held during an ICANN meeting if appropriate. Airfares will be lower due the regional nature, and non-ICANN meetings will be much shorter. • Flexibility in providing economy class airfares which maximize the volunteer traveler’s comfort and benefits.
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:46:23 -0700 From: admin@ttcsweb.org To: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org CC: Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] hoy teleconferencing
[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]
Tema: Re: hoy teleconferencing De: admin@ttcsweb.org
Cheryl Langdon-Orr fijó una declaración posible re: RecorridoEn-Grande Ayuda en las guías de consulta de la ayuda del recorrido de lacomunidad que podría LACRALO ayuda:
Mensaje Original Tema: Re: [ ALAC ] Consulta pública sobre la comunidad del bosquejo TravelGuidelines para FY2010: Redactor Voluntario De la Declaración Necesitado Fecha: Thu, El 11 De Junio 2009 10:46:55 De +1000 De: Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@gmail.com> : alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org, personal En-Grande <staff@atlarge.icann.org> Referencias: <4A2F1028.2070402@atlarge.icann.org>
Porqué no lo haga apenas ponemos algo como esto adentro como declaración con la ayuda específica de RALO y de ALS enumeró esperanza de I... .. El ALAC desea hacer claramente el siguiente en la conexión con procedimientos propuestos del recorrido para FY2010:
En este bosquejo, se sugiere que cualquier arranques de cinta de RALO pueden atender a cada uno de las tres reuniones de ICANN, o del financiamiento para esas10 personas puede estar utilizaban a Asambleas Generales para el En-Grande regional Organizaciones ("RALOs") a través del año.
El ALAC * (y éste es donde podríamos enumerar literalmente RALO y ALS ayuda) * debe reiterar nuestras puntas anteriores que éste noes situación de "either/or". Ha habido una ventaja muy clara al RALO dirección que assiste a reuniones de ICANN sobre muchos niveles. En el mismo tiempo, a la ocasión para que cada RALO resuelva cara a cara cada año está también de enorme ventaja.
Entendemos que hay muchas comunidades en ICANN que requieran ayuda del recorrido. Mientras que en un mundo ideal, sería posible para cada uno del RALOs para atender a un ICANN que resuelve cada año, entendemos ese ideal no es siempre posible. Por lo tanto creemos que el RALO El gas se podía llevar a cabo conjuntamente con reuniones regionales existentes relacionado al Internet sostenido cada año, sobre un día o dos, guardar costes abajo mientras que se asegura de que cada región tenga la reunión cara a cara esencial necesita, porque todas las razones enumeradas previamente en nuestro vario declaraciones sobre este tema sobre el curso del separador de millares del *(could del tiempo... conexiones a las declaraciones anteriores aquí también) *
CLO
Extremo del mensaje original
sylvia@internautabrasil.org escribió: > [ [ - - texto traducido (es - >)--]] del en > > > tema: hoy teleconferencing > de: sylvia@internautabrasil.org > > compañeros queridos de LACRALO: > > el 4/06 del personal de Icann enviado un mensaje a nosotros en la nueva política de > viajes que incluirán en el período fiscal próximo de ICANN, de modo que > comentemos hacia fuera respecto a ella. > > y 10/06 nos envió un nuevo mensaje ayer que invitaban a nosotros para pensar encendido > bosquejo áspero del plan y del presupuesto operativos FY10,de que que el newone incluye > política de viajes. > > > > hoy, habrá un teleconferencing, con el servicio de la traducción en paradas españolas > para ocuparse de estos temas. > > es muy importante que participamos todos desde este "politica nuevo de > los viajes "afectan en forma negativa la participación del ALSs y el suyo > representantes. > > si observan en pag 7 > > http://www.icann.org/en/topics/tra! vel-support/draft-travel-support-guideline > s-27may09-en.pdf > > él se intenta para ordenar reuniones regionales y eso el ALSs no participa adentro > las reuniones "normales" de ICANN para bajar el precio de costes, puesto que usted es > las reuniones tendrían una agenda mucho más pequeña y durarían 1 o 2 días. > > soliciing siempre que la comunidad En-Grande participa y da el suyo > la opinión en los temas GTL nuevo, IPV6, DNS, pero no admitirá que participamos > de los talleres y/o de las conferencias, de que en el alwaysare de estos temas hecho > en el encuentro de ICANN > ¡> será hoy el teleconferencing y en el willbe de Sydney allí un discusión público! > > no podemos seguir cerrados para arriba, yo esperamos sus comentarios. > > saludos, > > Sylvia Herlein Leite > > Internaut Del Brasil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ [ - - texto original (es) > http://mm2.icann.org/transbot_archive/bc65e46324.html > --]] > > > > _______________________________________________ > lista que envía laca-discutir-lac-discuss-en > lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en_atlarge-lists...
_______________________________________________
[[--Original text (en) http://mm2.icann.org/transbot_archive/b53a9f0e82.html --]]
_________________________________________________________________ Windows Live Hotmail now works up to 70% faster. http://windowslive.com/Explore/Hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_faster_...