[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re:??????? Q = iso-8859-1 FAblico_24 Cerraerdo_comentario_p = = = iso-8859-1 -MAR-17_de q = Desde: asoto@ibero-americano.org Dear Olivier, thank you again. LACRALO struggled to leave their comment on these forms, and apparently there were several with the same problem. Envi ended imagine Harold Ndolo mail. I also n I using that to v. I called the care that on an issue like this, this process is used: fixed form (with problems) and mail. And the p PUBLIC commenting does not have access to other comments, nor made in the form or mailed It's very weird.... Best regards Alberto Soto -----Original message----- From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of ocl@gih.com Posted on: Thursday, March 23, 2017 7:38 a.m. To: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: Closed comment p PUBLIC 24-MAR-17 [[Translated text (in -> en) -]] Subject: Re: Closed comment p PUBLIC 24-MAR-17 From: ocl@gih.com Dear Alberto, ALS and At-Large members are Alent to respond directly to the consultation by electronic mail to: comments-atlarge-review-draft-report-01feb17@icann.org L date limit for direct comments on March 24, 2017 23:59 GMT But the ALAC and RALO leaders l n prepar also obtained comments Consensus discussions. Drafts of these comments have been And circulated. The comment THIN taken directly input all particularly the work of the working group and can LACRALO RALOS found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DZLG-xM-WbyhI9LqAkS3pGZwvDjBI10h0xxYp5Ch OPA / edit? Usp = sharing The Declaration by ALAC \\ u200b \\ is elabor u200bcon several applications input community and its last draft is attached. I understand that now both states is frozen n - that is completed, unless someone wing a factual error. ALS are encouraged to support the ALAC and RALO statements, but Tambi n are encouraged to comment directly at the email above, using or not using the template. Best regards, Olivier On 23/03/2017 2:09, asoto@ibero-americano.org wrote:
Estimates, as everyone knows, on 24 March 2017, close the comments p venues around the reviewedSeptember n At-Large ITEMS by the
There were two papers entries, the first draft pages and ninety p then containing the recommendations is sixteen.
The view favored this latter, it is obviously very limited without power review the first draft.
Since the beginning many members of the WG, we made observations on that draft, which served to comment on the document contains recommendations is sixteen.
LACRALO har its inset n on these recommendations, according to what is They come off the WG, and were informed promptly to the list.
As recommended that each ALS or ALS pour each member of your OPINION n in the commentary p PUBLIC few minutes ago I tried. Actually Be prepared to personal comments on both documents.
My surprise when entering the link was that can only opinarse to a trav s form the view favored only limited to comments, and restricted to a format for review comment for comment.
This means that the initial draft document, which I believe contains several shortcomings and misguided claims not directly investigated in fact, it is not feasible to be observed or can be poured VIEW n on it.
We must remember that ning n p PUBLIC comment was restricted to a form, and less an no possibility of opinion on the document He gave rise to that form.
Unfortunately it is too late, this PERIOD already closed.Try the way making a general comment, not particularly about each RECOMMENDATION No, because I think it is an important limitation n our freedom of opinion.
The link in question: <
lic-comment-input-template-01feb17-en.pdf>
ic-comment-input-template-01feb17-en.pdf
http://www.gih.com/ocl.html [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/9611c6d953.html --]]