[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: RES: Voting Candidate NomCom - Staff Appreciation - Proposal From: sylvia@internautabrasil.org Dear Jose and members of the region I, as secretary was the one who Tomla solicital decisiny staff that organize the ballot. And the reasons were: 1) We had a conference call the same day in which we should send our advice to ALAC, so solicital an extension of the deadline Staff in 48h (which was quickly requested and approved by the President of ALAC for June 28 at 13 UTC) 2) it had several technical problems with two of the candidates did what they could not express their ideas, and a great number of questions from the community that could not be answered. 3) our monthly conference June 17, is hablde change the system, but also because it is aclarque limit to date This time was very close and tendramos not time to consult the community and get consensus, these changes will The nearest applied to elections. For all the above and to the term of the term and the absence the president of the region, I was in the obligation of taking the decision to habamos continue as always done and not innovating at the last minute. In other words, determine the preferred candidate for the region and send that information with the rest of the nominees for the ALAC take your decision! Regards, Sylvia ___________________________________________________ Sylvia Herlein <mailto:sylvia@internautabrasil.org> sylvia@internautabrasil.org Secretary LACRALO-ICANN / 2012-2014 - <http://atlarge.icann.org/> http://atlarge.icann.org Secretary FLUI 2009-2013 sylvia_leite = Skype Descrio: Assinatura_Sylvia_Internautabrasil From: JosFrancisco Arce [mailto: josefranciscoarce@gmail.com] Posted in: Wednesdays, June 26, 2013 21:45 To: LACRALO Spanish; Silvia Vivanco, At-Large Staff; sylvia @ prontocl Assunto: Voting Candidate NomCom - Staff Appreciation - Proposal Dear, First I want to apologize for not being able to participate yesterday's call. I had some major drawbacks. But now I have read the emails and I received personal emails and want to clarify the picture: 1) On the day of yesterday took the desicion to go to a vote, personally do not take it and not know who took it. If want to tell that I am in against such desicion by several reasons.One of them is that the desicion to take the region and should been taken yesterday during the teleconference. Another is that the deadlines are due and must be respectful of them when we can, and I think this is a case of them. 2) Due to the events and I intend to suspend the voting and send ALAC the list of candidates, and here the justification: a) If the region wants to go to vote, as there are disagreements, and no consensus, first should be voted if the majority wants to go to cavitation or not, and if he wins if recently there go to vote. You know that our region should work by consensus and if not get it we must be respectful of all positions. b) Our region is not required to specify the preferred candidate. Anyway, each of you can express in the wiki, where everyone, including ALAC can see those apoyos.c) I think is the solution that reconcile the interests of all and we'd be respecting deadlines and ALAC could see the support for the candidates in the wiki. I send warm greetings Jose Arce. [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/a4c64c7ce6.html --]]