[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Answers to Questions from: asoto@ibero-americano.org I just published my answers to Alejandro and Vanda on the wiki. I copy my answers below. Best regards Alberto Soto I was hoping the wiki open to answer. Alejandro questions Pisanty What are the main priorities of LACRALO to be carried A THE C? What is your management project for ALAC? Resolve the issue of integration of our region, dating back many years. It was very specifically raised at the meeting of Dublin with the presence of LACRALO; ALAC and ICANN. This process takes an excessive delay on the part of ICANN and ALAC; They have already passed seven months since its inception.The information we had in March (Marrakech) is the same that gave me the month of January. That work with the bottom-up methodology. This means that should Ralo work internally, achieve active participation and upload policies. I believe that this requires that point 1 is completed. Of all the urgency to advance the same That the independence of the Ralos respected. We had several samples interference in our Ralo, who had request from LACRALO, but did not-resolution. They are the cause of unnecessary conflicts and do not allow progress on issues that Ralo considered substantive. No mo take a particular project, that will surpass the leaders of Reginya our members. I bring those generated in our THIN and push forward with a positive interaction between our Ralo and ALAC. But I think the hiring of the company ITEMS International to conduct the review process as a At-Large independent examiner, allow me to collaborate with each of our ALSs in the process.And I think certainly there will be changes substantial in the management of ALAC and At-Large. Mention carry full force items proposed by our Regin, either ALAC or its working groups. To this we must participate in groups ALAC work, ICANN and Cross Community. This requires dedication in number of very important weekly hours. Not only at meetings but necessary in preparation prior. And I can devote. All witness of this for years. The previous year I had until 9 meetings weekly in very different times. Some of them under two hours, but more duracinan. What are the main strengths and weaknesses of current LACRALO ALAC representatives think and how leverage and equal or overcome the strengths and weaknesses replace? I do not think it is time for this type of analysis. I think I can try to act taking the principal of each. He judgment and patience Len, particularly in critical situations and conflict.Particularly as Vice-Chair of the Cross Community Working IANA Transition Group and Accountability aora in the same group for the implementacin stage of approvals in Marrakech. This has been highlighted ALAC several times, particularly by the CEO of ICANN meetings ALAC. The opportunity Vanda intervention in several areas, demonstrating a deep knowledge of them. It has always been very concrete, going to the heart of the cuestin, showing that has made a deep analysis before issuing opinion. The dedication of Harold who is making up with her, her little experience Initial development of a meeting. But it had all the knowledge necessary. From the beginning I had an active participation. Another important factor for a good desempeo, is not comment without the knowledge necessary. Will be representing our Ralo and can not be fail or make ridiculous.It regards the necessary knowledge in the last three years and a half before having an obligation, not only had participation in a monthly meeting of ALAC. Also participated in the great Most of their webinars. And in all meetings of LACRALO, except one, for many years. what is its mastery of English in relation to the needs of LACRALO have an effective representation in ALAC? This question - and if possible the above - must be answered in English. Actually, I do not like orders, in particular that should be. My english level is medium, but I understand and I understand. A sample of it was more that two observations made at two different meetings with the CEO of ICANN were taken by the Board of ICANN l. For two years I came to participate in face meetings, telefnicas and I work in WG only in English. In particular, as zither above face meetings with the CEO of ICANN, who never traducciny had at dinner parties where reunaa the leaders.Very particularly in these dinners, where it was absolutely mandatory speak, since the witness chair to chair spent. I must admit that in the dinner was more diverrtido. qu history of your recent activity in the community of the LACRALO prepared to effectively represent the community and resolve matters of "policy" that sta formula? Since the year 2005 participated in ICANN. For many years as representative of my ALS. Always actively participated in LACRALO WG, of ICANN ALAC and Cross Community. I currently participate in the Public-Interest-WG and the CCWG Accountability in Implementacin stage. I think I have taken the necessary knowledge about the ecosystem of ICANN, particularly on the interests of end users, to resolve issues of policy. Cit and my active participation in working groups, webinars, etc. It is the way of taking knowledge to to act retrospectively. qu commitments of participation, communication, transparency and rendicin accountability to the community acquired?how hese can be monitored, and claimed in his case? I am committed to always. I had and have a wide participation, and very active. This means that I think, and better than that, my view is always well considered. It is particularly my intervention at meetings ALAC monthly, where I have not had a vote, but my voice was always welcome. For communication, I assume the commitment to the leadership of LACRALO all topics addressed and which may be cause for more later participation of RALOS. As AFIRM before, this procedure has to allow time to prepare RALO that issue, and if necessary, Additional capacitacin use. Accountabilities. You can make a monthly or bimonthly report, but to be interpreted, it is necessary that members of the Ralo have the Thematic knowledge in question to not only learn, but retroalimentacin engage with that permits improvement in desempeo of the function. Surveillance, claim and accountability, I think it should be part of legislation is absent. There are things done but not yet approval and modification. This email has-been protected by YAC (Yet Another Cleaner) http://www.yac.mx [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/ca0e01daa6.html --]]