[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Voting Candidate NomCom - Appreciation staff - Proposal From: josefranciscoarce@gmail.com Dear, First I want to apologize for not being able to participate yesterday's call. I had few significant drawbacks. But now I have read the emails and I received personal emails and wants clarify the panorama: 1) On the day of yesterday took the desicion to go to a vote, personally do not take it and not know who took it. If want to tell that I am in against such desicion by several reasons. One is that this desicion should be taken by the region and should been taken yesterday during the teleconference. Another is that the time are due and must be respectful of them when we can do it, and I think this is a case of them. 2) Due to the events I believe and intend to suspend the voting and send ALAC the list of candidates, and here the justification: a) If the region wants to go to vote, as there are disagreements, and no consensus, first should be voted if the majority wants to go to cavitation or not, and if he wins if recently there go to vote. You know that our region must function by consensus and if not get it we must be respectful of all positions. b) Our region is not required to specify the candidate preference. Anyway, each of you can express in the wiki, where everyone, including ALAC can see those apoyos.c) I think is the solution that reconcile the interests of all and we'd be respecting deadlines and ALAC could see the support for the candidates in the wiki. Les send a greeting affectionate Jose Arce. _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/64d7c93256.html --]]