[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject:? = Iso-8859-1 q = M == 3A_Comentarios E9tricas_de_ALAC = iso-8859-1 q = _solicitados??? From: fatimacambronero@gmail.com Dear, Maureen Hilyard APRALO and member of WG metrics are ALAC comunictbNL> solicitarme me to comment on a model of self-evaluation that estproponiendo is for members of ALAC, in compliance with metrics in which esttrabajando. This model of self-evaluation that estproponiendo, estbasado a number of comments received from different RALOs. I'm not part of WG metrics, in this case I'm working with the request by Maureen. Perhaps LACRALO members are members of this WG or even Sergio committed to act as LACRALO link between WG and metrics, will be able to report on progress of this WG. In the link below and under the title * 2. Suggested Assessment Method: Self Evaluation by ALAC members, * is this model self-evaluation on which comments, ideas estsolicitando is, criticisms, proposals for improvement. This is the link to the Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/ALAC+METRICS+-+FEEDBACK+PLEASE Because right now the comments do not Travs Wiki ESTN running, podrn send their comments directly to Maureen ( hilyard@oyster.net.ck) or in this thread to be collected and sent to her. At the end of this email podrn find the comments I sent Maureen I attulo staff. Thank you very much. Best Regards, Fatima Cambronero - First, if each member of ALAC will complete this table, you can happen that one who does not really honest to complete.Quin will control what is estcompletando fit reality? Not sure if it was a consensus that each member of ALAC should Auto-complete this table. If it was, from my point of view is not It is a good idea. We must remember that this is a voluntary role, the which we are already carrying a bunch of metrics. If in addition to all force them to complete this month this table, is a burden excessive for a volunteer job and besides that we risk does not conform to reality. Also there will be a mtrica for ALAC member who does not complete this table? In addition in this table only the date that is estingresando existila teleconference, no concrete estexplicando qutarea is done in such teleconference. I understand that participation in the conference is only criteria for measuring participation. And all activities a previous member of ALAC performed before attending the call?By example, read documents, organize the agenda, communicate privately with WG members for comments or ask warn that such call you are going to ask for a report of its activities, etc. All this should be measured tambine included in this evaluation? In this table a temple on "Tasks 2014" is included. I consider this not is appropriate because the tasks in the working groups for example are not always the same throughout the whole year. In any case MUST be separated by WG in which they participate and within it, the tasks concrete that develops in the WG per month. This will allow a better developed specific monitoring activities. Add a task GenRich for all year, from my point of view is no indicator for measure participation. - - * Fatima * Cambronero Attorney-Argentina Phone: +54 9351 5282 668 Twitter: @ facambronero Skype: fatima.cambronero * Join the LACRALO / ICANN discussions: * https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es * Join the Diplo Internet Governance Community discussions: * http://www.diplointernetgovernance.org/ * Join to the Internet Society (ISOC): * http://www.internetsociety.org/ _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/0615b53f07.html --]]