Yeah, that was the explanation given in the story; an automated system that went berserk. What they failed to acknowledge is that some human hand had to do something to set the attributes the platform enabled to assess the content! Hence my admonition: Doubt, always! - CAS ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Dev Anand Teelucksingh <devtee@gmail.com>wrote:
One of the troublesome issues regarding the YouTube automated content id removals is the burden is on you to prove otherwise. I sense some in ICANN such as the trademark holders wants this sort of rapid automated UDRP style takedowns. Guilty until proven innocent.
A similar situation happened to Ustream who was streaming the Hugo Awards live on the Internet
http://io9.com/5940036/how-copyright-enforcement-robots-killed-the-hugo-awar...
The EFF has this informative article re: YouTube removals https://www.eff.org/issues/intellectual-property/guide-to-youtube-removals
Dev Anand
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@gmail.com> wrote:
..allegedly on ground of 'copyright violation'! Whatever became of the 'fair use' doctrine?
Read the comments. Doubt always, my mantra.
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/09/youtube-flags-democrats-convention-...
- Carlton
============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en