[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re:??? = Utf-8 La_evoluci q = C3 = 83 = C2 = 2E0 == B3n_de_ICANN_3 = utf-8 _-_Innovaciones_para_m q = C3 = 83 = C2 = utf-BAltiples_partes_interes ==? 8? q? adas_Modelo? = From: asoto@ibero-americano.org So Carlton. Are discussions that generate other discussions, but they must be faced as a structural complex. It is true that one issues is our own struggle to inclusion and a more participatory model LACRALO. But as for all structural complex, there are issues and taking measures to be going simultaneously to enable the final structure is found to be adequate. Another big topic, as seen in this "summary" sent, is the amount, complexity, and technical and political implications that we must consider. I think the way we work, is the active participation in internal working groups LACRALO, and also in the other groups of ICANN. But so far I see a real initial enthusiasm and numerous entries in all these groups, but results in most cases are unsatisfactory. Innovations needed should begin at home. Perhaps the working groups should be small with programs defined scope and timelines, and fulfill. Maybe take some work methodology. Maybe we should just join us on those issues that really dominate. Maybe work more despite dissent opinions. Maybe sacrificing a few hours (a few hours ...) to achieve the objectives set. Perhaps several perhaps more The innovation to the future of ICANN and governance Inernet is in us, with what we do in and out of LACRALO for it. Best Regards Alberto Soto ----- Original Message ----- From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of carlton.samuels @ gmail.com Posted on: Thursday, December 12, 2013 3:06 pm To: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Fwd: The evolution of ICANN ³ n 3.0 - Innovations for multiple stakeholders Model [[- Translated text (en -> en) -]] Subject: Fwd: The evolution of ICANN ³ n 3.0 - Innovations for multiple stakeholders Model From: carlton.samuels @ gmail.com Some discussions on the evolution of ICANN below that of multiple stakeholders Innovation Panel ³ n. The ideas that come-crowd and captured comment can be helpful to our own struggle with inclusià ³ n and s more participatory model for LACRALO. -Carlton ============================== A Carlton Samuels Mà ³ vil: 876-818-1799 * Strategy Planning n, Government, Evaluation and Turnaround * ============================= -------------------------------------------------- ------ Brainstorming begins: Initial Ideas Evolving ICANN - Posted on December 9, 2013 - By Jillian Raines <http://thegovlab.org/author/jillian/> - In GovLab Blog <http://thegovlab.org/blog/> , Mà s Smart Governance <http://thegovlab.org/smarter-governance-2/> [Image: Screen Shot 09/12/2013 to 6.41.19 PM] <http://images.thegovlab.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Screen-Shot...> The Strategy Group on Multi-Sectoral Innovation ICANN ³ n (MSI Panel) < https://www.icann.org/en/about/planning/strategic-engagement/multistakeholde...> this is course work to preserve a set of concrete proposals for the way the Internet Corporacià ³ n for n ³ Assigning Names and numbers (ICANN <http://www.icann.org/> ) could create prototypes of new institutional arrangements for the 21st century.The The panel is working to identify ³ mo comfortable ICANN can open up to more overall s Participation in governance functions. Specifically, the MSI Group is responsible for: - Suggest new models of international implication ³ n, consensus-driven FORMULATION ³ n of Policies & Institutional structures to support such enhanced functions, and - Project Processes, tools and platforms that enable the global ICANN community to participate in these new forms of participatory decision-making. To help answer this letter, the MSI Group threw a 'Idea Generation n "or ideacià ³ n platform <http://thegovlab.org/wiki/Ideation> , ± ado designed to brainstorm with global public about comfortable ³ mo how ICANN will evolve could operate given innovations in governance <http://thegovlab.org/wiki/Main_Page> passing Trava © s of world. * We are now 3 weeks in this stage * n Generation of ideas - that take place online Security: * thegovlab.ideascale.com <http://bit.ly/1dS9sLp> * - And We wanted share with you what the Panel and GovLab has heard so far in relationship with ³ n © qua tools, technologies, platforms and techniques tà © ICANN could learn from or adapt to help design ± ar an innovative approach to the resolution of problems within the domain name system in the future. These initial ideas begin to paint a picture of the 21st century coordinacià ³ n a n overall common good could involve shared. These brainstorming all point to certain principles bà musicians provide the Panel finds basis for n ³ institution to legally operate in the global pà º blico © s interest today. These principles are: - * Opening * - Warranty of open channels, as well as very low or no barriers to meaningful participation ³ n. - * Transparency * - pà º blico facilitate access to the information and data deliberation ³ n. - * Accessibility * - simple and readable Organizational Development communications. - * Inclusiveness and lack of domination ³ n * - Ensuring access to global Participation and no one player, entity or interest © s dominates processes or outcomes. - * Disclaimer * - The creation of mechanisms for global pà º blico to check institutional power. - * Efficiency * - Improve decision making Trava © s of greater reliance evidence and a focus on flexibility and agility. - * Efficiency * - Racionalizacià ³ n processes to best leverage, resources and human capital. With these principles as musicians bà ³ n fabric line, the ideas we've heard so far more or less fall into the following catagories: The creation of new forms and more effective s Global Participation * ICANN could. . . * - Leverage networking tools * Expert * (as VIVO <http://www.vivoweb.org/> ) proactively find experts working groups with the necessary know-how and will decide what should be accomplished and comfortable ³ mo. This expandirÃa the participation pool n s beyond more traditional suspects. - Use tools * open-minded rain (like IdeaScale <http://ideascale.com/> ) for people inside and outside the structures of existing ICANN to raise issues and problems by topic online and to allow comment, vote and ranking of importance. - Make all projects subject to