[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: =? Windows-1252? Q? Fwd = 3A_Declaraci = F3n_sobre_la_E? == Windows-1252? Q? Strategia_Reuni = F3n_de_ICANN? = From: apisan@unam.mx Hello, I think that the proposal presented by Natalia Declaration and Fátima provides a good balance between opposites for efficiency in the organization of meetings, which also is in favor of the participants, and the Histórico mandate of ICANN to be near the communities in its diversity geogrfica. Additionally it has the benefit of being realistic about that we have not been prepared to bid reuniny sufficient sites creates the right incentive to do so by eliminating the automatic asignacin regions in the multi-year cycle of meetings. As, joint criteria we have expressed Vanda and I, with other members of the community who have also been expressed by colleagues in Africa in recent conversations (in the IGF in Bakentre other). So I spoke in favor of this proposal. Cordial greetings. Alejandro Pisanty ! ! ! !! NEW PHONE NUMBER - NUMBER OF NEW phone +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD FROM +525541444475 Mexico SMS +525541444475 Dr. Alejandro Pisanty UNAM, 3000 University Avenue, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the group on LinkedIn UNAM, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ________________________________________ From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of Fatima Cambronero [fatimacambronero@gmail.com] Posted on: Thursday, November 15, 2012 9:29 To: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org CC: LACRALO discussion list Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Fwd: Declaration on ICANN Reunin Strategy Dear, Regarding the proposed consolidation of Strategy Meetings ICANN is open for comment until da audience of tomorrow (November 16 at 23:59 UTC), with Natalia Enciso we have developed the following Declaration (estcopiada below) that we refer to it consideracin. In this Declaration we have considered the various comments been some LACRALO members on our list and in addition the Declaration drafted by Tijani AFRALO. We have talked to our President LACRALO, JosArce, and as we time is short, we kindly ask that you please review this declaraciny make their comments throughout the day today, donkeys is given in the morning time to pass it to include it as inglse Comment LACRALO audience to name. Also because of the shortness of time, I want to ask for Please if estn not agree with any part of the text, proposed the Text redaccin preferring instead, since comments general will take to be developed and included. Thank you very much. Best regards, Fatima Cambronero * Declaration of LACRALO on Consolidacin Strategy Proposal ICANN Meeting * LACRALO understands the difficulties that the staff responsible for the estteniendo ICANN meetings to find suitable places for ICANN global meetings in some regions, especially since the community has grown in scope tamaoy last time. Rate efforts to revise the current selection system. However considers that it is the right time to do so considering that is open a process of revision of the Framework Regions ICANN Geogrficas where the criterion of division of ICANN regions may be considerably modified depending on the outcome of this process. Also, considering the speech of the new CEO of ICANN, Fadi Chehaden Toronto, one objective of the ICANN estenfocado internationalization of the organization. Therefore, the lack of rotation equitable regional strategy proposed in this consolidation of Meetings will be attacking this central objective of the new Gestin. In the current system of selection of meeting venues the rotation regional respected equally, because each one year and a half meetings are held approximately in the region of Latin America ' Caribbean. With the proposed strategy Consolidacin, meetings the region were held every three years affected the equity in the rotation regional, as members of the local community must wait ms time to have a chance to participate personally in these meetings. This is a very long life cycle taking into account that mandates of key officers of our region have a Duracin one and two years. This form of equal rotation among regions not impact the actual participation of the users and members of the ALS of the region of Caribbean and Latin America ', in the necessary interaction that must exist in pblicas ICANN meetings between community members and Board, affecting the transparency that should guide these meetings. Also hampered the effective participation in meetings pblicas of those individuals and organizations that need to attend financed by their own means, as all years are must travel cities and remote regions, and hence more costly, than the hometowns. Also consider important to emphasize that in most of the countries of Amrica America and Caribbean visa is not required for admission. This should be considered an advantage alongside countries like United States and Canada, and Reason for this not to be denied our region passes the possibility to host ICANN meetings, only three years. Also consider important to include other possible negative impact of the Proposed consolidation of Strategy Meetings and is referred to ICANN Fellowship Program. One of the most important criteria and has been responsible for the success of this program is based on the geogrfica diversity of its participants and its proximity on the venues of the meetings.This has allowed the program has been enriched with participants from all regions of ICANN participating in meetings fairly Through his years of life. With the proposed consolidated affect the possibility of fellows from the region from Latin America and the Caribbean are selected to participate in the program, having to wait three years for have the opportunity to be part of ICANN ly that meets the Outreach and empowerment that are part of their objectives. LACRALO estconvencido that an equal rotation between regions is important to meet the functional diversity and cultural geogrfica Internet enshrined in the ICANN Bylaws. Therefore, to comply one consider equitable regional rotation to be followed using selection system meeting current branches and that in the case of touch to a region that does not have options of venues that meet ICANN requirements needed to host a meeting, you must move to the region next in the meeting schedule stipulated.The region in cuestin, lose the turn this time, and must wait to ensure compliance with the cycle of the five regions, in order to re- apply. Thus, the criterion is respected regional diversity equitably. We consider also necessary to revisit this criteria once approved the framework for geographic regions be adjusted to the new regional reality. 2012/11/15 <carlton.samuels@gmail.com>
[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]
Asunto: Re: Fwd: Declaración sobre la Estrategia Reunión de ICANN De: carlton.samuels@gmail.com
Estoy totalmente de aprobar todos estos comentarios. El proporcionar lejos y más evidencia de mi posición como enviado.
