[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Report and recommendations on domains without point From: asoto@ibero-americano.org Absolutely. For m, of the problems, the higher the safety, by the ambigedades in the Resolution, and in addition to the use that may be made of this who always are willing to take advantage of "holes" that are left open. Regards Alberto Soto ----- Original Message ----- From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch Posted on: Friday, August 24, 2012 10:30 pm To lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: [lac-discuss-es] Report and recommendations on domains without point Colleagues, in http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/sac053-dotless-domains-24aug12-e n.htm just appeared SSAC report on domain names without point. These names are not used at present but may arise in the new gTLDs, especially those who are assigned to trademarks. In this If the registrant may want to open a web page to tecelar only brand in the browser, or electronic mail be directed to email @ BRAND. The SSAC report clearly explains the problems this can producing, based on the IETF estndares, the recommended practices or existing resolvers operation of names, operation of Web browsers, and software operation which is used for electronic mail. The SSAC is sufficiently serious problems (like some in this Community may also have foreseen) to recommend that the "No point names" are not used and proposed that ICANN prohba explcitamente in contracts with entities who obtain asignacin of new gTLDs. Recall that in the regimen of private law that governs those ICANN Contracts are the most strong instrument with which ICANN has, and that his compliance can be monitored and penalized by mechanisms the contracts themselves and the system of "compliance". As you all know, this system has just produced the withdrawal of two recorders acreditacina this week. May I respectfully ask our representatives and elected officials to initiate a consultation to members LACRALO this respect. It is understood that this sercon adherence to regulations and I expect you to go the route of the only ALAC if appropriate, and if it also directly applicable. By ISOC Mexico do not have the slightest hesitation in proposing that the RESOLUTION LACRALO is inequvocamente for recommendations SSAC against the use of "names no point." Of course it can happen that some of our members that LACRALO estn related to proposals for new gTLDs, and others, not estn of agreement. Ojaleso be revealed soon and with transparency. Sincerely, and with best regards, Alejandro Pisanty ! ! ! !! NEW PHONE NUMBER - NUMBER OF NEW phone +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD FROM +525541444475 Mexico SMS +525541444475 Dr. Alejandro Pisanty UNAM, 3000 University Avenue, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the group on LinkedIn UNAM, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/a6637e3e00.html --]]