proofreading by n * open * pairs (as used in FREE <http://liberatingresearch.org/> ) as a way to involve more people in the s ³ n verificacià of proposed solution ³ n and ³ n identification of possible outcomes and / or unintended consequences of ICANN decisions on the global Internet community early on. - Use the drawing tools of collaboration n * (as a wiki <http://www.wikipedia.org/> ) issue reports and develop final recommendations to the Board of ICANN consider this n open to input from people / organizations at all ICANN structures and more s beyond. Innovating organizational processes, structures and rules to Support jurÃdicas ³ Participation in new and meaningful collaboration n and n * ICANN could. . . * - Use * based on a model-based themes \\ u200b \\ u200ben the mà © rite * working group to develop solutions to problems (for example, as utilized by the Internet Engineering Task <http://www.ietf.org/wg/> ), Beachfront model based on ³ n circunscripcià currently in use in the ICANN. - Create a policy of open data ** by ICANN to facilitate easy access, exchange and reutilizacià ³ n of ICANN data in open formats readable by machine. This would increase transparency, facilitate the creation of new services and allow research opportunities and Evaluation ³ n ³ n, inside and outside of ICANN. - Use StratML <http://xml.fido.gov/stratml/> * - An XML vocabulary - for easily share, referenciacià ³ n, n ³ indexaciÃ, discovery, reutilizacià ³ n, the vinculacià ³ n, and Ana lysis of strategy documents and vision. - Write and publish all contracts ICANN from open and consistent data ndares is aligned with international contratacià ³ n open * <http://www.open-contracting.org/> * Standards. - In an effort to change the reputation of the ICANN of a complex, n acronym organization dead a simple, accessible and legible 21st century organization ³ n - s * post more "plain England © s reports" * (eg annual, monthly digest report, dashboards, infografÃas) to communicate work and achievements within, across © s and outside the structures. - Develop a repository of online tools * and * Cua them are their uses / purposes they are. Enable peer-Evaluation ³ n on the set of tools that various groups within the community could classify utility tools' for different sites PROPA ³. - Leverage * other * multisectoral forum to discuss issues and ICANN increase the investment in ICANN decision-making (eg Internet Governance Forum (IGF <http://www.intgovforum.org/> ), The Internet Society (ISOC <http://www.internetsociety.org/> )). - Create an arm * Research Research ICANN ³ n * o * sessions cuestià ³ n-framing early school * to serve as a mechanism for identifying better and be more savvy about the potential s polÃticas implications of ICANN decisions, and anticipate issues and formulate in all structures of ICANN before the development of the solution ³ n. - Use by preference * vote to elect members of the Board of ICANN. This could give people the opportunity to communicate a say s more extensive than is Trava © s possible for a single person, the system Voting Booth ³ n à º nica. - Use a tà © technique with * A liquid Democracy <http://liquidfeedback.org/> * A create a model of choice ³ n more s Dina mico, giving people the option of vote on a particular topic or delegate their vote to a trusted party. - As an alternative to the call for volunteer work groups, * sponsor a paid ** bug bounty program <http://arstechnica.com/security/2013/11/now-theres-a-bug-bounty-program-for-...> * for descentralizacià ³ n of the discovery process safety issues in the DNS that are within the control of ICANN. The development of interest © s audience of more © tric to review decisions * ICANN could. . . * - Create an ICANN Research Research ³ n * arm * to serve as a cross-community resource in to provide an objective investigation, based on evidence regarding the politics / landscape tà © technician, legal, social, Econa ³ mica and politics in ICANN operates and to help measure the impact and success of the à © ICANN development initiatives and polÃticas. Introduction to the Education ³ n and resources to reduce barriers to the participation n * ICANN could. . . * - Establish a Foundation ³ n * ICANN * to report to the public at large global on emerging Internet governance, as well as issues and their impacts uses. - Establish an open course * in * n ³ Education Online of ICANN platform <http://learn.icann.org/> around multistakeholderism it means, how it works and its ability to remain Nimble as the Internet expands. But these ideas are only the beginning. * What key © would work? How to Do you? * As we begin rated and transform à © hese from disparate ideas into a constellation of workable proposals, the Panel needs your help. The design ± or global, participatory decision-making at Borders Trava © s global demands seem entry. Also © n we aim to ensure that people with concrete ideas know how participate in this brainstorming <http://bit.ly/1dS9sLp> . While the site is ± ado designed to be easy to use - we understand the complexity of ICANN may deter some.You do not have to! Any idea of \u200b\u200bmaking new decisions and innovative processes and structures or examples are welcome. The platform is designed ± ada collect and vet all sorts of ideas for innovation of government - either constitutional, structural, legal, procedural or logical technologic. If there are any additional obstacles for brainstorming, please hà I know ganoslo at * icannmsipanel@thegovlab.org <icannmsipanel@thegovlab.org> *. We want make sure we capture what works and what does not work as we try to be more ready to s s more intelligent government in ICANN. [Image: Share] <http://www.addtoany.com/share_save> [Image: Share] <http://www.addtoany.com/share_save> * Labels * # WeCANN <http://thegovlab.org/tag/wecann/> . Expertise <http://thegovlab.org/tag/expertise/> .ICANN <http://thegovlab.org/tag/icann/> . Internet governance <http://thegovlab.org/tag/internet-governance/> . Living labs <http://thegovlab.org/tag/living-labs/> About Jillian Raines View all posts by Jillian Raines â † ' <http://thegovlab.org/author/jillian/> â † Age of Democracy <http://thegovlab.org/the-age-of-democracy/> Resea ± to the book: Three harbingers of change â † ' <http://thegovlab.org/book-review-three-harbingers-of-change/> Leave a comment _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/e89c619bc4.html --]]