- Carlton
============================== Carlton Samuels A Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y Turnaround * =============================
El Miércoles, 14 de noviembre 2012 a las 1:34 PM, Natalia Enciso < natalia.enciso@gmail.com> escribió:
(these are notes from the papers, icann bylaws etc, that can be used as a base for the statement if You all considered it appropiately)
Today the ICANN meeting serves the following purposes: Engages local communities in various regions on issues affecting them (outreach). ICANN needs to do more to encourage outreach and involvement from the global community. Taking one meeting every 3 year in LAC wont help achieving this goal, all the contrary. They are an important foundation of the ICANN multi-stakeholder model.
It reinforces ICANNs global character it increases and widens participation from different countries.
Icann bylaws. Section 2 core values. 4. Seeking and supporting broad, informed participation reflecting the functional, geographic, and cultural diversity of the Internet at all levels of policy development and decision-making.possible.
Section 3. NON-DISCRIMINATORY TREATMENT
ICANN shall not apply its standards, policies, procedures, or practices inequitably or single out any particular party for disparate treatment unless justified by substantial and reasonable cause, such as the promotion of effective competition.
Fellowship: adding to What Dev said, The Fellowship program is designed toward ensuring geographic diversity and to include representatives from multiple ICANN regions. Following the New strategic plan would diminish LAC possibility to apply.
And, Fadi in his Torontos speech emphasized about the New internalization of Icann. Taking Icann to the Community and not the Other way a round.
http://www.icann.org/en/news/press/kits/toronto45/video-chehade-15oct12-en.h...
Looking forward for your comments,
Natalia
Enviado desde mi iPad
El 14/11/2012, a las 15:04, Dev Anand Teelucksingh <devtee@gmail.com> escribió:
Perhaps this point could be made by a separate LACRALO statement:
According to the ICANN Fellowship page at http://www.icann.org/en/about/participate/fellowships , Fellowships are awarded based on a mix of criteria including geographic proximity to meetings. Thus, more fellowships are awarded to persons in the geographic region of the ICANN meeting.
With the proposed Consolidated Meeting Strategy impacting when ICANN meetings are held in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) and Africa,
this
"geographic proximity to meetings" criterion for the award of ICANN fellowships for the meetings in Europe and Asia/Pacific from 2014-2016 should be adjusted to allow for more fellowships from persons in Africa and the LAC regions.
Kind Regards,
Dev Anand
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Carlton Samuels < carlton.samuels@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Natalia: There has been a change in the original plan for a joint AFRALO/LACRALO statement.
Tijani held the pen on the draft ALAC statement. And so ensured the AFRALO perspective is adequately covered. Their main concern was about visa for African attendees.
If we think LACRALO issues are not properly addressed, we could add to that draft ALAC statement.
Best, - Carlton
============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* =============================
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Natalia Enciso < natalia.enciso@gmail.com
wrote:
I agree to have a joint statement. But do we still have time? The vote announce have been made. Nati
2012/11/13 Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@gmail.com>
Recall the AFRALO Leadership proposed a joint AFRALO/LACRALO Statement.
Is there any interest? - Carlton
============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
=============================
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <alac-announce-request@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Date: Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 7:00 AM Subject: ALAC-Announce Digest, Vol 52, Issue 5 To: alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org
VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the ICANN Consolidated Meetings Strategy Proposal (At-Large Staff)
Message: 1 Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 11:23:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "At-Large Staff" <staff@atlarge.icann.org> Subject: [ALAC-Announce] VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the
Dear All,
Olivier Cr?pin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, has asked that a vote be
held
by the ALAC on the proposed "ALAC Statement on the ICANN Consolidated Meetings Strategy Proposal<https://community.icann.org/x/_5MoAg>" for communication to the relevant parties.
***** Question: Do you support the ratification of the "ALAC Statement on the ICANN Consolidated Meetings Strategy Proposal< https://community.icann.org/x/_5MoAg>" for communication to the relevant parties? *****
Additional information on this Statement can be found on the At-Large ICANN Consolidated Meetings Strategy Proposal Workspace< https://community.icann.org/x/_5MoAg>.
Please note that the poll will be open from 10-November-2012 00:01 UTC to 15-Novemeber-2012 23:59 UTC.
Regards,
Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff@atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>
------------------------------ _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
-- natalia.enciso@gmail.com
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
[[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/a85f4d5d01.html --]]